تاثیر واگرایی عقاید سرمایه گذاران بر قیمت گذاری نادرست سهام با توجه به نقش کیفیت اطلاعات مالی و عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی در بازار سرمایه ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

واگرایی عقیده نوعی اختلاف باورها است که در آن تخمین سرمایه‌گذاران از ارزش دارایی متفاوت است، در واقع، واگرایی عقاید به تفاوت در برداشت سرمایه‌گذاران بازار از سهام یک شرکت اشاره دارد. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی تاثیر واگرایی عقاید سرمایه-گذاران بر قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام با توجه به نقش کیفیت اطلاعات مالی و عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی در بازار سرمایه ایران است. پژوهش حاضر از منظر روش شناختی، از نوع تعامل علّی است. بورس تهران به عنوان جامعه نهایی آماری انتخاب و با استفاده از معیارهای چندگانه حذف سیستماتیک، 127 شرکت در بازه زمانی 10 ساله بین سال‌های 1391 الی 1400 است در نمونه نهایی لحاظ گردید، که به دلیل اینکه دوره 1400 در محاسبات دیتاهای خام مورد استفاده قرار گرفته، بنابراین از 9 سال برای آزمون‌های آماری استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل از آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش نشان داد که واگرایی عقاید سرمایه‌گذاران تاثیر مستقیم بر قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام دارد. ضمن اینکه تعامل عدم‌تقارن اطلاعاتی و کیفیت اطلاعات مالی با واگرایی عقاید سرمایه‌گذاران بر قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام تاثیرگذار نمی‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of divergent opinions of investors on the incorrect pricing of stocks with regard to the role of financial information quality and information asymmetry in the Iranian capital market

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolrasoul Rahmanian Koushkaki 1
  • Armin Saffar 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 MSc, Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University .Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
 
Proponents of behavioral finance theory believe that the phenomenon of stock mispricing is persistent and is due to an irrational (behavioral) component of stock prices or information asymmetry between participants. Therefore, the difference of opinions and the opinions of investors can affect the stock price. Difference of opinion is a kind of inconsistency related to investors, in which investors' estimation of the value of assets is different, in fact, difference of opinion refers to the difference in the views of investors in the market about the shares of companies. In previous researches, it has been stated that stocks that face the most disagreement among investors show lower returns in the announcement of profits, so these two phenomena cannot be separated from each other.
 
 
Hypotheses
 
The thoughts and opinions of investors about the future of the capital market can have an effective role on the price trend and volume of market transactions. The thoughts and opinions of investors refer to their views on the future state of the capital market. In classical economics, there is a belief that people's behavior is based on rational expectations, and the meaning of rational expectations is based on the assumption that different classes and groups pay attention to all available information that affects the results of their decisions and use it intelligently. Therefore, they never make mistakes regularly. Market information strengthens the co-movement of stock prices, while firm-specific information weakens it. A significant part of stock mispricing can be attributed to lack of information transparency at the company level. Information asymmetry is considered as a type of market failure because when this factor exists in the market, it affects not only the market value as a whole but also the market value of companies in the stock market. In the behavioral finance literature, it has been stated that different opinions and opinions in the market regarding investment are derived from different trends and estimates regarding the expected return from investments. This heterogeneity in opinions regarding expected returns can be due to insufficient information in the market due to non-disclosure of necessary information by managers and companies. The movement of the stock price actually reflects the behavior of the investors in that market. According to the contents, the hypotheses of the present research are stated as follows:
H1: There is a positive and significant relationship between the divergence of investors' opinions and incorrect stock pricing.
H2: Information asymmetry intensifies the positive relationship between the divergence of investors' opinions and incorrect stock pricing.
H3: The quality of financial information weakens the positive relationship between the divergence of investors' opinions and stock mispricing.
 
 
Method
 
The current research is applied and from the methodological point of view, correlation is causal type (post-event). The statistical population under investigation in this research is all the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange and the period under investigation is from 2012 to 2021. In this research, the systematic elimination method was used to reach the sample, and 127 companies were selected as the research sample. Data analysis has been done by using the combined data method and with the data panel approach and by using Eviews 12 software to test the hypotheses.
 
 
Results
 
The results of the research hypotheses test showed that the divergence of investors' opinions aggravates the phenomenon of incorrect stock pricing. In addition, information asymmetry and the quality of financial information aggravate incorrect pricing. However, their interaction with the divergence of investors' opinions did not show any effect on incorrect stock pricing.
 
 
Discussion and Conclusion
 
The behavior and opinions of investors is the most prominent factor determining the price of assets and stocks, especially in emerging markets. It is difficult to obtain a fair valuation in the conditions of market uncertainty, which is the root of creating different opinions and opinions in the market about buying and selling stocks. Divergence of investors' opinions and behavior has a consistent relationship with incorrect stock valuation. In fact, when the difference of opinions and opinions between investors in the capital market increases, at the same time, the incorrect pricing of stocks will increase and stocks will be traded at a price different from the intrinsic value of stocks, because investors rely on their information. They will buy and sell shares, which can influence the behavior and opinions of investors. Information asymmetry can lead to wrong investment and financial decisions with the loss of investors and companies' stock value. The obtained results showed that the more our information inequality between internal managers and external investors increases, the incorrect pricing of stocks can also increase. However, the interaction of information asymmetry and divergence of opinions cannot intensify the incorrect pricing of stocks. The reason for this factor can be stated based on behavioral finance theories, that information asymmetry itself is a factor in intensifying the divergence of capital opinions. It has aggravated this factor from the very beginning, and now, with the interaction of these two variables, there is no noticeable change in the incorrect pricing of stocks. A higher quality of financial information can reduce mispricing of stocks. In fact, the inverse relationship between the quality of financial information and mispricing can be explained by improving the quality of information issued by companies. The information between inside and outside the company is reduced and finally the investors will buy and sell shares relying on the correct information, which can somehow bring the stock pricing closer to its intrinsic value. But finally, with the interaction of the quality of financial information and the divergence of investors' opinions, it was observed that the incorrect pricing of stocks will not intensify.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • incorrect stock pricing
  • information asymmetry
  • transparency of financial information
  • divergence of opinions and behavior of investors
  • financial and behavioral

مراجع

الف. فارسی
ابراهیمی، سیدکاظم؛ بهرامی نسب، علی؛ جعفری پور، خدیجه. (1395). بررسی تاثیر کیفیت حسابداری بر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی با در نظر گرفتن چرخه عمر شرکت ها. دانش حسابداری مالی، 3(1)، 93-110.
بادآورنهندی، یونس؛ سرافراز، الهه. (1397). ارتباط بین قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام و میزان سرمایه‌گذاری‌های شرکت با تأکید بر نقش محدودیت‌های مالی و افق زمانی سرمایه‌گذاری سهامداران. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار. 11(37)، 119-137.
بذرافشان، وجیهه؛ بذرافشان، آمنه؛ صالحی، مهدی. (1397). بررسی اثرگذاری خودشیفتگی مدیران بر کیفیت گزارشگری مالی. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 25(4)، 457 -478.
ترابی، ایرج؛ دستگیر، محسن؛ کیانی، غلامحسین. (1399). اثر تعدیل‌کنندگی عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و بازار رقابت ناقص بر شدّت تأثیرگذاری قابلیت مقایسه و ثبات رویه بر هزینة سرمایۀ سهام عادی. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی. 12(2)، 1-22.
تقی زاده، نفیسه؛ حمیدیان، محسن؛ نوراله زاده، نوروز. (1400). واگرایی نظران و اثر تعدیلی توجه و مشارکت سرمایه‌گذاران به بازار عرضه اولیه سهام. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، 14(49)، 41-56.
جودی، سمیرا؛ منصورفر، غلامرضا. (1399). نقش کیفیت حسابرسی بر رابطۀ بین عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و ابعاد آگاهی‌دهندگی و فریبندگی مدیریت سود. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی. 12(1)، 19-38.
خدادادی، ولی؛ نوروزی، محمد. (1395). قیمت گذاری نادرست سهام و رفتار سرمایه گذاری شرکت ها. شواهدی از نظریه ارضای سهامداران. پیشرفت های حسابداری، 8(2)، 93-122.
رشیدی باغی، محسن. (1398). نقش کیفیت حسابرسی و کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری در تغییر قیمت گذاری عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 6(3)، 167-187.
رستمی، وهاب؛ مهرآور، مهدی؛ کارگر، حامد. (1401). تاثیر مدیریت ریسک بر سرعت تعدیل اهرم مالی در مراحل چرخه عمر شرکت­­ها. پیشرفت­های حسابداری،  14(1)، 59-88.
کردستانی، غلامرضا؛ ابراهیمی، تهمینه. (1392). بررسی رابطه بین کیفیت افشا و قیمت‌گذاری نادرست اقلام تعهدی و جریان نقدی. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 5(19)، 38-53.
کرمی، غلامرضا؛ فرج زاده، مریم. (1394). بررسی رابطه بین عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و قیمت‌گذاری نادرست اقلام تعهدی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 12(48)، 77-104.
مروی، راضیه؛ توانگر حمزه کلایی، افسانه؛ حیدر پور، فرزانه؛  روحی، علی. (1402). بررسی تاثیر ارتباطات سیاسی شرکت­ها با دولت و عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر نوسان پذیری کوتاه مدت و بلند مدت قیمت سهام بعد از عرضه اولیه. دانش سرمایه‌گذاری، 12(48). 329-360.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ امینی، یاسین. (1401). ارایه مدل عوامل موثر بر قیمت گذاری کمتر از واقع در عرضه های اولیه با تاکید بر نقش اطلاعات حسابداری. پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری، 12(2)، 175-214.
موسوی شیری، سید محمود؛ خلعت بری، حسن؛ فیروز بخت، مینا. (1394). اثر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر بیش‌ارزشیابی سهام. پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 7(27)، 73-92.
نوروزی، محمد؛ خدادادی، ولی. (1395). هزینه نمایندگی جریان نقد آزاد و قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی ، 8(2)، 85-100.
نیکبخت، محمدرضا؛ احمدخان بیگی، مصطفی. (1397). تأثیر حاکمیت شرکتی بر کیفیت گزارشگری مالی: رویکرد یکپارچه. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 25(3)، 433-455.
نیکو، هانیه؛ ابراهیمی، سید کاظم؛ جلالی، فاطمه. (1399). گرایش احساسی سرمایه‌گذار، نوسان‌پذیری غیرسیستماتیک و قیمت‌گذاری نادرست سهام در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. راهبرد مدیریت مالی، 8(1)، 65-85.
نیکومرام، هاشم؛ انصاری، جواد. (1390). عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و اهمیت ویژگی کیفی اطلاعات حسابداری مابین هر یک از استفاده کنندگان و تهیه کنندگان اطلاعات. مطالعات کمی در مدیریت، 2(7)، 7-39
وقفی، سیدحسام؛ اشکوه، آزاده. (1400). بررسی تاثیر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر قیمت گذاری نادرست سهام با تاکید بر نقش ارتباط سیاسی شرکت. پیشرفت­های حسابداری، 13(2)، 325-358.
ب. انگلیسی
Agarwal, S., Liu, C., & Rhee, S. G. (2008). Investor demand for IPOs and aftermarket performance: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 176-190.‏
Aiyabei, J. C. (2021). Effect of Financial Statement Information on Idiosyncratic Volatility of Stock Returns among Listed Firms in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).‏
Albada, A., Low, S. W., & Toh, M. Y. (2022). Divergence of beliefs and IPO initial return: the quasi-moderating role of investor demand. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies.‏
 Badavar Nahandi, Y., & Sarafraz, E. (2018). The Relationship between Stock Mispricing and Corporate Investments with Emphasis on the Role of Financial Constraints and Time Horizon of Stockholders Investment. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 11(37), 119-132. (In persian).
Bazrafshan, V., Bazrafshan, A., & Salehi, M. (2018). Investigating the Influence of Managers' Narcissism on Financial Reporting Quality. Accounting and Auditing Review, 25(4), 457-478. (In persian).
 Chen, L., Wang, J., Wu, C., & Zhu, H. (2022). Divergent opinion, trading information, and stock price co-movements. In Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance, 8(12), 1-21.
 Chen, L., Wang, J., Wu, C., & Zhu, H. (2020). Divergent opinion, trading information, and stock price co-movements. In Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance (pp. 1-21). Emerald Publishing Limited.‏
Chi, J. D., & Gupta, M. (2009). Overvaluation and earnings management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(9), 1652-1663.‏
Duong, H. N., Kalev, P. S., & Tian, X. (2023). Short selling, divergence of opinion and volatility in the corporate bond market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 147, 104592.‏
 Ebrahimi, S K; Bahrami Nasab, A; Jafaripour, Kh. (2016). Investigating the effect of accounting quality on information asymmetry considering the life cycle of companies. Knowledge Of Financial Accounting, (3)1, 93-110(In persian).
He, M., Huang, J., & Zhu, H. (2021). Heterogeneous beliefs and idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: evidence from China. China Finance Review International, 11(1), 124-141.‏
Joudi, S., & Mansourfar, G. (2020). The role of audit quality on the relationship between information asymmetry and both informative and deceptive dimensions of income smoothing. Financial Accounting Research, 12(1), 19-38. (In persian).
 karami, G., & farajzadeh, M. (2015). Examining Relationship between Information Asymmetry and Mispricing of Accruals. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 12(48), 77-104. (In persian).
Khan, N. U., & Khan, S. (2016). Weak Form of Efficient Market Hypothesis â?? Evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 8(1), 1-18.‏
Khodadadi, V., & Norouzi, M. (2017). Stock mispricing and firms investment behavior: Evidence from stockholders catering theory. Journal of Accounting Advances, 8(2), 93-122. (In persian).
Kordestani, G., & Ebrahimi, T. (2013). Disclosure Quality and Mispricing of Accruals and Cash Flows. Accounting and Auditing Research, 5(19), 38-53. (In persian).
Low, S. W., & Yong, O. (2011). Initial public offerings and investor heterogeneity: Evidence from Malaysia. American Journal of Finance and Accounting 16, 3(1), 41-56.‏
Mehmood, W., Mohd-Rashid, R., Che-Yahya, N., & Ong, C. Z. (2020). Determinants of heterogeneity in investors' opinions on IPO valuation: evidence from the Pakistan stock market. Review of Behavioral Finance, 13(5), 631-646.‏
Marvi, R., Tavangar Hamzekolaie, A., Heidarpoor, F., & Rohy, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of companies' political relations with the government and information asymmetry on short-term and long-term stock price volatility after initial public offering. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 12(48), 329-360. (In persian).
Mashayekhi, B., & Amini, Y. (2022). A Model of Factors Affecting Underpricing in IPOs Focusing Accounting Information Role. Empirical Research in Accounting, 12(2), 175-214. (In persian).
Mousavi Shiri, S. M., Khalat Bari, H, & Firoz Bakht, M. (2015). The effect of information asymmetry on stock overvaluation. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 7(27), 73-92. (In persian).
Nikbakht, M. R., & Ahmadkhanbeigi, M. (2018). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Reporting Quality: Integrated Approach. Accounting and Auditing Review, 25(3), 433-455. (In persian).
Nikoo, H., Ebrahimi, K., & Jalali, F. (2020). The Relationship Between Investor Sentiment and Idiosyncratic Risk with Stock Mispricing: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Management Strategy, 8(1), 65-85. (In persian).
Nikumaram, H., Ansari, J. (2012). Information asymmetry and the importance of qualitative features of accounting information between each of the users and providers of information. Quantitative Studies in Management, 2(7), 7-39. (In persian).
Norouzi, M., & Khodadadi, V. (2016). Agency Costs of Free Cash flow and Stock Mispricing in Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Accounting Research, 8(2), 85-100. (In persian).
Peng, E. Y., Yan, A., & Yan, M. (2016). Accounting accruals, heterogeneous investor beliefs, and stock returns. Journal of Financial Stability, 24, 88-103.‏
 Rashidi baqhi, M. (2019). The role of audit quality and the quality of accounting information in changing the information asymmetry pricing. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(3), 167-187. (In persian).
Rehman, S., & Qamar, M. R. (2014). Testing weak form efficiency of capital markets: A case of Pakistan. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 3(1), 65-73.‏
 Rostami, V., Mehravar, M., & Kargar, H. (2022). The effect of risk management on the speed of adjusting financial leverage in the life cycle stages of companies. Journal of Accounting Advances, 14(1), 59-88. (In persian).
Shen, F., Guo, Q., Liang, H. and Liu, Z. (2022). Responses in divergence of opinion to earnings announcements: evidence from American depository receipts, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-08-2021-0375
Silva, D., & Cerqueira, A. (2021). Divergence of Opinion and Idiosyncratic Volatility. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 23, 654-676.‏
 taghizade, N., hamidian, M., & Nourollahzadeh, N. (2021). The divergence of opinion and moderating effect of investor's attention and participation in IPO. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 14(49), 41-56. (In persian).
Torabi, I., Dastgir, M., & Kiani, G. H. (2020). The Moderating Effect of Information Asymmetry and Imperfect Market on the Impact Severity of Comparability and Accounting Consistency on the Cost of Equity Capital in Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Accounting Research, 12(2), 1-22. (In persian). 
Vagfi, S. H., & Oshkooh, A. (2021). Investigating the effect of information asymmetry on incorrect stock pricing with emphasis on the role of corporate political communication. Journal of Accounting Advances, 13(2), 387-419. (In persian).
 Yong, O., & Albada, A. (2018). Under-pricing and listing board in explaining heterogeneity of opinion regarding values of Malaysian IPOs. Jurnal Pengurusan, 51(1), 63-72.‏
 
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 شهریور 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار