اثر تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده بر کیفیت سود و کیفیت افشا با تاکید بر نقش همبستگی درون صنعتی

سجادی, زانیار

doi:10.22099/jaa.2022.43516.2234

اثر تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده بر کیفیت سود و کیفیت افشا با تاکید بر نقش همبستگی درون صنعتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

زانیار سجادی

استادیار گروه حسابداری دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

10.22099/jaa.2022.43516.2234

چکیده

صورتهای مالی شرکتها یکی از اصلی‌ترین منابع اطلاعاتی تصمیم گیری برای سرمایه گذاران و سایر ذینفعان شرکتها می‌باشد؛ به همین دلیل شناسایی عوامل اثرگذار بر کیفیت صورتهای مالی شرکتها همواره مورد توجه پژوهشگران بوده است. هدف این پژوهش بررسی رابطه تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده با کیفیت سود و کیفیت افشا و همچنین بررسی نقش تعدیل گری همبستگی درون صنعتی بر این روابط است. برای محاسبه همبستگی درون صنعتی از مجموع کواریانس فروش جفتی تمام شرکتهای موجود در صنعت و برای محاسبه تنوع سبد سهامدار عمده از شاخص هرفیندال هیرشمن استفاده شده است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی بوده و نمونه آن شامل 153 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می باشد که به روش حذف سیستماتیک انتخاب شده اند. دوره زمانی پژوهش نیز شامل سالهای 1392 تا 1399 می باشد. نتایج نشان‌دهنده رابطه مثبت بین تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده شرکت و کیفیت سود و کیفیت افشا می باشد. اثر تعدیل گری همبستگی درون صنعتی بر رابطه بین تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده شرکت و کیفیت افشا منفی و معنادار بود، اما اثر آن بر رابطه بین تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده شرکت و کیفیت سود تایید نگردید. بنابراین همانطور که بر اساس مبانی نظری و ادبیات تحقیق انتظار می رفت، تنوع سبد سهامداران عمده و همبستگی درون صنعتی دو عامل اثرگذار بر کیفیت سود و کیفیت افشا در صورتهای مالی می باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20089988.1401.14.1.5.6

عنوان مقاله [English]

Large Shareholder Portfolio Diversification, Earnings and Disclosure Quality and Intra-Industry Connectedness

نویسنده [English]

Zanyar Sajjadi

Department of accounting, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Financial statements are among the most important sources of information for investors and other decision-makers. Hence, the evaluation of factors affecting financial reporting quality has gained great attention from researchers. Psychological and economic theories suggest that people have learning constraints, such that resources devoted toward one task reduce the resources available for other tasks (Kahneman, 1973; Peng, 2005; Peng and Xiong, 2006). Various studies provide empirical evidence that even professional market participants are subject to capacity constraints arising from limited time and attention (Chakrabarty and Moulton, 2012; Corwin and Coughenour, 2008; Harford et al., 2019; Schmidt, 2019). When shareholders spread their portfolio wealth among more firms, the weight of firms in the portfolio decrease, the benefit from gathering private information about a particular firm decreases, and shareholders considering resource constraints would have a great motivation to, instead of gathering private information acquisition through close interactions with management, use public disclosure as a cost-effective alternative information channel to reduce uncertainty about portfolio firms (Peng, 2005). Hence, shareholders would probably demand greater public information and there would be more pressure on the managers to increase the amount and quality of public financial disclosure. On the other hand, considering the intra-industry information transfer phenomenon, intra-industry connectedness can have a great impact on public information disclosure demand and manager behavior regarding financial information reporting (Sajjadi and Pourheydari, 2018). Hence there is a great probability that intra-industry connectedness moderates the relationship between large shareholder portfolio diversification and financial reporting quality. This study aims to evaluate the relation between large shareholder portfolio diversification, earnings quality, disclosure quality, and intra-industry connectedness.

Hypothesis
Based on the abovementioned theoretical foundations and evidence from previous works showing the effects of large shareholder portfolio diversification and intra-industry connectedness on managers' behavior and information demand satisfaction, the research hypotheses were formulated as follows:
H1: large shareholder portfolio diversification effects earnings quality.
H2: large shareholder portfolio diversification effects financial reporting quality.
H3: Intra-industry connectedness moderates the relationship between large shareholder portfolio diversification and earnings quality.
H4: Intra-industry connectedness moderates the relationship between large shareholder portfolio diversification and financial reporting quality.

Method
A sample including 153 firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) over the 2014 to 2021 period was used for hypothesis testing. An index was made based on Herfindahl–Hirschman index and was used as an indicator of large shareholder portfolio diversification. The absolute value of the covariance of change in sales across all firms in the same industry for each industry was calculated as the Intra-industry connectedness measurement. This covariance factor is calculated based on the decomposition of the aggregate volatility of sales, presented and used in prior studies (e.g., Comin and Philippon, 2005; Kim and Kwon, 2016; Pollack, 2013; Chiu, 2014). The measure of earnings quality is based on the Dechow and Dichev (2002) model. Following Francis et al. (2005) and Chiu (2014), the standard deviation of the firm’s residuals over the prior three years is used as a measure of earnings quality. Disclosure quality is measured based on scoring which has been published by the Tehran Security Exchange each year.

Results
Results show a positive association between large shareholder portfolio diversification, financial reporting quality, and earnings quality. The relationship between large shareholder portfolio diversification and financial reporting quality is negatively moderated by intra-industry connectedness, but there is no significant moderating effect of intra-industry connectedness in the relationship between large shareholder portfolio diversification and earnings quality.

Conclusion
Based on the results it can be said that large shareholder portfolio diversification and intra-industry connectedness have a significant impact on earnings and financial reporting quality and should be considered by investments and other decision-makers in risk assessment. Further research should be conducted to evaluate the impact of large shareholder portfolio diversification on other aspects of financial reporting.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Large Shareholder Portfolio Diversification
Earnings quality
Disclosure Quality
Intra-Industry Connectedness
Corporate Governance

مراجع

منابع

الف. فارسی

افلاطونی، عباس. (1397). اقتصادسنجی در پژوهش‌های مالی و حسابداری با نرم‌افزار EViews، ترمه.

بزرگ اصل، موسی و رضوی، سید مهدی. (1387). رابطه بین بازده سهام شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و برخی متغیرهای کلان اساسی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 6(22)، 97–117.

بهار مقدم، مهدی؛ جوکار، حسین و صالحی آسفیچی، نورالله. (1397). اثر تعدیل‌کنندگی نوع مالکیت نهایی شرکت‌ها بر رابطۀ بین سود سهام تقسیمی و کیفیت سود. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 10(2)، 63–100.

پورحیدری، امید و فروغی، عارف. (1398). بررسی تأثیر نفوذ مدیرعامل بر کیفیت افشای اطلاعات حسابداری. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 16(61)، 27–53.

خواجوی، شکراله؛ نصیری فر، هاشم و قدیریان آرانی، محمدحسین. (1400). ارتباطات سیاسی و کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری: شواهدی از تجدید ارائه صورت‌های مالی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 18(71)، 1–32.

دیدار، حمزه؛ منصورفر، غلامرضا و زارع، الهام. (1396). بررسی تأثیر کیفیت حاکمیت شرکتی بر کیفیت افشا با تأکید بر نقش تعدیل‌کنندۀ رقابت بازار محصول در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 9(1)، 97–118.

رحمانی، علی و بشیری منش، نازنین. (1392). بررسی قدرت کشف مدلهای مدیریت سود. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 5(19)، 54–73.

ستایش، محمد حسین و ابراهیمی میمند، مهدی. (1394). رابطه بین نوع مالکیت نهادی و کیفیت افشا در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 12(48)، 53–75.

سجادی، زانیار و پورحیدری، امید. (1396). بررسی رابطه همبستگی درون‌صنعتی با ضریب واکنش سود، دفعات پیش‌بینی سود و هزینه سرمایه. پژوهش‌های کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، 6(2)، 203–232.

سجادی، زانیار؛ پورحیدری، امید و خدامی پور، احمد. (1396). اثرات همبستگی درون‌صنعتی بر محیط گزارشگری مالی. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 9(2)، 35–62.

ظفری، سبحان؛ فروغی، داریوش و کیانی، غلامحسین. (1398). تأثیر قابلیت مقایسه و ثبات رویه حسابداری بر کیفیت سود : رویکرد متن کاوی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 16(64)، 1–30.

قربانی، سعید؛ موحد مجد، مرضیه و منفرد مهارلوئی، محمد. (1392). رقابت در بازار محصول، ترکیب هیأت‌مدیره و کیفیت افشای اطلاعات: شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 5(19)، 92–105.

ملکیان، اسفنیار و دریایی، عباسعلی. (1390). تبیین رابطه‌ی بین ویژگی‌های مالکیتی و شرکتی با ساختار حاکمیت شرکتی (شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران). پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 3(1)، 121–143.

نمازی، محمد و ابراهیمی، شهلا. (1391). بررسی ارتباط بین ساختار رقابتی بازار محصول و بازده سهام. دانش حسابداری مالی، 02(3)، 9-27.

یبلویی خمسلویی، مالک؛ ایزدی نیا، دکتر ناصر و عربصالحی، دکتر مهدی. (1397). تأثیر میزان شاخص‌های پایداری افشاء شده بر کیفیت سود. مجله دانش حسابداری، 9(1)، 7–34.

ب. انگلیسی

Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1987). Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 823-837.

Ajinkya, Bipin, Bhojraj, Sanjeev, & Sengupta, Partha. (2005). The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 343–376.

Akamah, Herita, & Shu, Sydney Qing. (2021). Large shareholder portfolio diversification and voluntary disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(4), 2918–2950.

Baharmoghaddam, M., Jokar, H., Salehi, N. (2020). The moderating effect of the type of firms’ ultimate ownership on the relationship between dividends and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Advances, 10(2), 63-100. (In Persian)

Baik, B., Kim, J. M., Kim, K., & Patro, S. (2020). Hedge fund ownership and voluntary disclosure. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54(3), 877-910.

Boone, Audra L., & White, Joshua T. (2015). The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 508–533.

Bozorg Asl, M., Razavi, S. (2008). The relationship between return of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchanges and some macro economic variables. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 6(22), 97-117. (In Persian)

Bratten, Brian, Payne, Jeff L., & Thomas, Wayne B. (2016). Earnings management: do firms play “follow the leader”? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 616–643.

Bushee, Brian J. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value?*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 207–246.

Bushee, B. J., Gerakos, J., & Lee, L. F. (2018). Corporate jets and private meetings with investors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(2-3), 358-379.

Bushee, B. J., & Goodman, T. H. (2007). Which institutional investors trade based on private information about earnings and returns?. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 289-321.

Bushee, B. J., Jung, M. J., & Miller, G. S. (2017). Do investors benefit from selective access to management?. Journal of Financial Reporting, 2(1), 31-61.

Bushee, B. J., Matsumoto, D. A., & Miller, G. S. (2003). Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-3), 149-180.

Bushee, B. J., & Noe, C. F. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171-171.

Chakrabarty, B., & Moulton, P. C. (2012). Earnings announcements and attention constraints: The role of market design. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 612-634.

Chen, X., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2007). Monitoring: which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 279-305.

Cheng, Q., Du, F., Wang, B. Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Do corporate site visits impact stock prices? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 359-388.

Chiu, C. W. (2014). Intra-industry connectedness and the corporate information environment. The University of Texas at Dallas.

Cohen, D. A. (2004). Quality of financial reporting choice: Determinants and economic consequences. Northwestern University.

Comin, Diego, & Philippon, Thomas. (2005). The rise in firm-level volatility: causes and consequences. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 11388.

Corwin, S. A., & Coughenour, J. F. (2008). Limited attention and the allocation of effort in securities trading. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 3031-3067.

Cox, Raymond A.K., Dayanandan, Ajit, & Donker, Han. (2016). The ricochet effect of bad news. International Journal of Accounting, 51(3), 385–401.

Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review, 77, 35-39.

Demski, Joel S., & Sappington, David. (1984). Optimal incentive contracts with multiple agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 33(1), 152–171.

Desir, Rosemond. (2012). How do managers of non-announcing firms respond to intra-industry information transfers? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(9–10), 1180–1213.

Didar, H. (2017). The impact of corporate governance quality on disclosure quality with emphasis on moderating role of product market competition in firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 9(1), 97-118. (In Persian)

Francis, Jennifer, LaFond, Ryan, Olsson, Per, & Schipper, Katherine. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.

Frankel, R., & Litov, L. (2009). Earnings persistence. Journal of accounting and economics, 47(1-2), 182-190.

Freeman, Robert, & Tse, Senyo. (1992). An earnings prediction approach to examining intercompany information transfers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(4), 509–523.

Fulkerson, J. A., & Riley, T. B. (2019). Portfolio concentration and mutual fund performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 51(C), 1-16.

Gaspar, J. M., Massa, M., & Matos, P. (2005). Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of financial economics, 76(1), 135-165.

Harford, J., Jiang, F., Wang, R., & Xie, F. (2019). Analyst career concerns, effort allocation, and firms’ information environment. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(6), 2179-2224.

Hermalin, Benjamin E, & Weisbach, Michael S. (2012). Information disclosure and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 195–233.

Inchausti, B. G. (1997). The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 6(1), 45-68.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jiang, F., Ma, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Multiple blockholders and earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64(C).

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063, pp. 218-226). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kedia, S., Koh, K., & Rajgopal, S. (2015). Evidence on contagion in earnings management. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2337-2373.

khajavi, S., Nasirifar, H., Ghadirian-Arani, M. (2021). Political connections and accounting information quality: evidence from financial restatement. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 18(71), 1-32. (In Persian)

Kim, D., Kim, H. D., Joe, D. Y., & Oh, J. Y. J. (2021). Institutional investor heterogeneity and market price dynamics: Evidence from investment horizon and portfolio concentration. Journal of Financial Markets, 54(C).

Kim, Y. G., & Kwon, H. U. (2017). Aggregate and firm-level volatility in the Japanese economy. The Japanese Economic Review, 68(2), 158-172.

Kirk, M. P., & Markov, S. (2016). Come on over: analyst/investor days as a disclosure medium. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1725-1750.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

Maffett, M. (2012). Financial reporting opacity and informed trading by international institutional investors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2-3), 201-220.

Namazi, M., & Ebrahimi, Sh. (2012). Investigating the relationship between product market’s competitive structure and stock return of the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2(3), 9-27. (In Persian)

Peng, L. (2005). Learning with information capacity constraints. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 307-329.

Peng, L., & Xiong, W. (2006). Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 563-602.

Pollack, J. R. (2013). Convergent trends in aggregate and firm volatility. UFR 02 Sciences Economiques.

Pourheidari, O., Forughi, A. (2019). Effect of management influence on disclosure quality of accounting information. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(61), 27-53. (In Persian)

Qu, Heng. (2019). Risk and diversification of nonprofit revenue portfolios: Applying modern portfolio theory to nonprofit revenue management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 193–212.

Rahmani, A., Bashirimanesh, N. (2013). Investigating of discovery power of earnings management models. Accounting and Auditing Research, 5(19), 54-73. (In Persian)

Rhoades, S. A. (1993). The Herfindahl-Hirschman index. Federal Reserve Bulletin, (Mar), 188-189.

Sajjadi, Z., pourhaidari, O. (2018). Intra-industry connectedness, earnings response coefficient, earnings forecasts quantity and cost of capital. Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 6(2), 203-232. (In Persian)

Sajjadi, Z., Pourhaidari, O., Khodamipour, A. (2017). Effects of intra-industry connectedness on corporate information environment. Journal of Accounting Advances, 9(2), 35-62. (In Persian)

Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. The American Economic Review, 80, 465-479.

Schmidt, D. (2019). Distracted institutional investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(6), 2453-2491.

Setayesh, M., Ebrahimi Maimand, M. (2015). Relationship between institutional ownership types and disclosure quality in Tehran Stock Exchange. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 12(48), 53-75. (In Persian)

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488.

Solomon, D., & Soltes, E. (2015). What are we meeting for? The consequences of private meetings with investors. The Journal of Law and Economics, 58(2), 325-355.

Tse, Senyo, & Tucker, Jennifer Wu. (2010). Within-industry timing of earnings warnings: Do managers herd? Review of Accounting Studies, 15(4), 879–914.

Xu, D. X. (2019). Costly information acquisition and investment decisions: Quasi-experimental evidence. Available at SSRN 3353987.

Yaballuei Khamesluei, M., Izadinia, N., Arabsalehi, M. (2018). Effects of disclosure of the extent of sustainability indicators on earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 9(1), 7-34. (In Persian)

Zafari, S., Foroughi, D., Kiani, G. (2019). The Impact of accounting comparability and consistency on earning quality: A text-mining approach. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(64), 1-30. (In Persian)