اثر اتخاذ دیدگاه و انگیزه‌ها بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران.

2 استاد گروه حسابداری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران.

چکیده

سطح مناسبی از تردید حرفه‌ای برای یک حسابرسی با کیفیت بالا ضروری است، برای این منظور، پژوهش حاضر با چشم‌انداز بهبود تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان به بررسی اثر اتخاذ دیدگاه و انگیزه‌ها بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان هنگام حسابرسی برآوردهای پیچیده پرداخته است. این پژوهش روش‌های مختلفی را بررسی می‌کند که اتخاذ دیدگاه (مدیریت و بازرس) و انگیزه‌ها (فاقد انگیزه، پاداش و جریمه) برای تأثیرگذاری بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان ترکیب می‌شوند. داده‌ها با استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه با مشارکت 234 نفر از حسابرسان شاغل در سازمان حسابرسی و موسسات حسابرسی معتمد بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، از طریق نمونه‌گیری تصادفی جمع‌آوری شدند. به منظور بررسی فرضیه‌ها از آزمون تحلیل واریانس و نرم افزار SPSS استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد در غیاب انگیزه، اتخاذ دیدگاه مدیریت، سبب افزایش تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان هنگام بررسی مناسب بودن مفروضات مدیریت، می‌شود و اتخاذ دیدگاه بازرس، سبب افزایش تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان هنگام بررسی نیاز به جمع‌آوری شواهد اضافی، می‌شود. همچنین شواهدی بدست آمده است مبنی بر اینکه استفاده از انگیزه‌ها همراه با اتخاذ دیدگاه سبب افزایش تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان در موقعیت‌های مختلف می‌شود. این پژوهش ادبیات را با تغییر تمرکز از یک دیدگاه واحد به مقایسه دو رویکرد اتخاذ دیدگاه گسترش می‌دهد و در مورد اینکه چگونه هر یک از این رویکردها تردید حرفه‌ای را افزایش می‌دهند، بحث می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Perspective-taking and Incentives on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahboobe Jafari 1
  • Omid Pourheidari 2
  • Ahmad Khodamipour 2
1 Ph.D. Student in Accounting, Faculty of Management & Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management & Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده [English]

An appropriate level of professional skepticism is necessary for a high-quality audit, for this purpose, this paper aims to investigate the effect of two interventions, perspective taking and incentives, on auditors’ professional skepticism when auditing complex estimates. Specifically, this paper examines the different ways that perspective taking (management versus inspector) and incentives (absent versus reward versus penalty) combine to impact skepticism. The statistical population of this research includes all auditors working in trusted audit institutions of Tehran Stock Exchange Organization. The sample of the study consisted of 234 auditors working in trusted audit institutions of Tehran Stock Exchange Organization in 2023 who were selected by random sampling. To investigate hypotheses, an analysis of variance and SPSS software were used. Results indicate that in the absence of incentives, adopting a management perspective raises professional skepticism when measuring skepticism as appropriateness of management’s fair value estimate while adopting an inspector perspective raises professional skepticism when measuring skepticism as need for more evidence. Evidence has also been obtained that the use of incentives along with the adopting a perspective raises the auditors' professional skepticism. This paper extends the literature by shifting the focus from a single perspective to a comparison of two perspective-taking approaches and discusses how each of these approaches enhances professional skepticism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Perspective-taking
  • Incentives
  • Professional skepticism
  • Auditor judgment
بٌبئی ‌فٍشبلی، ‌هطوؽ؛ ‌آقاؼی ّ‌یف، ‌ویْبى؛ ٍ‌عیدفوز، ‌هطوؽـضب. ‌)1400(. ‌هغبلقِ ‌ـاثغِ ‌سیخ‌
ٌػّیشی، ‌سدفثِ ٍ‌ ‌خٌىیز ‌ثب ‌سَاًبیی‌وٍف‌سملت‌ضىبثفن‌)ًم‌ًهیبًدیٌ‌هٍ‌ ‌سفؼیؽ‌
64 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابذاری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
ضففِای(‌،دیٍففزّبی‌ضىبثؽاـی80‌،)13(.100-67‌،
خَاؼی، ًَیؽ؛ فشبضی، ویفٍن‌.)1395(. ثفـوی سبثیف دبؼای هؽیفاى ثف وبغشبـ وفهبیِ ٍ فولىفؼ
هبلی ٌفوزّبی دؿیففشِ ٌؽُ ؼـ ‌ثَـن‌اٍـاق‌ثْبؼاـ ‌سْفاى‌،فّلٌبه‌ِفلوی‌ـاّجفؼ ‌هؽیفیز‌
هبلی14‌،)4(.94-69‌،
ضىیٌی، ضىیی؛ ًیىَهفام، ّبٌن؛ ـضبیی، فلی اوجف. ‌)1399(. ثفـوی سأثیف اثقبؼ ففٌّگی ٍ
هَلفِّبی ـفشبـی ثف سفؼیؽ ضففِای‌ضىبثفوبى‌هىشمل‌،فّلٌبه‌ِفلوی-دمٍٍّی‌ضىبثؽاـی‌
هؽیفیز44‌،)13(.72-55‌،
ضىیٌی‌،ویؽ‌ضىیی؛ ؾوفیبیی‌،هْفاى‌.)1398(‌.سبثیف‌ؼیؽگبُّبی‌سفؼیؽ‌ضففِای‌غٌثی‌ٍ‌وَگیفا‌ًِ
ثف‌دیبهؽّبیٌ‌غلی‌ضىبثفن‌،ؼٍفّلٌبه‌ِضىبثؽاـی‌اـقٌی‌ٍ‌ـفشبـی7‌،)4(.134-103‌،
ؼالٍـ، ‌فلی. ‌)1397(. ‌ـٍی ‌سطمیک ‌ؼـ ‌ـٍاًٌٍبوی ٍ‌ ‌فلَم ‌ـفشبـی ‌)زبح 49‌(، ‌سْفاى: ‌اًشٍبـار‌
ٍیفای.ً
ـٌشسی، همگبى؛ عفیمز، ووبًِ؛ غَیی، ـٍیب‌.)1398(‌.اـسجبط اسػبؾ ؼیؽگبُ ثب ؼٍقثبًگی ٍ خٌىیز‌،
ؼ‌ٍفّلٌبهِ فلن قثبى10،)6(.382-357‌،
وقبؼر‌،اوفٌؽیبـ‌.)1394(‌.هؽیفیز‌هٌبثـ‌اًىبًی‌)زبح20‌(‌،سْفاى‌:اًشٍبـار‌ووز.
ٌیفقاؼ، ثْفام؛ ًیىَهفام، ّبٌن؛ ٍویلی ففؼ، ضویؽـضب. )1399(. ‌خبهقِدؿیفی ضففِای ٍ سفؼیؽ
ضففِای ؼـ ضىبثفوی: ‌آقهَى ًؾفیِ َّ‌یز ‌اخشوبفی، ‌فّلٌبهِ ‌فلوی-دمٍٍّی ‌ؼا‌ًً
ضىبثؽاـی‌ٍ‌ضىبثفوی‌هؽیفیز36‌،)9(.18-1‌،
فجبنقاؼُ ‌یػففٍقاى، ‌اثفاّین؛ ِ‌بلطی، ‌هطوؽـضب. ‌)1397(. ‌ثفـوی ‌فَاهل ‌ایدبؼ ‌اًگیکُ ‌اق‌
ؼیؽگبُّبی‌هػشلفً‌ؾفیِدفؼاقاى‌ضَق‌ُآهَقٌی‌،هدل‌ِثییالوللی دم‌ًٍّهلل، 36)3(-91‌،
.107
فجؽاللْی، ‌فجبن. ‌)1400(. ‌آهبـ ‌اوشٌجبعی ٍ‌ ‌SPSS ؼـ ‌ـٍاىٌٌبوی ٍ‌ ‌فلَم ‌سفثیشی ‌)زبح 1‌(‌،
سْفاى‌:اًشٍبـار‌اـخوٌؽ.
فؽیلی، هدشجی؛ غؽاهیدَـ، اضوؽ؛ دَـضیؽـی، اهیؽ‌.)1399(. ثفـوی سبثیف ففٌّگ اغاللی هَوىِ
ضىبثفوی ٍ سیخّبی ٌػّیشی‌ضىبثفوبى‌ثف‌فیٌیز‌ضىبثفنًٍ‌،فیِ سطمیمبر‌ضىبثؽاـی‌ٍ‌
ضىبثفوی46‌،)12(.20-5‌،
ففٍغی‌،ؼاـیَی؛‌غبلمی‌،هطىی؛‌ـوبئیبى‌،اهیف‌.)1391(‌.هفَْم‌اّویز‌ؼـ‌ضىبثفویَِ‌ـرّبی‌
هبلی‌ٍ‌سبثیف‌آى‌ثف‌سَخ‌ِضىبثفوبى‌ؼـ‌ففآیٌؽ‌وٍف‌سملت‌هؽیفاى‌،دیٍففزّبی‌ضىبثؽاـی‌،
اثر اتخار دیذگاه و انگیسهها بر تردیذ حرفهای حسابرساى 66
.135-111‌،)4(1
لبوویًماؼ، اضىبى؛ ثٌی هْؽ، ثْوی. ‌)1399(. سبثیف هطبفؾِوبـی ثف سفؼیؽ ضففِای ضىبثفوبى
هىشمل‌:آقهًَی اق ًؾفیِ ـٍاًٌٍبویٌ‌ػّیشی‌،ؼا‌ًًضىبثؽاـی‌هبلی، 26)7(.27-1‌،
لبوویًماؼ، اضىبى؛ ثٌی هْؽ، ثْوی؛ ثٍى،َُ هْؽی‌.)1400(. سبثیف ٍیمگی ـفشبـی ففِز‌علجی ثف
سفؼیؽ ضففِای ضىبثفوبى هىشمل: ‌آقهًَی اق ًؾفیِ ـٍاًٌٍبوی ٌػّیشی، هدلِ ؼاًً
ضىبثؽاـی، 44)12(.89-69‌،
لبًَى سدبـر ایفاى‌.)1311(. هدله ٌَـا.
هطممی، ضىیی؛ ؾٍلی دبیؽاـ، هطوؽـضب؛ یقمَثی، اثَالمبون؛ یبـهطوؽی ٍاِل، هىیت؛ هطوؽقاؼ،ُ
وفٍُ ‌)1395(. سؽٍییٍ‌ ‌افشجبـیبثی‌همیبن ؼیؽگبُگیفی اخشوبفی ؼـ ؼاًٍدَیبى، ٌٌ‌بغز
اخشوبفی، 9)5(.34-20‌،
هؽی،ٌِ ‌ویؽ ‌هطىی؛ ‌قاـؿ، ‌ایوبى. ‌)1402(. ‌سأثیف ‌ثبٍـّبی ‌ؼیٌی ‌ثف ‌سفؼیؽ ‌ضففِای ٍ‌ ‌اـقیبثی‌
ضىبثفوبى‌اق ‌غغف‌سطفیف‌ثب‌اّویز: ‌ـٍیىفؼ‌هفاست‌ؼییؼاـی‌اق ‌هٌؾف‌اوالم، هدلِ ‌ؼا‌ًً
ضىبثؽاـی، ؼـًَ‌ثز‌زبح.
یقمَثی، اثَلمبون؛ هطوؽقاؼ،ُ وف.ٍُ ‌)1395(. سؽٍیی ٍ‌ ‌افشجبـیبثی ‌دفٍسىل آهَقی ؼیؽگبُگیفی
اخشوبفی‌ٍ‌اثف‌آى ثف وجهّبی ضل سقبـْ قٍخیی‌، ففٌّگ‌هٍبٍـ‌ٍ‌ُـٍاى‌ؼـهبًی، 28)7(‌،
.131-103
یَوفقاؼ،ُ ًىفیی؛ دَـضیؽـی، اهیؽ؛ غؽاهیدَـ، اضوؽ‌.)1399(. ثفـوی سبثیف اعالفبر ًبهفثَط ٍ
غغبی خکئی ؼـ هؽاـن ِبضجىبـ‌ثف‌اًؽاقُ ًوًَِ ثب سَخِ ثِ ٍیمگی سفؼیؽ ضففِای‌،ؼٍ فّلٌبهِ
ضىبثؽاـی اـقٌی ٍ ـفشبـی، 9)5(.151-117‌،
Abbaszadeh Yakhforozan, E., Salehi, M. (2018). Motivational factors from
different viewpoints of educational theorists. International Journal of
Nations Research, 36(3) (In Persian).
Abdillahi, A. (2021). Inferential statistics & SPSS in psychology & education.
arjmandpub (In Persian).
Adili, M., Khodamipour, A., & Pourheidari, O. (2020). Investigation the effect
of audit firm’s ethical culture and auditors personality types on auditor
objectivity. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Research, 46(12), 5-20 (In
Persian).
Alevy, J., & Price, M. (2011). Asset price paths and trader personality:
66 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابذاری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
Evidence from laboratory experiments. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual
Meeting of the Academy of Behavioral Finance and Economics, September
21-23, 2011, Los Angeles, California.
Altiero, E.C., Kang, Y.J., & Peecher, M.E. (2022). Motivated perspective
taking: Why prompting auditors to take an investors’ perspective make
them treat identified audit differences as less materials. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 39(1), 339-370.
Armstrong, M. (1994). Performance Management, Key Strategies and Practical
Guidelines. Great Britain: Kogan Page Limited.
Asare, S.K., & Wright, A.M. (2019). The effect of a prompt to adopt the
prudent official’s perspective on auditors’ judgments of the severity of
control deficiencies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 38(4), 1-
16.
Backof, A.G., Carpenter, T.D., & Thayer, J. (2018). Auditing complex
estimates: how do construal level and evidence formatting impact auditors’
consideration of inconsistent evidence? Contemporary Accounting
Research, 35(4), 1798-1815.
Baker, George P., Jensen, Michael C., & Murphy, Kevin J. (1987).
Compensation and incentives: practice vs. theory. The Journal of Finance,
43(3), 593-616.
Barrett, L.F., Tugade, M.M., & Engle, R.W. (2004). Individual differences in
working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.
Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 553-573.
Berger, L. (2019). The importance of task complexity when rewarding
nonfinancial performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research,
31(2), 1-17.
Bewley, T. (1995). A depressed labor market as explained by participants. The
American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 85(2), 250-254.
Bonner, S.E. (2008). Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chandra, A., & Frank, Z. (2004). Utilization of performance appraisal systems
in health care organizations and improvement strategies for
supervisors. The health care manager, 23(1), 25-30.
Christ, M.H., Sedatole, K.L., & Towry, K.L. (2012). Sticks and carrots: the
effect of contract frame on effort in incomplete contracts. The Accounting
Review, 87(6), 1913-1938.
Church, B.K., Peytcheva, M., Yu, W., & Singtokul, O.A. (2015). Perspective
taking in auditor manager interactions: an experimental investigation of
اثر اتخار دیذگاه و انگیسهها بر تردیذ حرفهای حسابرساى 66
auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45, 40-51.
Cohen, J. R., Dalton, D. W., & Harp, N. L. (2017). Neutral and presumptive
doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 1-20.
Delavar, A. (2018). Educational and Psychological Research. Virayesh
Publication. Institute (In Persian).
Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. (2006). When perspective taking
increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872-889.
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. European
economic review, 46(4-5), 687-724.
Forughi, D., Khaleghi, M., & Rassaiian, A. (2012). The concept of materiality
in financial statement auditing and its effect on auditor, s attention in
manager’s fraud detecting process. Journal of Accounting Advances, 1(4),
111-135 (In Persian).
Ghaseminezhad, E., & Banimahd, B. (2020). The effect of social conservatism
on professional skepticism of the auditors independent: a test of personality
psychological theory. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 26(7), 1-27 (In
Persian).
Ghaseminezhad, E., Banimahd, B., & Beshkooh, M. (2021). The impact of
machiavellianism behavior on auditor professional skepticism: A test of
personality psychology theory. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 44(12),
69-89 (In Persian).
Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Practitioner summary: Enhancing
auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum.
Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), 1–10.
Griffith, E.E., Hammersley, J.S., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2015b). Auditor
mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research,
53(1), 49-77.
Hamilton, E.L. (2016). Evaluating the intentionality of identified misstatements:
how perspective can help auditors in distinguishing errors from fraud.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(4), 57-78.
Harding, N., & Trotman, K.T. (2017). The effect of partner communications of
fraud likelihood and skeptical orientation on auditors’ professional
skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 36(2), 111-131.
Hosseini, H., Nikoomaram, H., & Rezaei, A. A. (2020). Investigating effect of
cultural and behavioral aspects on auditors professional skepticism.
Management Accounting, 44(13), 55-72 (In Persian).
64 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابذاری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
Hosseini, S. H., Zakariyaei, M. (2019). Neutral and presumptive doubt
perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes. Journal
of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 7(4), 103-134 (In Persian).
Hurrt, R.K., Eining, M., & Plumlee, R.D. (2003). Professional skepticism: A
model with implications for research. Working Paper, University of
Wisconsin-Madison.
Hurtt, R. K., Eining, M., & Plumle, R. D. (2008). An experimental evaluation of
professional skepticism. Working paper, Baylor University.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2006). The
auditors' responsibilities related to fraud in the audit of financial statements.
ISA 240. New York, NY: IFAC.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2012).
Overall objectives of the independt auditor and the conduct of an audit in
accordance with international standards on auditing.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2015).
Invitation to comment – enhancing audit quality in the public interest: a
focus on professional skepticism, quality
control and group audits.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2018).
International standard on auditing 540 (revised): auditing accounting
estimates and related disclosures.
International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR) (2015). 2014
inspection findings survey, The Netherlands.
International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR) (2016). 2015
inspection findings survey, The Netherlands.
Javadi, N., & Fatahi, S. (2016). The effect of the executive compensation on the
capital structure and financial performance of companies listed in Tehran
stock exchange. Journal of Financial Management Strategy, 14(4), 69-94
(In Persian).
Johnson, D.W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 241-244.
Johnson, L.M., Keune, M.B., & Winchel, J. (2019). US auditors’ perceptions of
the PCAOB inspection process: a behavioral examination. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 36(3), 1540-1574.
Johnson, P.D., Smith, M.B., Wallace, J.C., Hill, A.D., & Baron, R.A. (2015). A
review of multilevel regulatory focus in organizations. Journal of
Management, 41(5), 1501-1529.
Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The Actor and the Observer: Divergent
اثر اتخار دیذگاه و انگیسهها بر تردیذ حرفهای حسابرساى 62
Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior, General Learning Press,
Morristown, NJ.
Kim, S., & Trotman, K. T. (2015). The comparative effect of process and
outcome accountability in enhancing professional skepticism. Accounting
and Finance, 55(4), 1015–1040.
Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and
intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2),
383-390.
Madineh, S. M., & Zare, I. (2023). The effect of religious beliefs on
professional skepticism and auditors' assessment of the risk of material
misstatement: With the approach of levels of religiosity from the
perspective of Islam. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, forthcoming (In
Persian).
Mayorga, D., & Trotman, K.T. (2015). The effects of a reasonable investor
perspective and firm’s prior disclosure policy on managers’ disclosure
judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 53, 50-62.
Mohaghegi, H., Zoghi Paidar, M. R., Yaghoobi, A., Yarmohammadi Vasel, M.,
& Mohammadzadeh, S. (2016). Codification and validation of a scale to
measure social perspective taking. Social Cognition, 9(5), 20-34 (In
Persian).
Nelson, M.W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism
in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 1-34.
Pashaei Fashtali, M., Azadi Hir, K., & Vatanparast, M. (2021). The study of the
relationship between personality types, experience, gender, and external
auditors' fraud detection capability (The mediating effects of professional
skepticism). Journal of Accounting Advances, 80(13), 67-100 (In Persian).
Peecher, M.E., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K.T. (2013). An accountability
framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(8), 596-620.
Piaget, J. (1932). The Moral Judgment of the Child, London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2003). Consideration
of fraud in financial statement audits. Auditing Standard No.
2401Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2006). Due
professional care in the performance of work. Auditing Standard No.
1015Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2017). Proposed
61 هجله پیشرفتهای حسابذاری، دوره پانسدهن، شواره دوم، پاییس و زهستاى 2041
auditing standard – auditing accounting estimates, including fair value
measurements and proposed amendments to PCAOB auditing standards
[release no. 2017-002].
Rashtchi, M., Tarighat, S., & Khoii, R. (2020). The relationships between
perspective taking, bilingualism, and gender. Language Science , 10(6),
357-382 (In Persian).
Saadat, E. (2015). Human resource management. Samt (In Persian).
Shirzad, B., Nikomaram, H., & Vakilifard, H. R. (2020). Professional
socialization and professional skepticism in auditing: The theory of social
identity. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing
Knowledge, 36(9), 1-18 (In Persian).
Trotschel, R., Huffmeier, J., Loschelder, D.D., Schwartz, K., & Gollwitzer,
P.M. (2011). Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational
barriers in negotiations: when putting oneself into the opponent’s shoes
helps to walk toward agreements. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 101(4), 771-790.
Uy, K. J. D., Bongcales, T. E. B., Balunan, A. A., Igot, L. O., Laude, J. M. L.,
& Mojados, J. J. D. (2023). Auditor’s professional skepticism and its
relationship with their thinking styles. Recoletos Multidisciplinary
Research Journal, 10(2), 1-1.
Van der Graaff, J. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in
adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental
Psycholog, 50(3), 881-888.
Westermann, K.D., Cohen, J., & Trompeter, G. (2019). PCAOB inspections:
public accounting firms on ‘trial. Contemporary Accounting Research,
36(2), 694-731.
Yaghoobi, A., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2016). Construction and validation of
the educational protocol of Social Perspective-taking and analyzes of its
efficacy on couple’s conflict resolutions styles. Counseling Culture and
Psycotherapy, 28(7), 103-131 (In Persian).
Ying Ho, Sh., Phang, S.Y., & Moroney, R. (2021). The combined effect of
perspective-taking and incentives on professional skepticism. Managerial
Auditing Journal, 37(1), 129-150.
Yousefzadeh, N., Pourheidari, O., Khodamipour, A. (2020). Irrelevant
information, minor error, dirty documents, skeptical action, trait
professional skepticism. Journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 9(5),
117-151 (In Persian).