بررسی تاثیر قالب بندی و استقلال بر قضاوت حسابرسی با تعدیل گری تردید حرفه ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری، واحد کرج،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، البرز، ایران

2 استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحد کرج،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، البرز، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،البرز، ایران

چکیده

بررسی تأثیر قالب بندی و استقلال بر قضاوت حسابرسی با تعدیل‌گری تردید حرفه‌ای

چکیده: سوگیری‌ها می‌توانند در قضاوت حسابرسی، آثار مخربی به همراه داشته باشند. سوگیری قالب‌بندی یکی از انواع سوگیری‌های شناختی است که می‌تواند بر کیفیت قضاوت حسابرسی تأثیرگذار باشد. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر قالب‌بندی و استقلال بر کیفیت قضاوت حسابرسی است. همچنین، در این پژوهش از تردید حرفه‌ای به‌عنوان متغیر تعدیل‌‌گر استفاده ‌شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، حسابرسان مؤسسات خصوصی و سازمان حسابرسی هستند. این پژوهش، یک نوع تحقیق رفتاری است و هدف آن کاربردی می‌باشد. به لحاظ ماهیت و روش، توصیفی/پیمایشی است. نمونه آماری به‌صورت تصادفی به تعداد ۴۲۰ نفر و مربوط به سال ۱۴۰۰ است. گردآوری داده‌ها از طریق ابزار پرسشنامه صورت گرفته و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار اس پی اس اس، صورت گرفته است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، قالب‌بندی بر کیفیت قضاوت حسابرسی تأثیر منفی و معناداری دارد و تأثیر استقلال بر کیفیت قضاوت حسابرسی مثبت و معنادار است. همچنین، تردید حرفه‌ای به‌عنوان متغیر تعدیل‌گر، می‌تواند ارتباط بین متغیرهای قالب‌بندی و استقلال را با قضاوت حسابرسی تعدیل کند. اهمیت یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر در این است که، جامعه حسابرسان از آثار منفی و مخرب سوگیری قالب‌بندی بر قضاوت حسابرسی، آگاهی می‌یابند.
کلید واژه‌ها: قضاوت حسابرسی، سوگیری، قالب‌بندی، استقلال، تردید حرفه‌ای.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Effect of Framing And Independence On Audit Judgment With Professional Skepticism As A Moderating Variable

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatemeh asadi 1
  • Seyyed Hossein Hosseini 2
  • Bahram Hemmati 2
  • Bahman Banimahd 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, karaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, karaj, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract:
Biases can have destructive effects in audit judgment. Framing bias is one of the types of cognitive biases that can affect the quality of audit judgment. The main purpose of the this research is to investigate the effect of Framing and independence on the quality of audit judgment. Also, Professional skepticism has been used as a moderating variable in this research.The statistical population of this research is auditors working in public and private auditing institutions. This research is a type of behavioral research. From the objective point of view, it is practical And in terms of nature and method, it is descriptive-survey.The random statistical sample is 420 people and related to the year 2021. A questionnaire was used to collect data and structural equation system and SPSS were used to analyze the research data. The results of the research show that Framing has a negative and significant effect on the quality of audit judgment, and the effect of independence on the quality of audit judgment is positive and significant. Also, professional skepticism as a moderating variable can moderate the relationship between variables of framing and independence with audit judgment. The importance of the findings of the present study is that, auditors become aware of the negative and destructive effects of framing bias on audit judgment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: audit judgment
  • bias
  • framing
  • independence
  • professional skepticism
الف. فارسی
آٖب٦ح٧سی، ضٱطظاز؛ آٖبیی چبزٞب٪ی، آضظ.٬ )1402(. سبثیط دیچیسٞیٚبض، ضسجٯ ض٣ُی حسبثطس ٬
دصیطش ضْشبض ٪بٚبضآ٦س ثط ٖؿب٬ر حسبثطسی: ٗ٪ص سًسیٞ١ط اسشٗال،٠ دژٰ٬صٰبی ٦ب٢ی ٬
ضْشبضی زض حسبثساضی، 1)8(77-92، .
اثطاٰی٧ی، اثطاٰی٥؛ اس٧بیی١ظازٮ، حدز. )1394(. س٭ٞیطیٰبی ض٫بذشی زض ٖؿب٬ر حطْٯای
حسبثطسی، ٦کبً٢بر حسبثساضی ٬ حسبثطسی، 4)13(، 74-87 .
ایش٧بزی ییسٞبٰی، سبضا؛ اٖجب٢یٗ٦س،٤ ٦ح٧سضؾب؛ ٪بخیا٦یط٪ژاز، ا٧٢یطا. )1397(. حسبثطسب٨ ذ٭ة ٬
ٖؿب٬رٰبی ثس: ٗ٪ص س٭ٞیطی ٬ سًػت، ٦ب٫ٰب٦ٯ دژٰ٬صٰبی ٦سیطیز ٬ حسبثساضی، ض٧بضٮ
چٱ٬١چٱبض، .49-25
ثبزدب، ثٱط٬ظ؛ د٭ضحیسضی، ا٦یس؛ ذسا٦ید٭ض، اح٧س. )1398(. ثطضسی سأثیط ضٰجطی زٞطٞ٭٨سبظ
غبحتٚبض ثط ٖؿب٬ر حسبثطس ٬ ٗ٪ص ٦یب٪دی آض٫بیی ثب غبحتٚبض، ٦د٣ٯ دیططْزٰبی
حسبثساضی زا٪طٟبٮ ضیطاظ, 11)1(, .29-67
سد٭یسی، ا٫٢بظ؛ ٦ح٧سی، سحط. )1399(. ثطضسی ٗ٪ص اقالیبر حسبثساضی ٦سیطیز زض سیسش٥
٫ٚشط٠ ٦سیطیز زض ضطٚزٰبی ثعضٜ س٭٢یسی زض ایطا،٨ ٪ططیٯ ی٧٣ی حسبثساضی ٦سیطیز،
.1-16 ،)46(13
ذ٭ش قی٫ز، ٦حس٩؛ ثسشب٪یب،٨ خ٭از. )1386(. ٖؿب٬ر حطْٯای زض حسبثطسی. ٦کبً٢بر سدطثی
حسبثساضی ٦ب٢ی, 5)18(, .25-57
زا٬ضی، ی٣ی؛ ضؾبظازٮ، آضش. )1393(. ٦س٠سبظی ً٦بزالر سبذشبضی ثب ٪ط٤اْعاض Smart Pls، سٱطا:٨
ا٪شطبضار خٱبز زا٪طٟبٰی.
زضیبئی، یجبس٣ًی؛ یعیعی، اٚط.٤ )1397(. ضاثکٯ اذال،ٔ سدطثٯ ٬ غالحیز حطْٯای حسبثطسب٨ ثب
ٚیٓیز حسبثطسی )ثب س٭خٯ ثٯ ٗ٪ص سًسی٫٫ٚ١سٮ ضٙ ٬ سطزیس حطْٯای(، زا٪ص حسبثساضی
٦ب٢ی، 5)1(، .79-99
ضؤیبیی، ض٦ؿب٣ً٪ی؛ ٦ح٧سی، ٦ٱسی. )1401(. اذالٔ ٬ حطْٯایٞطایی زض حسبثساضی. سٱطا:٨ ٚشبثرب٪ٯ
ْط.ٝ٫ٰ
ض٪دجطیب،٨ ٢یال؛ ضؾبیی، ٪بزض؛ یجسی، ضس٭٠؛ دب٦٘طا،٤ یسٟط. )1399(. ٗ٪ص سًسی٫٫ٚ١سٞی ضٙ ٬
سطزیس حطْٯای زض ٦س٠ ٖؿب٬ر حطْٯای حسبثطس، ٪ططیٯ خبً٦ٯض٫بسی, 3)4(, .1621-1636
33 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابداری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
سبزارَٓبضی، ٫٦ػ٭ضٮ؛ یعیع٦ح٧سی، ظٰطا؛ ٖبس٧یظازٮ سطاة، حسی.٩ )1399(. سأثیط زض٘ اغ٭٠
اذالٖی ٬ اسشٗال٠ ثط ٖؿب٬ر اذالٖی ثب سبٚیس ثط ٗ٪ص ٦ساذ٣ٯ اضظش ضرػی حسبثطسب،٨
چط٥ا٪ساظ حسبثسضای ٬ ٦سیطیز، 3)22(, .46-59
ی٣ی٧طازی، یجبس. )1396(. ٦س٠ یبثی ً٦بزالر سبذشبضی ثب ٪ط٤ اْعاض Amos( چبح 2(، سٱطا:٨
ا٪شطبضار ْس٘ ایسبسیس.
یعیعی، ی٭سّ؛ سذٱطی، دکط٬؛ ای٧ب٨ظازٮ، دی٧ب.٨ )1401(. سأثیط س٭ا٪بییٰبی ض٫بذشی _ ضْشبضی
حسبثطسب٨ ثط دصیطش ضیسٙ حسبثطسی، ْػ٫٣ب٦ٯ ی٧٣ی اٖشػبز ٬ ثبٛ٪ساضی اسال٦ی، 11)40(،
.337-353
ٚطی٧ی، ظٰطا؛ یًٗ٭ة٪ژاز، اح٧س؛ غ٧سی٢طٞب٪ی، ٦ح٧٭ز؛ د٭ضی٣یالٚالیٯ، ٦ح٧سضؾب. )1400(. اضظیبثی
سأثیطس٭ٞیطیٰبی ض٬ا٪ط٫بذشی ْطزی ٬ اثًبز ضرػیشی حسبثطسب٨ ثط ٚیٓیز حسبثطسی،
دژٰ٬صٰبی حسبثساضی ٦ب٢ی ٬ حسبثطسی، 13)52(، .23-52
ٚطٓی، یجسا٢طس٭.٠ )1387(. ثطضسی ٬ ٗ٪س ٪هطیٯ ضْشبضٞطایی ٣ْسٓی، دژٰ٬صٰبی ٣ْسٓی - ٚال٦ی،
.27-46 ،) 4(9
٫٦شی، ٬حیس؛ سبسب٪یب،٨ ا٦یطحسی.٩ )1401(. ٦ٱبضرٰب، سبثیطٞصاضی ٬ ٚبضآ٦سی حسبثساضا٨
٦سیطیز، ٦د٣ٯ دیططْزٰبی حسبثساضی زا٪طٟبٮ ضیطاظ، 14)1(-311، .343
٧٪بظی، ٦ح٧س؛ ٧٦شبظیب،٨ ی٣یطؾب. )1401(. ض٫بسبیی ٬ ضسجٯث٫سی ی٭ا١٦ ٦إثط ثط ٖؿب٬ر حطْٯای ٬
سػ٧یٞ٥یطی حسبثطسب،٨ زا٪ص حسبثساضی ٬ حسبثطسی ٦سیطیز، 11)43(، .189-207
٪٭ضیْطز، یسا٢ٯ؛ ْیؽد٭ض اٖس،٤ حیسض. )1391(. اثط ذس٦بر َیط حسبثطسی ٦إسسبر حسبثطسی، ثط
٪٭و ٞعاضش حسبثطس، ْػ٫٣ب٦ٯ زا٪ص حسبثساضی ٬ حسبثطسی ٦سیطیز، 1)2(، .1-13
ٰ٭،٩٦ حیسضی٣ی. )1387(. ٦س٠ یبثی ً٦بزالر سبذشبضی ثب ٚبضثطز ٪ط٤ اْعاض ٢یعض٠)چبح ز٤٬(،
سٱطا:٨ ا٪شطبضار س٧ز.
ٰ٭،٩٦ حیسضی٣ی. )1397(. ٦س٠ یبثی ً٦بزالر سبذشبضی ثب ٚبضثطز ٪ط٤ اْعاض ٢یعض٠)چبح ٰطش٥(،
سٱطا:٨ ا٪شطبضار س٧ز.
ب. اًگلیسی
Aghamohammadi, SH., & Aghaei Chadgani, A. (2023). The effect of job
complexity, auditor's job rating and acceptance of inefficient behavior on
audit judgment: The moderating role of independence. Financial and
بررسی تأثیر قالب بندی و استقالل بر قضاوت حسابرسی با تعدیلگری تردید حرفهای 33
Behavioral Researches in Accounting, 3(1), 77-92 (In Persian).
Angkoso, C. D., & Subroto, B. (2014). The role of situational and individual
factors on the premature sign-offs of audit procedures. IOSR Journal of
Economics and Finance, 5(6), 57-68.
Arianto, A. C., Winarno, W. A., & Irmadariyani, R. (2023). Influence of
obedience pressure and task complexity on audit judgment with
professional commitment as moderating variable in the besuki residency
inspectorate. International Journal of Education, Business and Economics
Research, 3 (3), 97-104.
Alimoradi, A. (2017). Modeling Structural Equations With Software AMOS.
fAdak Isatis Publication. Tehran (In Persian).
Azizi, Y., Sepehri, P., & Imanzade, P. (2022). The effect of auditors' cognitivebehavioral abilities on audit risk acceptance. Islamic Economics And
Banking, 11(40 ), 337-353 (In Persian).
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The
role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 109-
126.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
statistical considerations. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology,
51(6), 1173.
Badpa, B., Pourheidari, O., & Khodamipour, A. (2O19). Investigating the effect
of transformational client leadership on auditor’s judgment and the
mediating role of client identification. Journal of Accounting Advances,
11(1), 29-67 (In Persian)
Bećirović, D., Zahirović Suhonjić, A., & Stanić, M. (2022). Using loss aversion
and framing to nudge students' classroom performance. Management:
Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 27(2), 5-17.
Bonner, S.E. (2008). Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cushing, B. E., & Ahlawat, S. S. (1996). Mitigation of recency bias in audit
judgment: The effect of documentation. Auditing, 15(2), 110-122.
Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling With PLS.
Academic Jihad Publication. Tehran (In Persian).
Daryaei, A. A., & Azizi, A. (2018). The impact of ethics, experience and
competency on audit quality (With auditors professional skepticism as a
moderating variable). Financial Accounting Knowledge, 5(1), 79-99 (In
33 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابداری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
Persian).
Dewi, M. S. K., Wirakusuma, M. G., Rasmini, N. K., & Ramantha, I. W.
(2020). The effect of professional skepticism, locus of control, integrity on
audit judgment. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Research, 4(1), 157-164.
Ebrahimi, E., & Esmaielzadeh, H. (2015). Cognitive Biases in Audit
Professional Judgment. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 4(13), 74-87 (In
Persian).
Eny, N., & Mappayukki, R. (2020). Moderating role of audit fees on the effect
of task complexity and independence towards audit judgment. Journal of
Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), 194-204.
Etemadi Eidgahi, S., Iqbali Moghadam, M. R., & Amirnezhad, E. (2018). Good
auditors and bad judgments: the role of bias and bigotry. Management and
Accounting
Researches, 44, 25-49 (In Persian).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with
unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing
Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). Psychology and Life, 18th Edn Boston.
MA: Pearson.[Google Scholar].
Gunawan, I., & Indarto, S. L. (2022). Independence as moderating factors
influencing audit judgment. Asian Journal of Law and Governance, 4(1),
1-10.
Haeridistia, N., & Fadjarenie, A. (2019). The effect of independence,
professional ethics & auditor experience on audit quality. International
Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(2), 24-27.
Hafizah, H., & Wahyudi, T. (2022). The effect of auditor independence and
complexity on audit quality and its impact on the reputation of the auditor
institution: survey of the supreme audit agency (BPK) representative of
south Sumatra. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 8(3),
210-240.
Hasibuan, F. K. A., Bukit, B.R., & Rini, S.E. (2022). The effect of framing,
halo effect and auditor's experience on audit judgment (study on auditors
public accountant office in medan city). International Journal of Research
and Review, 9(9), 37-47.
Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D., & Hunziker, S. (2021). Anchoring and
adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from
بررسی تأثیر قالب بندی و استقالل بر قضاوت حسابرسی با تعدیلگری تردید حرفهای 33
Switzerland. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 598-621.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management
research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal,
20(2), 195-204.
Hurtt, R. K., Brown Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013).
Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and
opportunities for future research Auditing. A Journal of Practice & Theory,
32(1), 45-97.
Hooman, H. A. (2008). Structural equation modeling with LISREL application.
Samt Publications, Tehran (In Persian).
Hooman, H. A. (2018). Structural equation modeling with LISREL application.
Samt Publications, Tehran (In Persian).
Irawati, S. A., & Solikhah, B. (2018). The factors affecting audit judgment.
Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(1), 34-42.
Jamal, K., Johnson, P. E., & Berryman, R. G. (1995). Detecting framing effects
in financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 12(1), 85-
105.
Jeong, M., Zo, H., Lee, C. H., & Ceran, Y. (2019). Feeling displeasure from
online social media postings: A study using cognitive dissonance theory.
Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 231-240.
Johnson, P. E., Jamal, K., & Berryman, R. G. (1991). Effects of framing on
auditor decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 50(1), 75-105.
Karimi, Z., Yaghoobnezhad, A., Samadi Lorghani, M., & Pourali Lakelayeh, M.
R. (2021). Evaluating the effect of auditors' individual psychological bias
and personality dimensions on audit quality. Financial Accounting and
Auditing Researches, 13(52), 23-52 (In Persian).
Kashfi, A. O. R. (2008). Philosophical behaviorism: A critical investigation.
Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9(4), 27-46 (In Persian).
Khoshtinat, M., & Bostanian, J. (2007). Professional judgment in auditing.
Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 5(18), 25-57 (In Persian).
Kleinman, G., Anandarajan, A., Medinets, A., & Palmon, D. (2010). A
theoretical model of cognitive factors that affect auditors' performance and
perceived independence. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting
and Finance, 1(3), 239-267.
Knapp, M. C., & Knapp, C. A. (2012). Cognitive biases in audit engagements.
The CPA Journal, 82(6), 40.
34 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابداری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
Kusumawati, N. P. A., & Ayu, P. C. (2022). The effect of framing and
competence on the quality of audit judgment with professional skepticism
as moderating.Widya Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(01), 60-77.
La Dana, A., Sunaryo, H., & Supriyanto, S. (2022). The effect of locus of
control, framing, pressure of obedience and auditor's competency on audit
judgment. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal,
5(2), 9680-9692.
Lee, D. I. Y., & Phua, L. K. (2022). Does audit committee moderate the
relationship between auditor independence and earnings management
during initial implementation of MFRS in malaysia? International Journal
of Business and Society, 23(2), 751-772.
Maradona, A. F. (2020). A qualitative exploration of heuristics and cognitive
biases in auditor judgements. Accountability, 9(2), 94-112.
Mennati, V., & Sasanian, A. (2022). Skills, influence and effectiveness of
management accountants. Journal of Accounting Advances, 14(1), 311-343
(In Persian).
Miller Jr, H. L. (Ed.). (2016). The Sage encyclopedia of theory in psychology.
Sage Publications.
Mulyandini, V. C. (2023). The relationship between emotional intelligence and
audit judgment: A study on internal auditors in indonesian financial
institutions. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 23(9),
34-38.
Namazi, M., & Momtazian, A. R. (2022). Identification and ranking factors
affecting professional judgment and decision-making of auditors.
Accounting Knowledge and Management Auditing, 11(43), 189-207 (In
Persian).
Namazi, M., & Namazi, N. R. (2016). Conceptual analysis of moderator and
mediator variables in business research. Procedia Economics and Finance,
36, 540-554.
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism
in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1-34.
Noorifard, Y., & Faizpor Aghdam, H. (2012). Affect of nin-audit services of
audit firms on types of audit reports. Journal of Accounting Knowledge
And Management Auditing, 1(2), 1-13 (In Persian).
Okunola, A. O. (2021). An Assessment of auditor's independence on the quality
of financial reporting: Evidence from lagos state parastatals. International
بررسی تأثیر قالب بندی و استقالل بر قضاوت حسابرسی با تعدیلگری تردید حرفهای 32
Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 10(2-3), 88-109.
Pennington, R., Schafer, J. K., & Pinsker, R. (2017). Do auditor advocacy
attitudes impede audit objectivity? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and
Finance, 32(1), 136-151.
Prasanti, O., & Yulianto, A. (2017). The Influence of time budget pressure,
auditor ethics, independence, and task complexity on audit quality with
organizational commitment as intervening variable. Accounting Analysis
Journal, 6(1), 119-127.
Ranjbarian, L., Abdi, R., Rezaeimiyandoa, N., & Pakmaram, A. (2021). The
moderating role of professional doubt in the auditor's professional
judgment model. Iranian Journal of Political Sociology, 3(4), 1621-1636
(In Persian).
Royai, R, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2015). Ethics and Professionalism in
Accounting. Culture Library Publications (in Persian).
Sadat, M., & Azizmohammadi, Z. (2020). The impact of understanding ethics
and the independence of ethical judgment by emphasizing the intervention
of auditors' personal value intervention. Journal of Accounting and
Management vision, 3(22), 46-59 (In Persian).
Santoso, S. H., Muawanah, U., & Lisa, O. (2023). Auditor experience as a
moderation of the effect of audit fees, audit tenure, and task complexity on
audit quality. Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and
Development, 1(4), 189-198.
Septiari, D., & Goedono, G. (2019). Does attribute framing exist in audit
decision aid? Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(1), 41-54.
Shanteau, J. (1989). Cognitive heuristics and biases in behavioral auditing:
Review, comments and observations. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 14(1-2), 165-177.
Singh, A., Singh, H., Sultana, N., & Evans, J. (2019). Independent and joint
effects of audit partner tenure and non-audit fees on audit quality. Journal
of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 15(2), 186-205.
Sonnier, B. M., Lassar, W. M., & Lassar, S. S. (2015). The influence of source
credibility and attribution of blame on juror evaluation of liability of
industry specialist auditors. Journal of Forensic & Investigative
Accounting, 7(1), 1-37.
Tajvidi, E., Mohammadi, S. (2020). The role of management accounting
information in management control system in large manufacturing
companies in iran. Journal of Management Accounting, 13(46), 1-16 (In
Persian).
31 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابداری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics
and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under
uncertainty. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the
psychology of choice. science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Vinson, J., Pike, B., & Chui, L. (2017). Auditor Inquiry: The Influence of Client
Message Framing on Auditors’ Judgment. Available at SSRN 3107164.
Wulanditya, P., Iqbal, S., Prihatiningtias, Y. W., & Subroto, B. (2023).
Argument framing, source credibility, and emotional conditions: effects on
accountants’ whistleblowing decision. International Journal of
Professional Business Review, 8(4), 10-19.
Yuliana, S., & Waluyo, I. (2019). The effect of framing and auditor
independence on the audit judgment. Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu
Akuntansi, 7(3).
Yuliyana, S. (2018). The effect of framing and auditor independence on the
audit judgment. (Case Study on Auditors in Public Accountant Firm of
Yogyakarta.
Yunas, B. A. B., & Triani, N. N. A. (2022). The effect of independence and
competence on audit quality with professional skepticism as a moderating
variable. Journal of Economy, Accounting and Management Science, 4(1),
1-15.
Yusnaini, Y., Hakiki, A., & Wahyudi, T. (2023). Cognitive mapping and
framing bias on decision making. European Journal of Business and
Management Research, 8(3), 227-232.