تدوین مدل حق‌الزحمه خدمات حسابرسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای حسابداری ،دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 دانشیار گروه حسابداری ،دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 دانشیارگروه حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

4 دانشیار گروه علوم اجتماعی ،دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

چکیده
حق‌الزحمة حسابرسی، به عوامل متعددی ازجمله ویژگی‌های مؤسسه حسابرسی، ویژگی‌های صاحبکار، شرایط حرفه، استفاده‌کنندگان، شرایط رقابتی، محیطی و ... بستگی دارد. در این پژوهش، به‌منظور بررسی جامع عوامل مؤثر بر حق‌الزحمه، با مصاحبه عمیق خبرگان، از روش کیفی و رویکرد مبتنی بر نظریه‌پردازی زمینه‌ای استفاده و نتایج در قالب یک مدل استخراج شده است. برای اعتباربخشی به نتایج پژوهش از معیارهای زاویه‌بندی (اجماع/مثلث‌سازی) داده‌ها، کنترل اعضا و مقبولیت استفاده شده است. طبق نتایج و مدل ارائه‌شده عوامل مهم به این شرح است: اندازة مؤسسه، میزان رعایت آیین رفتار حرفه‌ای، ارزش (ارزشمند بودن) کار برای صاحبکار و ویژگی‌ها و اعتبار مدیران و شرکا مهم‌ترین عوامل مؤثر در سطح مؤسسه حسابرسی است؛ اندازه، ریسک، توان تقاضای کیفیت، هدف صاحبکار از حسابرسی و حاکمیت شرکتی اثربخش مهم‌ترین عوامل در سطح صاحبکار است؛ درک استفاده‌کنندگان و ذینفعان کلیدی از حسابرسی، نگرش و ویژگی‌های سیاست‌گذاران و تصمیم‌گیرندگان و تدوین مقررات و ضوابط اثربخش، مهم‌ترین عوامل در سطح حرفه و شرایط محیطی است. این عوامل در صورت اتخاذ راهبردهای لازم و وجود زمینه مناسب در سطح کلان و حرفه‌ای حسابرسی، ازجمله فراهم شدن بستر اقتصادی، بازار، قدرت نهادهای ناظر بر حرفه حسابرسی و تعامل سازنده این نهادها با دولت و قانون‌گذاران منجر به دستیابی به حق‌الزحمة معقول می‌شوند. مجموعة این عوامل به همراه پیامدهای حق‌الزحمة معقول، مدل حق‌الزحمة خدمات حسابرسی را تشکیل می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of Audit Services Pricing Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • meysam noshadi 1
  • vali khodadadi 2
  • Sayed ali vaez 3
  • ali hosein hoseinzadeh 4
1 Accounting department, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, iran
2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
3 Associate Prof in Accounting., Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
چکیده [English]

                         
Introduction
The study of factors affecting audit fee is of great significance in terms of its impact on audit quality. Audit fee is effective in proper planning and implementation of financial audit. Accordingly, the prerequisite for audit quality is to receive sufficient fee. Simunic (1980) designed a model for audit services pricing for the first time. In this study, factors such as size, complexity (number of branches and type of activity), and risk (variety of activities) of client have statistically been determinants for audit fee. Since Simunic’s seminal article was published, several studies have strived to design models to describe the deviation in the level of audit fee paid by companies. Empirical models of audit fee generally consider fee as a function of working hours spent. The common factors in all previous studies are size, complexity and risk of employer’s company. These models show a high explanatory power and have been powerful factors in determining audit fee in different samples, countries, and time periods (Menon, & Williams, 2001). Therefore, due to the fact that, first, attention to other factors has not been considered in the studies including the conditions relating to the audit profession, cultural and environmental factors, and some features of audit firm and client, second, major studies are limited to the audit market of countries such as United States, UK, and Australia, and little attention has been paid to audit services in other countries, a deep study and extraction of a comprehensive and integrated audit fee model is essential in Iran.
 
Research Question
This research seeks to introduce new factors influencing audit fees and ultimately provide the effective factors in the form of a model. Accordingly, the present study seeks to answer the research question of what the appropriate model for audit fee is.
 
Methods
In this research, given the purpose of the study, grounded theory method has been used. In this study grounded theory method was used in order to get a deep understanding of the issue and to accomplish all the factors and processes of determining audit fee from the perspective of experts and presenting a data-based model. The data were collected and coded through interviews and voice recording. Unstructured interview was used as a data collection method. The samples were selected using purposive sampling technique. Purposive sampling continued until we reached the theoretical saturation of the data which led to the selection of 15 partners of Trusted Audit Institutions of the Stock Exchange, 2 members of Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants, 4 financial managers, and 2 Managing Directors of the Companies Accepted in Stock Exchange. In the present study, Strauss and Corbin (1998) triple coding, which includes open, axial and selective coding, has been used.
 
Results
In the present study, all the factors affecting audit fee from the perspective of the supplier and the applicant for these services and professional and environmental conditions have been analyzed and extracted. Causal conditions have been raised at each of these levels. Due to the fact that audit fees at each level (supplier, applicant, and profession, and community) are affected by a variety of factors, in order to comprehensively examine the issue of audit fee action strategies, intervening factors and the consequences at each of the levels mentioned were investigated and the context condition in the country was also described for audit fee. According to the results and model presented, the size of the audit firm, the degree of observance of the Code of Ethics, the value (worthiness) of the work for the client, and the attributes and credibility of managers and partners were recognized as the most important factors at the level of audit firm. Furthermore, size, risk, demand of quality, the purpose of the client for auditing, and effective corporate governance were the most important factors at the level of the client. In addition, the perception of key users and stakeholders from auditing, attitudes and characteristics of policy makers and decision makers, and the formulation of effective rules and regulations were the most important factors at the level of profession and environmental conditions. If appropriate strategies are adapted and proper context at the macro-level and audit profession including the provision of economic substrate, market, and the power of supervisory institutions on audit firms, and the constructive interaction of these institutions with the government and lawmakers are provided, it will lead to obtain reasonable audit fee. The set of these factors, together with the consequences of reasonable audit fee, constitute the model of the audit fee
 
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that some of the components of the model extracted in this research, on which studies have already been carried out, are almost consistent with the literature. However, in this model, certain factors and variables have been accentuated and some other factors have been added to the previous models. Categories such as the purpose of the client for auditing, the demand of quality, the existence of effective corporate governance, and the type of the systems established in the firm at the level of client, the degree of observance of codes of ethics, the attitudes and characteristics of managers and partners, the existence of different units in the firm, the value of work for the client, providing timely information to the client, the credibility and validity of the firm and partners at the level of audit firm, and the perception of stakeholders and key users of the audit, the attitudes and characteristics of policymakers and decision makers, the formulation of effective rules and regulations, size and market concentration, and the risk of legal claims in Iran at the level of users, professional and environmental conditions are the most important achievements of this research that are considered as increasing knowledge along with the concepts related to each category, dimensions, and characteristics of each concept.
 


کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Audit profession
  • client
  • audit fee model
  • audit firm
  • Grounded Theory
 
منابع
الف. فارسی
استراوس، آنسلم و کوربین، جولیت (1998)، اصول روش تحقیق کیفی، نظریه مبنایی- رویه‌ها و شیوهها، ترجمة محمدی، بیوک، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 1390.
بازرگان، عباس (1394)، مقدمه‌ای بر روش‌های تحقیق کیفی و آمیخته: رویکردهای متداول در علوم رفتاری، تهران: نشر دیدار.
حریری، نجلا (1385)، اصول و روش‌های پژوهش کیفی، تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران.
رجبی، روح‌الله (1383)، عوامل مؤثر بر قدرت حرفه‌ای حسابرسی مستقل. پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری.
افشار زیدآبادی، فاطمه؛ علی­نژاد ساروکلائی، مهدی و زیدآبادی، مهدی. (1394)، بررسی تأثیر ویژگی‌های حسابرس و مالکیت مدیریتی بر سطح نگهداشت وجه نقد، مجله پیشرفت‌های حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز،7 (2)، ص 1-32.
صلصالی، مهوش؛ فخرموحدی، علی و چراغی، محمدعلی. (1386)، تحقیق گراندد تئوری در علوم پزشکی (فلسفه و اصول کاربردی)، تهران: بشری-تحفه.
علوی طبری، سید حسین؛ رجبی، روح­اله و شهبازی، منصوره. (1390)، رابطه نظام راهبری و حق‌الزحمة حسابرسی مستقل شرکت‌ها، مجله دانش حسابداری، 2(2)، 75-101.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ مهرانی، کاوه؛ رحمانی، علی و  مداحی، آزاده. (1392)، تدوین مدل کیفیت حسابرسی، فصل‌نامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 23(3)، 103-137.
مهرانی، ساسان و جمشیدی اوانکی، کورش (1390)، عوامل مؤثر بر تعیین حق‌الزحمة حسابرسی، فصل‌نامه حسابدار رسمی، 3(1)، 60-78.
موسوی شیری، سید محمود و پهلوان، مریم (1394)، توازن بین مسئولیت‌های حسابرسی و عمل بازاریابی توسط اعضای جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران، مجله پیشرفت‌های حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز، 3(69)، 183-218.
نیک‌بخت، محمدرضا؛ بزرگ اصل، موسی و آزادی، کیهان. (1395)، ارائه مدلی جامع برای قیمت‌گذاری خدمات حسابرسی با استفاده از منطق فازی، مجله دانش حسابداری مالی، 3(3)، ص 97-116.
نیک‌بخت، محمدرضا و تنانی، محسن (1389)، آزمون عوامل مؤثر بر حق‌الزحمة حسابرسی صورت‌های مالی، مجله پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 2(2)، 111-132.
 
ب. انگلیسی
Afshar zeidabadi, F., Alinezhad Sarokolaee, M., & Zeidabadinezhad, M. (2015). Studying the effect of auditor's characteristics and managerial ownership on cash holding level. Journal of Accounting Advances, 7(2), 1-32 . (In persian)
Alavi Tabari, S., Rajabi, R., & Shahbazi, M. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and audit fees.Journal of Accounting Knowledge , 2(5), 75-101. (In persian)
Bazargan, A. (2015). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods: common approaches in behavioral sciences, Tehran: Didar Publishing.(In persian)
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R. & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 297-322.
Eshleman, J. D. (2013). The effect of audit market concentration on audit pricing and audit quality: The role of the size of the audit market. Retrieved from: https: digitalcommons.lsu.edu/ gradschool_dissertations/1317.
Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6, 133-151.
Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. (1986). Audit prices, audit differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian audit market. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 383-393.
Gist, W. (1992). Explaining variability in external audit fees. Accounting & Business Research, 23(1), 74-79.
Hariri, N. (2006). Principles and methods of qualitative research, Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch. (In persian)
Hay, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit fee research. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 162-176.
Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–92.
Maher, M. W., Tiessen, P., Colson, R., & Broman, A. J. (1992). Competition and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 67 (January), 199-211.
Mashayekhi, B., Mehrani, K., Rahmani, A,. & Madahi, A. (2013). Development of audit quality model, Securities Exchange Quarterly, 23 (3), 103-137. (In persian)
Mehrani, S,. &  Jamshidi Evanki, K. (2011). Factors affecting the determination of auditing fees, Official Accountant Quarterly, 3(1), 60-78. (In persian)
Menon, K., & Williams, D. D. (2001). Long-term trends in audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(1), 115-136.
Mousavi shiri, M., & Pahlavan, M. (2016). Balancing between marketing and auditing responsibility by members of iranian association of certified public accountants. Journal of Accounting Advances, 7(2), 183-218. (In persian)
Nikbakht, M. R., Bozorgasl, M., & Azadi, k. (2016). A comprehensive model for auditing service pricing using fuzzy logic. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 3(3), 97-116. (In persian)
Nikbakht, M., & Tanani, M. (2010). Test of factors influencing financial audit fees. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 2(2), 111-132 . (In persian)
O'Keefe, T., Simunic, D., & Stein, M. (1994). The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 241-261.
Power, M, K., & Gendron, Y. (2015(. Qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(2), 147-165.
Rajabi, R. (2004). Factors affecting the professional power of independent auditing, PhD Thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, School of Management and Accounting. (In persian)
Rusmanto, T., & Waworuntu, S. R. (2015). Factors influencing audit fee in Indonesian publicly listed companies applying. GCG: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 63-67.
Salsali, M., Fakhrem Vahdi, A. & Cheraghi, M.A. (2007), Grand theory research in medical sciences (philosophy and applied principles), Tehran: Humanities-Gifts. (In persian)
Simon, D. T., & Francis, J. R. (1998). The effects of auditor changes on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review, (April), 255-269
Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
Simunic, D., & Stein, M. T. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (Supplement), 119-134.
Strauss, A,. & Corbyn, J. (1998). Principles of qualitative research method, basic theory-procedures and methods. Translated by Mohammadi, Buick, Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2011. (In persian)
Wu, X. (2012). Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence from companies listed  on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 321-342.
Ying, H. N., Tronnes, P. C. & Wong, L. (2018). Audit seasonality and pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Accounting Literature 40, (2018) 16–28.