تدوین مدل حق الزحمه حسابرسی در ایران: شواهد اولیه مبتنی بر روندهای ترتیبی روش ترکیبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،قم، ایران

2 استادیارگروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم مالی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه حسابداری،دانشکده علوم انسانی،واحد قم ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،قم،ایران

4 استادیار گروه حسابداری، پردیس فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

چکیده

اغلب پژوهش‌‌های کمّی مرتبط با عوامل موثر بر تعیین حق الزحمه حسابرسی در کشور به نظر می رسد از مشکلات روش‌شناسی رنج می برند. بدین منظور پژوهش حاضر برای اولین بار از روش ترکیبی مبتنی بر روندهای ترتیبی برای بررسی این موضوع بهره برده است. با تحلیل محتوای پیشینۀ پژوهش، متغیرهایی موثر بر حق الزحمه حسابرسی شناسایی و براساس آن، مصاحبه نیمه‌ ساختار یافته ای با 15 نفر از شرکا، سرپرستان و مدیران فنی موسسات حسابرسی در سال 1398 اجرا گردید. عوامل موثر بر حق الزحمه از طریق کدگذاری و تحلیل مضمون مصاحبه ها شناسایی و براساس آن پرسشنامه ای طراحی و داده ها در نیمه دوم سال 1398 و نیمه اول سال 1399 گردآوری شدند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل عاملی نشان داد که عوامل اثر گذار برتعیین حق الزحمه حسابرسی در ایران را می توان در چهار طبقه کلی شامل عوامل مرتبط با صاحبکار، عوامل مرتبط با کار حسابرسی، عوامل مرتبط با حسابرس و سایر عوامل (ارتباطی و اقتصادی) دسته بندی کرد. به علاوه این پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل موثر بر تعیین حق الزحمه حسابرسی در ایران می تواند در مواردی، متفاوت از عوامل برجسته شده در متون بین المللی باشد (مانند، لابی، حق الزحمه حسابرسی سال قبل و میان دوره ای). به نظر می رسد این مطالعه توانسته باشد برخی از عوامل مهمی که در پژوهش های کیفی و کمی داخلی (مانند، وجود بند شرط در رابطه با وضعیت بیمه و مالیات) مغفول مانده بودند را برجسته کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Audit Fee Model in Iran: First Evidence from a Mixed Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghazal sadat Sadraei 1
  • Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei 2
  • Reza gholami jamkarani 3
  • Omid Faraji 4
1 Department of Accounting,Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2 Accounting Department, Faculty of Finance, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Accounting PhD, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
4 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

 Introduction:
Audit quality and consequently financial reporting quality is subject to appropriate level of fees paid to auditors (Francis, 2004). Low audit fees is one the significant challenges of the audit profession in Iran (MohammadRezaei et al., 2015). Audit fee has attracted the attention of researchers and regulators in both Iran and other countries. However, the review of empirical research about the audit fee model in Iran reveals that most of these studies suffer from several methodological issues such as omitted correlated variable bias (MohammadRezaei and Faraji, 2019). Hence, the present study is going to provide a model about determinants of audit fee in Iran through employing a mixed method.  
Literature review:
Simonic (1980) considers audit fee as a function of audit costs and profit. There are two streams of archival research about audit fees. The older and broader stream is a continuation of previous models but with the aim of quickly identifying new variables that affect audit fees and possibly audit costs such as investigating the effect of the audit market structure (Gunn et al., 2019) and disclosure of audit fees (Averhals et al. 2020). The smaller, second stream uses information about audit work hours to estimate production performance or compare audit performance. In Iran, there is also considerable evidence about determinants of audit fees (such as, Nikhbakhat and Tanani, 2010: MohammadRezaei et al., 2018). Comparison of these studies with the meta-analysis of Hay et al (2006) reveals that the studies suffer from three main methodological issues including omitted correlated variables bias, self- selection bias (endogeniety) and a lack of attention to the different market structure of private and state auditors.
Research method:
Through a close reading of the previous literature, variables affecting the audit fee were identified and based on it, a semi-structured interview with 15 audit partners and managers was conducted. Based on factors affecting audit fee identified through coding and content analysis of the interviews, a questionnaire was designed and data were collected through survey responses from 90 certified auditors.
Findings:
The coding and content analysis of the interviews reveals four codes and 30 themes. In addition, through factor analysis of data obtained from survey responses, the variables affecting audit fees were identified and classified into four groups, including factors related to the client, the auditor, the audit engagement and other factors (lobbying). More specifically, client-related factors include six components and 23 variables, auditor-related factors include four variables, audit engagement factors contain two components and 12 variables and finally lobbying factors include four variables.
Conclusion:
This study indicates that the determinants of audit fee in Iran can be different from those highlighted by prior studies in international era (e.g., lobbying, audit fees in last year and interim fees). Moreover, the present study highlights some of the significant determinants of audit fee model in Iran (e.g., audit qualification paragraph in relation to insurance and tax) that have not been captured by prior qualitative and quantitative research from the setting. This study opens a rich avenue for future studies in Iran about audit fees to overcome methodological issues such as omitted correlated variable bias. In addition, the findings of this study can be interesting for auditors and oversight bodies in Iran.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Audit fee model
  • mixed method
  • clients’ related factors
  • audit engagement’s factors
  • auditors’ related factors and lobbying factors

مراجع

ایمنی، محسن و  دریائی، عباسعلی. (1399). حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی: شواهدی بیشتر از نقش اهرم‌های بدهی عملیاتی و مالی. بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی. 27(4): 495-522.
حریری، نجلا ( 1385). اصول و روش­های پژوهش کیفی، تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران.
زلقی، حسن و سالار سیفی، لاله و مینایی تبریزی، فاطمه سادات (1399). تاثیر توانایی مدیریت و ساز و کارهای حاکمیت شرکتی بر رابطه بین بیش اعتمادی مدیریتی و حق­الزحمه ی حسابرسی، مجله علمی دانش حسابداری مالی. 7(3): 85-110.
صهبای قرقی، المیرا و لاری دشت بیاض، محمود و فکور ثقیه ، امیر محمد (1398). گزارش حسابرس و حق­الزحمه حسابرسی: نقش راهبردهای کسب و کار. بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی. 26(4):517-543.
غلامی گیفان، سعیده و  بذرافشان،  آمنه و صالحی, مهدی. (1398). بررسی رابطه انحصار بازار حسابرسی با حق­الزحمه و کیفیت حسابرسی با در نظر گرفتن ماده 99 قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه. پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری. 9(1).
مرادی، محمد و محقق، فاطمه (1396). رقابت بازار محصول بر حق الزحمه: باتاکید بر نقش حاکمیت شرکتی. پژوهش­های تجربی حسابداری. 7(2): 33-52.
محمدرضایی، فخر الدین (1396). روش پژوهش در حسابداری. انتشارات ترمه.
محمدرضایی، فخر الدین و فرجی، امید (1398). معمای سنجش کیفیت حسابرسی در پژوهش­های آرشیوی: نقد و ارائه پیشنهادهایی برای محیط پژوهشی ایران، بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 26(1): 87-122.
 منصوری، فردین، سعیدی گراغانی، مسلم و اسدی دوبانی، ناهید (1396)، بررسی تاثیر تجدید ارزیابی دارایی­ها بر حق­الزحمه حسابرسی، دانش حسابداری،8(4): 141-159.
نوشادی، میثم و خدادادی،ولی و  واعظ، سید علی. (1397). تدوین مدل حق­الزحمه خدمات حسابرسی. مجله پیشرفت­های حسابداری.10(2): 277-307
نیکبخت، محمدرضا و تنانی، محسن. (1389). آزمون عوامل موثر بر حق­الزحمه حسابرسی صورت­های مالی. مجله پژوهش­های حسابداری مالی. 2(4): 132-111.
ولیان،حسن، صفری گرایلی، مهدی. (1397). ارائه الگویی برای درک تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان با رویکرد تحلیل محتوا. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت, 7(25): 11-28.
هوانسیان فر، گاروو.(1389). انتظار حسابرس، صد درصد حرفه ای، مجله حسابرس. 50: 67-66.
هومن، حیدر علی(1397). مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم افزار لیزرل(با اصلاحات). انتشارات سمت
Akono, H., & Stein, M. (2014). Estimating audit fees and production models. In Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Auditing. New York, Routledge.
Averhals, L., Caneghem, T.V. & Willekens, M. (2020). Mandatory Audit Fee Disclosure and Price Competition in the Private Client Segment of the Belgian Audit Market. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 40, 1-21.
Bell, T. B., R. Doogar and I. Solomon. (2008.) Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research. 46(4), 729–60.
Bierstaker, J.L., & Wright. A. (2001). The Effects of Fee Pressure and Partner Pressure on Audit Planning Decision. Advances in Accounting, 18, 25-46.
Bills, K. L., C. Hayne, & S. E. Stein. (2018). A field study on small accounting firm membership in associations and networks: Implications for audit quality. The Accounting Review.(forthcoming).
Blokdijk, H., F. Drieenhuizen, D. A. Simunic and M. T. Stein. (2006). An Analysis of Cross-sectional in Big and Non-Big Public Accounting Firms’ Programs, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory .25(1), 27-48.
Cahan, S. F. & Sun, J., (2015), The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30( 1), 78-100.
Carcello, J. V., R. H. Hermanson and N. T. McGrath. (1992). Audit Quality Attributes: The Perceptions of Audit Partners, Preparers, and Financial Statement Users, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 11(1), 1–15.
Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20,297–322.
Creswell J.W.(2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative &mixed methods approaches, second edition, thousand oaks.CA:Sage publications.
Creswell J.(2005). Educational research: planning, conducting & evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nded.oxford:oxford university press.
Davis, L. R., D. N. Ricchiute and G. Trompeter. (1993). Audit Effort, Audit Fees, and the Provision of Nonaudit Services to Audit Clients, The Accounting Review 68(1), 135–50.
Ding, R., and  Jia, Y. (2012), Auditor mergers, audit quality and audit fees: Evidence from the PricewaterhouseCoopers merger in the UK, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 31( 1), 69-85.
Dopuch, N.,R.R.King ,&R.Schwartz. (2001). An experimental investigation of retention & rotation requirements. Journal of accounting Research. 39(1),93-117.
Dunn, R.T., Lundstrom, N. G., & Wilkins, M. S., (2021), The impact of mandatory auditor tenure disclosures on ratification voting, auditor dismissal, and audit pricing, Contemporary Accounting Research, Accepted Articles, https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12708.
Eierle, B., Hartlieb, S., Hay, D., Niemi, L., & Ojala, H., (2021). External environment and the pricing of audit services: A systematic review of archival literature (March 31, 2021). AvailableatSSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3816385or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3816385.
Ettredge, M., Fuerherm, E. E., & Li, C. (2014). Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 247-263.
Evans,J., Feng, M., Hoffman, V.,Moser, D., & Van,W., (2015), Points to consider when self-assessing your empirical accounting research, Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1162-1204.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.(1981); “Evaluating Structural Equation Modeling with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error”; Journal of Marking Research,Vol.18, No.1, pp.39-50.
Francis, J. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: a study of the Australian  market. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 6(1), 133-151.
Francis, J.R. & Stokes, D.J. (1986) Audit Prices, Product Differentiation, and Scale Economies: Further Evidence from the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting Research, 24,383-393.
Francis, J. (2004) What do we know about audit quality? British Accounting Review, 36(4):345-368.
Gholami Gifan, Saeideh.& Bazrafshan, Ameneh. & Salehi, Mehdi. (2019). Investigating the relationship between audit market monopoly and remuneration and audit quality, taking into account article 99 of the fifth development plan law. Empirical accounting research. 9(1).( in persion)
Gunn, J. L., Kawada, B. S. & Michas, P. N. (2019). Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: A cross-country analysis of complex audit clients. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38( 6), 106693.
Hariri, N, (2007), Principals and methods of qualitative research. Islamic Azad University.  Science and research branch.(in Persion).
Hasasyeganeh, y. Barzideh, y.Taghavifard, M& Farahmandi, M.(2018). Investigating the impact of forced circulation of auditing institutions on audit fees and audit market competition. Accounting and auditing review. 23(3),333-352.(in Persion).
Hey, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta- analysis of audit fee research. Internatioanl journal of auditing, 17 (2), 162-176.  
Hey, D, Knechel, R& Wong,N.(2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. contemporary accounting research,23, 141-91.
Houston, R. W. (1999). The effect of fee pressure and client risk on audit seniors' time budget decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(2), 70-86.
Hovansianfar, G. (2011). Expect the auditor. One hundred percent professional. auditor journal. 50,66-67(in Persion).
Imeni, Mohsen. & Daryaei, Abasali. (2020). Audit fee: Further analysis of the role of operating and financial debt leverage. Accounting and Auditing review. 27(4). 495-522.(in persion).
Ireland, J. C. and C. S. Lennox. (2002). The Large Audit Fee Premium: A Case of Selectivity  Bias?, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 17(1), 73–91.
Joseph, F. Hair,Jr, G.Tomas M.Hult, Christian M.ringle and Marko Sarstedt .(2016). A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Second edition.  SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kenno, S. A., S. A. McCracken, & S. E. Salterio. (2017). Financial reporting interview-based research: a field research primer with an illustrative example. Behavioral Research In Accounting. 29 (1), 77-102.
Khodakarami, M., Rezaee, Z., & Hesarzadeh, R. (2021). Islamic religious atmosphere and audit pricing: Evidence from Iran. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, Accepted Article,  https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12364.
Kim, J., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees: Theory and Evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061-2094.
Kim, y.,&  Li,H.,Li,S., (2014). CEO equity incentives and audit fees. Contemporary accounting research, forthcoming.
Langli, J. C., & Svanström, T. (2014). Audits of private companies. In Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Auditing. New York, Routledge.
Lai, K-W., (2019), Audit report lag, audit fees, and audit quality following an audit firm merger: Evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 36, 100-271.
Mansouri, Fardin. & Saeidi Graghani, Moslem. & Asadadi Dobani, Nahid. (2016). Investigating the impact of asset revaluation on audit fees. Accounting knowledge. 8(4). 11-159.(in persion).
Margheim, L., & Kelly, T . (1992) . The Perceived Effects of Fixed Fee Audit Billing Arrangements .Accounting Horizons, (December), 62-75.
Mennan, K. & Williams, D.D.,(2001), Long-term trends in audit fees, Auditing: A journal of practice and theory, (1)20, 115-130.
Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, & J. Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mohammadrezaei, F. Mohd-Saleh, N & Jahangir, A. Muhammad,(2015). Increased competition in an unfavorable Audit market fallowing audit privatization: The Iranian experience. Asian journal of business and accounting. 8(1),115-149.
Mohammadrezaei, F, Mohd-Saleh, N & Ahmed, K. (2018). Audit firm ranking, Audit quality and Audit fees: Examining conflicting price discrimination views. International journal of accounting. 54(4),1-19.
Moradi, M., & Mohaghegh, F(2018). Product market competition for remuneration: emphasis on the role of corporate governance. Empirical accounting research. 7(2), 33-52(in Persion).
Mohammadrezaei, F.,( 2018). Research methods in accounting.Iran: Termeh publication.
Mohammadrezaei, F., & Faraji. O. (2019). The delimma of audit quality measuring in archival studies: critiques and suggestions for Iran's research setting. Journal of accounting and auditing review. 26(1). 87-122(in Persion).
Nikbakht, M., & Tanani, M. (2011). Test the factors affecting the financial statement's audit fee. Journal of financial accounting research. 4, 111-132(in Persion).
Noshadi, M., & Khodadadai, V. & Vaez, Ali. (2019). Develop an audit fee model. Journal of accounting advances. 10(2), 27-307(in Persion).
O'keef, T.B., King,R.D.& Gaver, K.M.(1994). Audit fees, industry, specialization and compliance with GAAS reporting standards. Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory.13(2).
Palmrose,z.v.(1989). The relation of audit contract type to fees and hours . Accounting review, 64(3).488-499.
Pearson, T. and G. Trompeter. (1994). Competition in the Market for Audit Services: The Effect of Supplier Concentration on Audit Fees. Contemporary Accounting Research .11(1), 91–114.
Sahbay Ghoghi, E.Lari Dashtebayazi, M, Fakoor saghi, A.M. (2019). Auditor reporting and audit fees: the role of business strategies. Accounting and Auditing review. 26(4), 517-543(in Persion).
Simon, D. T. (1985). The Audit Services Market: Additional Empirical Evidence, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory .5(1),71–8.
Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research, 18(1),161-190.
Simunic, D&  Stein, M,(1996), The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: a review of the economics & the evidence, auditing: A journal of practice & theory. 15, 134-199.
Su, X. & Wu, X. (2017). Public disclosure of audit fees and bargaining power between the client and auditor: Evidence from China, The International Journal of Accounting, 52, 64-76.
Valian, Hasan.& Safari Graeili, Mehdi. (2017). Providing a model for understanding the skepticism of the auditing profession with a content analysis approach. Accounting knowledge and management auditing.  25(1), 11-28.( in persion)
Westermann, K. D., J. C. Bedard, & C. E. Earley. (2015.) Learning the “craft” of auditing: a dynamic view of auditors’ on the job learning. Contemporary Accounting Research 32(3), 864-896.
Westermann, K. D., J. R. Cohen, & G. Trompeter. (2018). PCAOB inspections: Public accounting firms on trial. Contemporary Accounting Research. Forthcoming.
 Zalaghi, H. Salarseifi, L. Minaei Tabrizi, F.S. (2020). Effect of management ability and corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between managerial overconfidence and audit fees, journal of financial accounting knowledge, 7(3), 85-110(in Persion).
 
 
 
پیشرفت‌های حسابداری
دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 81
اردیبهشت 1400
صفحه 191-224

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 24 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 01 مهر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 مهر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار