ابزارهای حسابداری مدیریت حلقه‌ی مفقوده خلق ارزش؛ آزمون تجربی تئوری اقتضایی

صیادی سومار, علی; سبزعلی پور, فرشاد

doi:10.22099/jaa.2020.34368.1899

ابزارهای حسابداری مدیریت حلقه‌ی مفقوده خلق ارزش؛ آزمون تجربی تئوری اقتضایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ استادیار گروه آموزشی حسابداری،واحد علوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران،ایران

² استادیار گروه آموزشی حسابداری ، دانشگاه ایلام،ایلام،ایران

10.22099/jaa.2020.34368.1899

چکیده

Journal of Accounting Advances, (2020) 12(1): 213-237
DOI: 10.22099/JAA.2020.34368.1899

Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA)
Journal homepage: www.jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/?lang=en

The Management Accounting Tools of Rings Missing Value Creation; Empirical Testing Contingency Theory
Dr. Ali Sayadi Somar,^1* Dr. Farshad Sabzalipour²

1- PhD of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Ali69.ilam.ac@gmail.com
2- Assistant Professor of Accounting, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

ARTICLE INF

ABSTRACT

Received: 2019-9-20
Accepted: 2020-8-28

The increasing costs of production and resource constraints have caused changes in the context and composition of costs. So, companies are not willing to impose costs for activities that are not worthwhile and they seek to remove them and create activities that are valuable. The use of modern cost management tools can provide value creation, provided that they are faced with environmental contingency factors inside and outside the company. So the purpose of this research, is to test the contingency model of influencing factors on the philosophy of value creation and the effective use of corporate resources. Research results are based on the data of 117 companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange for a specific time period of ten years (2009-2018), by using the structural equation modeling approach. Implying the effect, 8 contingency factors of human resources, economic environment, external environment, organizational strategy, technology, competitive environment, financial resources and senior management support are significant in using the information of management accountants for value creation and effective use of corporate resources, while 4 contingency factors do nothave a significant effect on the use of management accounting reports. Also, the conclusion Matrix Importance-Performance shows that attention to contingency factors competition power, new technologies, economic environment, ratio of R&D expenditures, the degree of compliance with environmental uncertainty, performance of human capital index and structures corporate governance is the key to creating double value in activities and effectiveness in resource utilization companies. Also, among the possible factors, technology and human resources have the most impact.

* Corresponding author:

Dr. Ali Sayadi Somar

PhD of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch,

Email: Ali69.ilam.ac@gmail.com

1- Introduction
       The increasing costs of production and resource constraints have caused changes in the context and composition of costs. So, companies are not willing to impose costs for activities that are not worthwhile and seek to remove them and create activities that are valuable. The use of modern cost management tools can provide value creation, provided that they are faced with environmental contingency factors inside and outside the company.This indicates the impact of the environment on the effectiveness of management accounting information which evokes the basic concept of contingency theory. Contingency theory, raises the concept of proportionality between enterprise features and environmental factors.

2- Hypotheses
       Considering the theoretical foundations research and the literature of research,12 contingency factors have been identified. So, the aims this research are, to test the contingency model of influencing factors on the philosophy of value creation and the effective use of corporate resources in listed companies of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Thus, the research hypotheses are discussed as follows:
H: Contingency factors affect the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H1: External environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H2: Economic environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H3: Competitive environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H4: Cultural factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H5: Professional section factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H6: Organizational structure factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H7: Technology factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H8: Organization strategy factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H9: Size organization factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H10: Supporting senior executives factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H11:Financial resources factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H12: Human resources factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.

3- Methods
       The method of research is correlation and causal. In order to investigate the issue, based on the structural equation model, the data of 117 companies that were accepted in TSE for a specific time period of ten years (2009-2018), were collected from the Rahavard Novin software, the Tehran Stock Exchange website, the Central Bank website and a standard questionnaire. The collected data was calculated using the Excel software and was analyzed by SmartPLS3. In order to analyze the hypothesis, importance-performance matrix and t-test have been used.

4- Results
       The results of the research show that the 8 contingency factors of human resources, economic environment, external environment, organizational strategy, technology, competitive environment, financial resources and senior management support are effective in using the informatin of management accountants for value creation. Effective use of corporate resources and 4 contingency factors of organizational structure, company size, cultural factors and professional sector do not have a significant effect on the use of management accounting reports. Also, the results of Matrix Importance-Performance show that attention to contingency factors’ competition power, new technologies, economic environment, ratio of R&D expenditures, the degree of compliance with environmental uncertainty, performance of human capital index and structures corporate governance in the first quarter of the matrix (region continued effort) have taken place and they are highly important in the effectiveness of resource use and value creation.

5- Discussion and Conclusion
       The conclusion shows that attention to factors such as competition power in the market, use of new technologies, transformation of economic threats into opportunity, allocation of funds for research and development purposes, adaptation to existing environmental uncertainty, the use of professional people and formation of structures strong corporate governance are the key to creating a double value in activities and effectiveness in resource utilization. Therefore, it is suggested to managers of companies to consider the strategies presented in the reports of management accountants in the turbulent environment of the country for planning, decision making and control of operations. Also, among the possible factors, technology and human resources have the most impact.

Keywords:Management Accountants, Philosophy of Value Creation, Factors Contingency Theory, Structural Equation Modeling.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20089988.1399.12.1.8.5

عنوان مقاله [English]

Management Accounting Tools rings missing value creation; empirical testing contingency theory

نویسندگان [English]

Ali SAYADI SOMAR ¹
Farshad sabzali poor ²

¹ Ph.D Accounting,Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran

² Assistant Prof accounting ,Ilam University

چکیده [English]

Journal of Accounting Advances, (2020) 12(1): 213-237
DOI: 10.22099/JAA.2020.34368.1899
Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA)
Journal homepage: www.jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/?lang=en

The Management Accounting Tools of Rings Missing Value Creation; Empirical Testing Contingency Theory

ABSTRACT
Received: 2019-9-20
Accepted: 2020-8-28
The increasing costs of production and resource constraints have caused changes in the context and composition of costs. So, companies are not willing to impose costs for activities that are not worthwhile and they seek to remove them and create activities that are valuable. The use of modern cost management tools can provide value creation, provided that they are faced with environmental contingency factors inside and outside the company. So the purpose of this research, is to test the contingency model of influencing factors on the philosophy of value creation and the effective use of corporate resources. Research results are based on the data of 117 companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange for a specific time period of ten years (2009-2018), by using the structural equation modeling approach. Implying the effect, 8 contingency factors of human resources, economic environment, external environment, organizational strategy, technology, competitive environment, financial resources and senior management support are significant in using the information of management accountants for value creation and effective use of corporate resources, while 4 contingency factors do nothave a significant effect on the use of management accounting reports. Also, the conclusion Matrix Importance-Performance shows that attention to contingency factors competition power, new technologies, economic environment, ratio of R&D expenditures, the degree of compliance with environmental uncertainty, performance of human capital index and structures corporate governance is the key to creating double value in activities and effectiveness in resource utilization companies. Also, among the possible factors, technology and human resources have the most impact.

1-introduction
       The increasing costs of production and resource constraints have caused changes in the context and composition of costs. So, companies are not willing to impose costs for activities that are not worthwhile and seek to remove them and create activities that are valuable. The use of modern cost management tools can provide value creation, provided that they are faced with environmental contingency factors inside and outside the company.This indicates the impact of the environment on the effectiveness of management accounting information which evokes the basic concept of contingency theory. Contingency theory, raises the concept of proportionality between enterprise features and environmental factors.

2- Hypotheses
       Considering the theoretical foundations research and the literature of research,12 contingency factors have been identified. So, the aims this research are, to test the contingency model of influencing factors on the philosophy of value creation and the effective use of corporate resources in listed companies of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Thus, the research hypotheses are discussed as follows:
H: Contingency factors affect the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H1: External environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H2: Economic environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H3: Competitive environment factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H4: Cultural factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H5: Professional section factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H6: Organizational structure factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H7: Technology factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H8: Organization strategy factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H9: Size organization factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H10: Supporting senior executives factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H11:Financial resources factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.
H12: Human resources factor affects the uses of the fourth stage tools of management accounting evolution.

3- Methods
       The method of research is correlation and causal. In order to investigate the issue, based on the structural equation model, the data of 117 companies that were accepted in TSE for a specific time period of ten years (2009-2018), were collected from the Rahavard Novin software, the Tehran Stock Exchange website, the Central Bank website and a standard questionnaire. The collected data was calculated using the Excel software and was analyzed by SmartPLS3. In order to analyze the hypothesis, importance-performance matrix and t-test have been used.

4- Results
       The results of the research show that the 8 contingency factors of human resources, economic environment, external environment, organizational strategy, technology, competitive environment, financial resources and senior management support are effective in using the informatin of management accountants for value creation. Effective use of corporate resources and 4 contingency factors of organizational structure, company size, cultural factors and professional sector do not have a significant effect on the use of management accounting reports. Also, the results of Matrix Importance-Performance show that attention to contingency factors’ competition power, new technologies, economic environment, ratio of R&D expenditures, the degree of compliance with environmental uncertainty, performance of human capital index and structures corporate governance in the first quarter of the matrix (region continued effort) have taken place and they are highly important in the effectiveness of resource use and value creation.

5- Discussion and Conclusion
       The conclusion shows that attention to factors such as competition power in the market, use of new technologies, transformation of economic threats into opportunity, allocation of funds for research and development purposes, adaptation to existing environmental uncertainty, the use of professional people and formation of structures strong corporate governance are the key to creating a double value in activities and effectiveness in resource utilization. Therefore, it is suggested to managers of companies to consider the strategies presented in the reports of management accountants in the turbulent environment of the country for planning, decision making and control of operations. Also, among the possible factors, technology and human resources have the most impact.

Keywords:Management Accountants, Philosophy of Value Creation, Factors Contingency Theory, Structural Equation Modeling.

مراجع

منابع

الف. فارسی

خواجوی، شکرالله؛ و قدیریان آرانی، محمدحسین (1397). نقش سرمایه فکری در پیشبینی بحران مالی، پیشرفتهای حسابداری،10(2)، 137-166.

حساسیگانه، یحیی؛ دیانتی دیلمی، زهرا و نوروزبیگی، ابراهیم (1390). بررسی وضعیت حسابداری مدیریت در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، حسابداری مدیریت، 4(8)، 1-18.

داوری، علی و رضازاده، آرش (1395). مد‌‌ل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، چ 3، تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.

رضایی، مهدی؛ پارسا، حجت و مهربانیان، سیما (1396). تأثیر رشد اقتصادی و تحریم‎های اقتصادی بر چسبندگی هزینه در شرکت‎های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 24(4)، 551-572.

رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون (1396). دایرهالمعارف نظریهشناسی و نظریهپردازی در حسابداری مدیریت، جلد 2، چ 1، تهران: انتشارات ترمه.

صیادی سومار، علی؛ رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ پورزمانی، زهرا و نیکومرام، هاشم (1398). تحلیل نقش حسابداران مدیریت به عنوان مشاوران استراتژیک شرکتها براساس آزمون الگوی اقتضایی، دانش حسابداری،10(3)، 89-138.

عربمازار یزدی، محمد؛ ناصری، احمد؛ نکوئیزاده، مریم و مرادی، امیر. (1396)، بررسی تاثیر انعطافپذیری سیستم اطلاعاتی حسابداری بر عملکرد شرکت با رویکرد قابلیتهای پویا، بررسیهای حسابداری و حسابرسی،24(2)،221-242.

قاسمیه، رحیم؛ غیوری مقدم، علی و حاجب، حمیدرضا. (1393)، بررسی تاثیر رقابت بازار محصول بر رابطه بین ساختار سرمایه و عملکرد واحد تجاری، پیشرفتهای حسابداری،6(2)،107-129.

نمازی، محمد؛ دهقانیسعدی، علیاصغر و قوهستانی، سمانه (1396). خودشیفتگی مدیران و استراتژی تجاری شرکتها، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 6(22)، 37-52.

نمازی، محمد (1385). چالشها و فرصتهای حسابداری مدیریت، ماهنامه حسابدار، 24(180)، 3-12.

نمازی، محمد (1396)، حسابداری مدیریت استراتژیک: از تئوری تا عمل، جلد اول، چ 2، تهران، انتشارات سمت، 8.

هادیان، محمد؛ محمدزاده، امیر؛ ایمانی، علی و گلستانی، مینا (1388). تحلیل و برآورد هزینۀ تمام شدۀ خدمات با استفاده از روش حسابداری تقلیلی - مرحله‌ای، مدیریت سلامت، 12(37)، 39-48.

ب. انگلیسی

Abdel-Kader, M. & Luther R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis. British Accounting Review, 40 (1), 2-27.

Abdel-Kader, M., Luther, R., & IFAK, S. (2006). Conception of the evolution of management accounting: A research note. Advances in Management Accounting, 15(1), 229-247.

Abugalia, M. (2011). The influence of business environment on the effectiveness of management accounting practices: Evidence from Libyan Companies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Huddersfield, 1-357.

Affes, H. & Ayadi, F. (2014). Contextual factors impact on the use of new management accounting practices: An empirical analysis in the Tunisian context. Journal of Research in International Business and Management, 4(3), 45-55.

Arabmazar, M., Nasseri, A., Nekoee Zadeh, M. & Moradi, A. (2017). The impact of accounting information system flexibility on firm performance with dynamic capabilities approach. Accounting and Auditing Review, 24(2), 221-242. (In Persian)

Badertscher, B., Daniel, A., Colling. W. & Tomas, Z. (2012). Discretionary accounting choices and the predictive ability of accruals with respect to future cash flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 330-352.

Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2016). Structural equation modeling with PLS. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publications . (In Persian)

Effendi, I, & Kusmantini, T. (2015). The moderating effect of contingency variables on the relationship between formal strategic planning and company performance. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(2), 1132-1141.

Ghasemiyeh, R., Ghayori Moghadam, A., & Hajeb, H.R, (2014). The effect of competition in product market on the degree of relationship between capital structure and business enterprise performance. Journal of Accounting Advances, 6(2), 107-129.(In Persian)

Haldma, T. & Lääts, K. (2002). Influencing contingencies on management accounting practices in Estonian manufacturing companies. Tartu Universit,13(4), 1-41.

Hadian, M., Mohammadzade, A., Imani, A. & Golestani, M. (2009). Analysis and unit cost estimation of services using step- down method. Journal of Health Administration, 12(37), 39-48. (In Persian)

Hassas Yeganeh, Y., Dianti Deilami, Z. & Norouzbeigi, E. (2011). Management accounting practices in the firm listed on the Tehran Stock Exchanged: An empirical examination. Management Accounting, 4(8), 1-18. (In Persian)

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd Ed,), Thousand Oaks.

Ibrahim, A. E. A. (2015). Economic growth and cost stickiness: evidence from Egypt. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13(1), 119-140.

Kamal, S. (2015). Historical evolution of management accounting. The Cost and Management, 4(43), 12-19.

Khajavi, Sh., & Ghadirian Arani, M.H., (2018). The role of intellectual capital in financial distress prediction. Journal of Accounting Advances, 10(2), 137-166. (In Persian)

Laitinen, E. K. (2001). Management accounting change in small technology companies: Towards a mathematical model of the technology firm. Management Acoounting Research, 12(4), 507-541.

Macarthur, J. B. (2006). Cultural influences on german versus U.S. management accounting practices. Management Accounting Quarterly, 7 (2), 10-16.

Namazi, M., Dehghani Saadi, A. As., & Ghoohestani, S. (2017). CEO Narcissism and business strategy. Iranian Journal of Accounting Knowledge & Management Auditing, 6(22) , 37-52. (In Persian)

Namazi, M. (2006). Challenges and opportunities of management accounting. Journal of Accountant, 24(180), 3-12. (In Persian)

Namazi, M. (2017). Strategic management accounting: From theory to practice. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian)

Prasad, B. & Junni, P. (2017). A contingency model of CEO characteristics and firm innovativeness: The moderating role of organizational size, Management Decision, 55(1), 156-177.

Rahnamay Roodposhti, F. (2017). Encyclopedia of theorist and theorizing in management accounting. Tehran: Termeh Publishing, 56. (In Persian)

Rezaei, M. Parsa, H., & Mehrabaniyan, S. (2017). The effect of economic growth and sanctions on cost stickiness in listed firms on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 24(4), 551-572. (In Persian)

Sayadi Somar, A., Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Pourzamani, Z. & Nikoomaram, H. (2019). Analysis of the role of management accountants as strategic advisers based on contingency model. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 10(3), 89-138. (In Persian)

Schwarzea, F., Wüllenweber, K. & Hackethal, A. (2007). Drivers of and barriers to management accounting change. Journal of Management Accouting Research, 2(1), 1-46.

Soobaroyen, T. (2008). The effectivness of management accounting systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 187-219.

Tayles, M., Richard, H. & Saudah, S. (2007). Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance; Perceptions of managers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal، Bradford, 20(4), 522-548.

Teng, M., & Li, Ch. (2011). Product market competition, board structure and disclosure quality. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(2), 291- 316.

Verbeeten, F. (2010). The impact of business unit strategy, structure and technical innovativeness on change in management accounting and control systems at the business unit level: An empirical anahysis. International Journal of Management, 27(1), 123-143.

Wadongo, B. & Abdel-Kader, M. (2014). Contingency theory, performance management and organisational effectiveness in the third sector, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(6), 680-703.