تبیین دیدگاه مبادله اجتماعی در گرایش به افشای تخلف های حسابداری در سایه صفات پنهان شخصیت نظارت کنندگان مالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده: تخلف­های حسابداری و گزارشگری مالی از ابعاد گوناگون فردی و سازمانی آسیب­رسان و چالش‌برانگیز هستند. برای روبرو شدن با آن‌ها، افشای تخلف­های­مالی می­تواند یک راهکار مؤثر در این زمینه باشد. افشای تخلف­ها را می­توان نمونه­ای از راست‌گویی، درستکاری، آشکارسازی و پاسخگویی اخلاقی، قانونی و حرفه­ای در برابر گونه­های تخلف­ پنهان و پیدا برای پشتیبانی از منافع سازمانی و همگانی نام برد. در این راستا، هدف پژوهش شناسایی اثر دیدگاه مبادله اجتماعی در افشای تخلف­های حسابداری در سایه صفات پنهان شخصیت نظارت‌کنندگان مالی است. در این پژوهش جامعه آماری گروه­های گوناگون حسابرسان مستقل، داخلی و سایر اشخاصی بود که به نحوی در نظارت، کنترل و بازرسی مشارکت داشتند، نمونه آماری به‌صورت تصادفی و به تعداد 249 نفر در دوره زمانی 1400 انتخاب‌شده است. تحلیل متغیرهای موردبررسی در مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری نشان می­دهد که صفات پنهان شخصیت (ماکیاولیسم، خودشیفتگی، جامعه­ستیزی، دگرآزاری و کینه‌توزی) و مبادله اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت معنا­دار در افشای تخلف­های مالی دارند. یافته دیگر پژوهش حاکی از آن است که صفات پنهان بر مبادله اجتماعی اثر مثبت معنادار ندارد. درنتیجه، مبادله اجتماعی نقش میانجیگری بین صفات تاریک و افشای تخلفات را نشان نمی­دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explain the perspective of social exchange in the willingnees to Whistleblowing of accounting misconducts in the shadow of dark personality traits of fianacial monitors

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ganbar Heydari 1
  • Hashem Nikoomaram 2
  • Bahman Banimahd 3
  • Hamidreza Vakilifard 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Islamic Azad University-Science and Research Branch
3 Associate Professor of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The aim of this study is to test the social exchange perspective of willingness to do whistleblowing on financial misconducts along with the five variables of dark personality traits. Because there are gaps and unfulfilled expectations about the role and performance of regulatory and control institutions and stockholder, stakeholders, researchers, analysts and other gatekeepers, legislation, judiciary and members of society (importance of external whistleblowing).
 
 Research Hypothesis
In this study, whistleblowing on misconducts as a dependent variable, dark traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism, and spitefulness) as an independent variable and social exchange perspective as a mediating variable between the independent and dependent variables are studied. Thus, the following hypothesis is provided:
Hypothesis 1: Dark personality traits have a significant positive effect on the tendency to whistleblow on misconducts.
Hypothesis 2: Dark personality traits have a significant positive effect on social exchange.
Hypothesis 3: Social exchange has a significant positive effect on the whistleblowing on misconducts.
Hypothesis 4: Social exchange has a significant positive effect  between dark traits and whistleblowing on misconducts.
 
  Research Methods
Data collection tool is a standard questionnaire with two sections of demography (6 questions) and test of variables (44 questions) and is measured using Likert scale (numerical value 1 to 5). The analysis in the software is based on partial least squares (Smart-PLS) and structural equation modeling. Its statistical population included regulators, controllers, inspectors and generally gatekeepers in the number of 249 in 2021.
 
 Results of hypothesis
Data analysis in the modeling of structural rates shows that the first hypothesis has not been rejected with the standard coefficient .474 and confidence level 9.091. Also, the finding of the second hypothesis shows that it has been rejected with the standard coefficient .0009 and confidence level .111. But the result of the third hypothesis indicates that it has not been rejected with the standard coefficient .124 and confidence level 2.023. Also, another result indicates that the social exchange perspective does not play a mediating role between dark traits and whistleblowing on misconducts.
 
 Discussion and Conclusion
     Fraudulent behaviors have affected individuals and organizations from various dimensions. In this regard, various individuals and organizations are responsible for monitoring and control (detecting and financial reporting misconducts to increase the quality of financial reporting) of financial reporting. But the monitoring system faces a wide range of bottlenecks and shortcomings. Despite the numerous monitoring and control systems, it has created many challenges for the officials of organizations in different categories. In this context, the issue of whistleblowing of misconduct or silence are multiple, complex and interdisciplinary dimensions. In this regard, there may be conflicting views between researchers and experts on the technical (standards, guidelines, and rules) and behavioral aspects. But dark personality traits and social exchange perspectives can play an important positive and negative role in this regard according to theoretical and practical concepts.
 
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • whistleblowing of accounting misconducts
  • social exchange
  • drak personality traits
  • financail monitors

مراجع

الف. فارسی
آذر، عادل، و مؤمنی، منصور. (1395). آمار و کاربرد آن در مدیریت، جلد اول. تهران: سمت.
پاشائی فشتالی، محمد، آزادی­هیر، کیهان، و وطن­پرست، محمدرضا. (1400). مطالعه رابطه تیپ شخصیتی، تجربه و جنسیت با توانایی کشف تقلب حسابرس. دو فصلنامه پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 13(1)،‎67-100.
حبیبی، آرش، و عدن­ور مریم. (1396). مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری و تحلیل عاملی (آموزش کاربردی نرم‌افزار LISREL). تهران: سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
دیباکیا، پریا، بنی مهد،  بهمن، شکری چشمه سبزی، اعظم، و مرادزاده­­فرد، مهدی. (1400). نقش تعدیل‌گر جنسیت بر رابطه رشد اخلاقی حسابداران و تمایل به گزارش تخلفات مالی. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 13(1)، 131-159.
رضازاده، فرزانه، رضایی، فرزین، و حمیدی ناصر. (1400). تأثیر خودکارآمدی، منبع‌کنترل و ویژگی‌های تاریک شخصیت بر گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. دو فصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، ۵(۱۰)، 131-167.
زنگی­آبادی، مصطفی، و نصیرزاده، فرزانه .(1400). سبک رهبری اخلاقی و ابعاد شخصیت تاریک افراد مؤثر در مدیریت سود. مجله بین­المللی اخلاق و علوم، 2(3)، 47-58.
قاسمی­نژاد، احسان، بنی­مهد، بهمن، و بشکوه، مهدی. (1400). تأثیر ویژگی رفتاری فرصت­طلبی بر تریدید حرفه­ای حسابرسان مستقل: آزمونی از نظریه روانشناسی شخصیتی. دانش حسابداری، 1(44)، 69-89.
کدخدایی­الیادرانی، مژده، و بنی­مهد، بهمن. (1401). تأثیر جنسیت حسابرس داخلی بانک­های دولتی بر رابطه میان عواطف و گزارش تخلفات. دو فصلنامه علمی حسابداری دولتی، 2(16)، 73-80.
محمدرضایی، فخرالدین. (1397). روش پژوهش در حسابداری. تهران: ترمه.
نمازی، محمد، و ابراهیمی، فهیمه. (1396). بررسی تأثیر سازه‌های فردی و اجتماعی بر شدت اخلاقی ادراک شده توسط حسابداران. دو فصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، ۲(۴)، 97-121
هومن، حیدرعلی. (1395). شناخت روش علمی در علوم رفتاری، تهران: سمت.
 
ب. انگلیسی
Alshoubaki, W. E., & Harris, M. (2022). Striving for protection: Whistleblowers in Jordan. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-7.
Aprillia, W., & Maharani, S. N. (2021). The Dark triad and ethical behavior. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 173(2), 308-320.
Azar, A, & Momeni, M. (2015). Statistics and its application in management, first volume. Tehran: Semt. (In Persian).
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. ‏
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193.
Bracht, J., & Zylbersztejn, A. (2018). Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences: an experimental study. Theory and Decision, 85(3), 389-406. ‏
Church, B. K., Dai, N. T., Kuang, X., & Liu, X. (2020). The role of auditor narcissism in auditor client negotiations: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3), 1756-1787.
Chwolka, A., & Oelrich, S. (2020). Whistleblowing as a means for the prevention and detection of fraud in Germany-amidst heroes and informers. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 72(4),1-187.
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Morrison, R. L. (2018). Give and take: Needed updates to social exchange theory. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 493-498. ‏
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of management annals, 11(1), 479-516. ‏
Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Soliman, A. (2012). ‘Spite effects’ in tax evasion experiments. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 418-423.
Davlembayeva, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). Reciprocity and social exchange in the sharing economy. 18th Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society: Trondheim Norway.
Detzen, D., & Gold, A. (2021). The different shades of audit quality: A review of the aca-demic literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 95(1/2), 5-15.
Dibakia, P., Bani-Mahd, B., Shokri, C. S. A., & Moradzadeh F. M. (2021). Moderating role of gender on the relationship between accountants’ level of moral development and their whistleblowing intentions. Journal of Accounting Advances, 13(1), 131-159. (In Persian).
D'Souza, M. F., Aragão, I. R. B. N., & De Luca, M. M. M. (2018). Analysis of the occurrence of Machiavellian and narcissistic discourse in the management reports of firms involved in financial scandals. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 12(3), 1-20. ‏
Dwiyanti, D. A., Wicaksono, A. P. N., & Ulum, I. (2022). Internal control system, whistleblowing system, organizational commitment and fraud prevention: individual morality as a moderating variable. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 172-188.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868.
Forber, P., & Smead, R. (2016). The evolution of spite, recognition, and morality. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 884-896.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fredin, A. (2012). The unexpected cost of staying silent: not blowing the whistle may seem like the easy way out, but those who choose silence pay a price. Strategic Finance, 93(10), 53-60. ‏
Furnham, A. Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and personality psychology compass, 7(3), 199-216. ‏
Ghasemi-Nejad, E., Bani-Mahed, B, & Bashkoh, M. (2021). The effect of opportunistic behavior on the professional triad of independent auditors: a test of personality psychology theory. Accounting Knowledge, 1(44), 69-89. (In Persian).
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2016). Social psychology. Fourth edition. New York: Norton & Company.
Góis A D, Lima G A S F D, De Luca M M M., (2020), Everyday sadism in the business area. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3): 393-408.
Greene, R. W., Horvath, D., & Browning, L. (2021). Truth-Telling and organizational democracy: the rhetoric of whistleblowing as an act of parrhesia. In whistleblowing, communication and consequences. New York: Routledge. ‏
Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53-107.
Groenewald, L. (2020). Whistleblowing management handbook. Pretoria, South Africa: The Ethics Institute(TEI).
Habibi, A., & Adenvar, M. (2016). Structural equation modeling and factor analysis (practical training of LISREL software). Tehran: Academic Jahad Publishing Organization. (In Persian).
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 320-340.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Harris, L. L., Jackson, S. B., Owens, J., & Seybert, N. (2022). Recruiting dark personalities for earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics,178(1), 193-218.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. ‏
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In new challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ‏
Herda, D. N., & Lavelle, J. J. (2022). How and why auditors’ social exchange relationships influence their attitudes and behaviors: Implications for audit quality. Business Horizons, 65(3), 245-249.
Hobson, J. L., Stern, M. T., & Zimbelman, A. F. (2020). The benefit of mean auditors: the influence of social interaction and the dark triad on unjustified auditor trust. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1217-1247.
Holtom, B., Baruch, Y., Aguinis, H., & A Ballinger, G. (2022). Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework. Human Relations, 75(8), 1560- 1584.
Homan, H. A. (2015). Knowing the scientific method in behavioral sciences, Tehran: Semat. (In Persian).
Homans, G.  C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Jalan, I. (2020). Treason or reason? Psychoanalytical insights on whistleblowing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(3), 249-263. ‏
Jeppesen, K. K., & Leder, C. (2016). Auditors’ experience with corporate psychopaths. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 870-881.
Johnson, Eric N., Lowe, D. Jordan, Reckers, Philip M.J. (2021). The influence of auditor narcissism and moral disengagement on risk assessments of a narcissistic client CFO. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(4),1-31.
Kadkhodaee, E. M., & Bani-Mahd, B. (2022). The effect of gender of internal auditor in state-owned banks on the relationship between moods and whistle-blowing. Biannual Journal of Scientific Governmental Accounting, 8(2), 73-80. (In Persian).
Kaiser, M. I., & Müller, C. (2021). What is an animal personality? Biology & Philosophy, 36(1), 1-25.
Lee, G., & Xiao, X. (2018). Whistleblowing on accounting-related misconduct: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41(1), 22-46. ‏
Lee, H., Kang, M. M., & Kim, S. Y. (2021). A psychological process of bureaucratic whistleblowing: applying the theory of planned behavior. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(5), 374-392. ‏
Li, S., Jain, K., & Tzini, K. (2022). When supervisor support backfires: The link between perceived supervisor support and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 133-151.
Lyons, B. D., Bowling, N. A., & Burns, G. N. (2022). Accentuating dark triad behavior through low organizational commitment: a study on peer reporting. Ethics & Behavior, 32(1), 32-43.
Marçal, R. R., & Alberton, L. (2020). Relationship between Dark Triad personality traits and professional skepticism among independent auditors. ‏ REPeC, Brasília, 14(4), 480-500.
Marcus, D. K., & Zeigler‐Hill, V. (2015). A big tent of dark personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(8), 434-446.
Mohammad, R, F. (2017). Research method in accounting. Tehran: Termeh. (In Persian).
Mohd-Zeamlee, S. N., ALI, M. M., & Hasnan, S. (2022). Perceptions of Moral Intensity and Professional Commitment towards Intention to Whistleblowing: Empirical Evidence from Malaysian Public Sector Organisations. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(6), 53-67.
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656-688. ‏
Myers, D. G., Abell, J., & Sani, F. (2014). Social psychology. London: McGraw Hill. ‏
Namazi M, & Ebrahimi, F. (2018). Investigating the effect of personal and social factors on the perceived moral intensity by accountants. Quarterly Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 97-121. (In Persian).
Namazi, M., & Ebrahimi, F. (2017). A Study of accountant’s whistle-blowing intention: evidence from Iran”. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 12(4), 349-373
Nguyen, T. V., Doan, M. H., & Tran, N. H. (2022). Obligation-based bribes in Vietnam:A view from the norm of reciprocity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 78(1), 125–144.
Oelrich, S. (2021). Intention without action? Differences between whistleblowing intention and behavior on corruption and fraud. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 30(3), 447-463.
Oelrich, S., & Erlebach, K. (2021). Taking it outside: A study of legal contexts and external whistleblowing in China and India. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 129-151. ‏
Øverenget, E., & Hole, Å. S. (2021). Whistleblowing, Communication and Conseque-nces, Lessons from The Norwegian National Lottery; Ethical Blindness as an Expl-anation for Non-Reporting of Organizational Wrongdoing. New York: Routledge. ‏
Palmer, J. C., Komarraju, M., Carter, M. Z., & Karau, S. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the dark triad traits and counterproductive work behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 110(4), 31-37.
Pashaei-Fashtali., M., Azadi-Hir, K. A., & Vatanparast, M. (2021). The study of the relationship between personality types, experience, gender, and external auditors' fraud detection capability (The mediating effects of professional skepticism). Journal of Accounting Advances, 13(1), 67-100. (In Persian).
Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208-222.
Prysmakova, P., & Evans, M. D. (2022). Whistleblowing motivation and gender: Vignette-based study in a local government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 165-190.
Rani, U., Pramudyastuti, O. L., & Nugraheni, A. P. (2022). Disclosing the practice of whistleblowing system in Indonesia’s public listed companies. INOVASI, 18, 79-87.
Rashid, M. A., Al-Mamun, A., Roudaki, H., & Yasser, Q. R. (2022). An overview of corporate fraud and its prevention approach. Australasian. Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 16(1), 101-118.
Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 487-496. ‏
Rezazadeh, F., Rezaei, F., & Hamidi, N. (2021). The effect of self-efficacy, locus of control and dark personality traits on fraudulent financial reporting. Two Quarterly Journals of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 5(10), 131-167. (In Persian).
Richardson, B. K. (2021). Hero or “Prince of Darkness”? Locating Peer Jacob Svenkerud in an attributions-based typology of whistleblowers. In whistleblowing, communication and consequences. New York: Routledge
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: the importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.
Scheetz, A. M. (2018). The effect of peer reciprocal relationships and interpersonal affect on internal fraud reporting. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 10(2), 225-249.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Wadsworth: Cengage. ‏
Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837-867. ‏
Smaili, N., & Arroyo, P. (2019). Categorization of whistleblowers using the whistleblowing triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(1), 95-117. ‏
Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent financial reporting in ministerial and governmental institutions in Indonesia: An analysis using hexagon theory. Economies, 10(4), 1-14.
Taylor, E. Z., & Curtis, M. B. (2010). An examination of the layers of workplace influences in ethical judgments: Whistleblowing likelihood and perseverance in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 21-37.
Trémolière, B., & Djeriouat, H. (2016). The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment. Cognition, 146(3), 158-171. ‏
Waters, S. (2020). The ethical algorithm: Journalist/whistleblower relationships explor-ed through the lens of social exchange. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 22(3), 172-245. ‏
Xiuguo, W., & Shengyong, D. (2022). An analysis on financial statement fraud detection for chinese listed companies using deep learning. IEEE Access, 10(2), 22516-22532.
Zangi-Abadi, A., M., & Nasirzadeh, F. (2021). Ethical leadership style and dark personality dimensions of people effective in profit management. International Journal of Ethics and Sciences, 2(3), 47-58. (In Persian).
Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Y., Emanuels, J., Gold, A., & Wallage, P. (2021). Audit committee strength and auditors' risk assessments: The moderating role of CEO narcissism. International Journal of Auditing, 25(3), 661-674.
Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Hilbig, B. E. (2021). Stability and change: The dark factor of personality shapes dark traits. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 974-983.‏
Zhang, M. F., Dawson, J. F., & Kline, R. B. (2021). Evaluating the use of covariance‐based structural equation modelling with reflective measurement in organizational and management research: A review and recommendations for best practice. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 257-272.
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 24 بهمن 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 شهریور 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 02 مهر 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار