کارت ارزیابی متوازن و نقشه استراتژی برای مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار حسابداری ، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران ، قم ، ایران

2 دانشیار حسابداری ،دانشکده مدیریت ،دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران

3 دکتری حسابداری ،پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران ، قم ، ایران

چکیده

مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران با چالش هایی مانند رقابت حاد، توسعه نیافتگی و شدت فاصله انتظارها مواجه هستند. آنها برای اعتلاء و پایندگی خود ملزم به تأمین اهداف عملکردی چندگانه و پیچیده هستند و این امر، ضرورت انجام برنامه ریزی و ارزیابی عملکرد استراتژیک را آشکار می سازد. در این راستا، هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه یک کارت ارزیابی متوازن و نقشه استراتژی برای مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران است. پژوهش حاضر، کیفی و اکتشافی است که به روش تئوری داده بنیاد و طی سال های 1398 تا 1399 در محیط حرفه ای و دانشگاهی ایران انجام شده است. گردآوری داده پژوهش به صورت سه گانه (مثلثی) شامل 25 مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته، 38 مصاحبه ثانویه و تحلیل کیفی 548 سند از نشریه های حرفه ای ایران است. یافته های پژوهش نشان داد که یک کارت ارزیابی متوازن با پنج منظر شامل مالی، صاحب کار، فرآیندهای داخلی، یادگیری و رشد، و حسن شهرت، یک چارچوب جامع و هدفمند برای ارزیابی عملکرد استراتژیک مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران بدست می دهد. همچنین، نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که نقشه استراتژی حاصل از مدل کارت ارزیابی متوازن پژوهش، یک نقشه راه سیستماتیک و مؤثر برای پاسخ گویی به چالش ها و نیازهای اساسی مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران فراهم نموده و می تواند از رشد و اعتلای مؤسسه و حرفه حسابرسی در کشور صیانت و پشتیبانی نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map for Iranian Audit Firms

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammadreza Mehrabanpour 1
  • Gholamreza Karami 2
  • Mohammad Jandaghi Ghomi 3
1 Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of Tehran
2 Associate Prof. in Accounting, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran
3 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

 Introduction
The purpose of this study is to develop a balanced scorecard and strategy map for Iranian audit firms. Auditing firms not only face increasing challenges such as hyper-competition, underdevelopment, and severity of expectations gap, but also deal with multiple and complex performance goals that require strategic planning and performance evaluation. Therefore, the present article seeks to discover a balanced scorecard and strategy map as a comprehensive system of strategic planning and performance evaluation, so as to provide a roadmap for success and sustainability for Iranian audit firms.
 
 Questions
According to the stated purpose, the present study seeks to answer the following two questions:
Q1: How should the balanced scorecard of Iranian audit firms be?
Q2: How is the appropriate strategic plan for Iranian audit firms?
 
 Method
The present study is a qualitative and exploratory research in the professional and academic area of Iran during the period 2019-2020 that identifies the key success factors of auditing firms through a grounded theory and then structures them in the form of a comprehensive balanced scorecard and a coherent strategy map. The research evidence was collected by snowball sampling. In this regard, three sources have been used including 25 semi-structured interviews, 38 secondary interviews, and qualitative analysis of 548 articles, roundtables, and interviews published in professional journals. Also, in order to determine the sample size, the theoretical saturation rule has been followed.
 
 Results
The findings showed that a balanced scorecard with five perspectives including finance, clients, internal processes, learning and growth, and reputation, provides a comprehensive and purposeful framework for evaluating the strategic performance of Iranian auditing firms. Also, the audit firm's strategy map showed how good reputation is linked to learning and growth, and then to the internal, business, and financial processes, turning the organization's intangible assets into economic capital, and again economic capital leads to the empowerment and sustainable development of reputation, and learning and growth perspectives. Therefore, the strategy map outlines the cycle of continuous evolution and progress of an audit firm and supports and protects it.
 
In this regard, the most fundamental aspect of the balanced scorecard of an audit firm is the perspective of good reputation. The presence of reputable partners institutionalizes the commitment to the public interest in the firm. As a result, the firm puts professionalism at the forefront of its work in accepting and continuing to work with owners and only establishes working relationships with honest and transparent owners. Continuation of this practice has led to the formation of an outstanding quality background for the firm in the audit profession market and the profession observers, and this provides the grounds for attracting international cooperation for the organization. The result of the strategic efforts of the firm in the perspective of good reputation can be observed and evaluated, to a large extent,  as a summary indicator of the institute.
Categories of reputation form the basis of a learning and growth perspective in an audit firm. In other words, a reputable firm employs personnel with the highest training quality and up-to-date technologies. In addition, the reputable firm has a higher capacity to nurture and satisfy its employees. On the other hand, a reputed audit firm is consciously and purposefully interested in achieving a special quality level as well as expanding the diversity of its services by using prominent experts and consultants. The product of the categories of learning and growth is the organization's access to experienced personnel, who with their unique abilities can transform the internal processes of the organization.
The most fundamental effect of learning and growth in the audit firm is the institutionalization of a special level of professionalism in the process of doing work, which makes the services of the firm uniquely attractive to the clients and the supervisory bodies of the profession. Next, the process of doing work in the leading firm is carried out under the supervision of experienced personnel and experts, and this phenomenon not only brings high quality services but also high productivity. The result of these categories is that they protect the internal processes of the firm from the two main challenges of doing the work, namely time pressure and fee pressure, and as a result, the intellectual capital of the firm is yielded in the form of high-quality services.
Then the firm with the obtained high-quality services from the perspective of internal processes can take over the market of highly prestigious clients. If this goal is met, the audit firm will not only be recognized as an industry expert but will also provide the organization with the opportunity to offer a variety of services. Also, with the branding of the firm, more clients come to it and the firm's market share changes dramatically. Finally, the outcome of the firm's strategic efforts from the perspective of the balanced scorecard is summarized in the category of client profitability.
If the audit firm has succeeded in the perspective of the client, it is time to change the financial perspective of the balanced scorecard. First, auditing firms earn higher fees by achieving high-prestige, superior quality, and international-prestige ownership. Second, the reputable firm protects itself from the risk of deferred fees by attracting reputable clients. Third, the equipping of the audit firm with modern information technology, unique productivity, and economies of scale results in a significant reduction in the cost of services and a favorable profit margin for the organization. Finally, the firm's return on investment is a summary indicator of the financial success of the strategy.
 
 Discussion and Conclusion
The results showed that the strategy map obtained from the balanced scorecard model provides a systematic and effective roadmap to meet the challenges and basic needs of Iranian audit firms and it can protect and support the growth and development of the audit firm and profession of the country. 
 
Keywords: Audit Firms, Balanced Scorecard, Performance Evaluation, Strategy Map, Iranian Audit Profession.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Audit Firms
  • Balanced Scorecard
  • Performance Evaluation
  • Strategy Map
  • Iranian Audit Profession
منابع
الف. فارسی
امیری، اسماعیل و فخاری، حسین. (1399). شاخص ترکیبی برای خرید اظهارنظر حسابرس مبتنی بر فن تحلیل ممیزی. بررسی های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 27(1)، 1-31.
ثورن، لیندا. (1399). تدوین سنجه­های رفتاری برای سازه­های حسابداری. ترزا. لیبی، و لیندا. ثورن (تدوین کنندگان) در، پژوهش‌های حسابداری رفتاری (امید فرجی، محمد جندقی قمی، و فروزان فتاحی، مترجم، جلد 1، ص. 277-302). تهران: انتشارات بورس.
جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران. (1398، 06 2-4). ویدئوهای جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران. بازیابی در 06 2-4، 1398، از صفحه جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران در آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/video/video/listuser/username/iacpa/wrapper/true/%D9%87%D9%85%D9%87_%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%87%D8%A7
شورای عالی جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران. (1398). گزارش سالانه شورای عالی جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران برای سال مالی منتهی به 29 اسفند ماه 1397. تهران: جامعه حسابداران رسمی ایران.
محمدرضائی، فخرالدین و فرجی، امید. (1398). معمای سنجش کیفیت حسابرسی در پژوهش­های آرشیوی: نقد و ارائه پیشنهادهایی برای محیط پژوهشی ایران. بررسی­های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 26(1)، 87-122.
مهربان پور، محمدرضا؛ کرمی، غلامرضا و جندقی قمی، محمد. (1399). چارچوب سرمایه اجتماعی برای مؤسسات حسابرسی ایران. حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، 5(10)، 29-68.
مهربان پور، محمدرضا؛ کرمی، غلامرضا و جندقی قمی، محمد. (1400). تحلیل SWOT برای حرفه حسابرسی مستقل در ایران. بررسی­های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 28(2)، 359-397.
ب. انگلیسی
Almer, E. D., D. R. Philbrick, & K. H. Rupley. (2014). What drives auditor selection? Current Issues in Auditing, 8(1), A26–A42.
Amiri, E., & Fakhari, H. (2020). A composite index for audit opinion shopping based on discriminant analysis technique. Accounting and Auditing Review, 27(1), 1-31. (In Persian)
Askary, S., & M. Olynyk. (2006). Public interest, ethics, and the balanced scorecard: implications for the accouting profession. Australian Accouting Review, 16(1), 51-58.
Bakarich, K. M., & P. O'Brien. (2021). The robots are coming...But aren't here yet: The use of artificial intelligence technologies in the public accounting profession. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 18(1), 27-43.
Bergner, J., B. B. Marquardt, & P. Mohapatra. (2020). The auditor reputation cycle: A synthesis of the literature. International Journal of Auditing, 24(2), 292-319.
Campbell, D., S. Datar, S. L. Kulp, & V. G. Narayanan. (2015). Testing strategy with multiple performance measures evidence from a balanced scorecard at Store24. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(2), 39–65.
Christensen, B. E., Newton, N. J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.102225.
Christensen, L. B., R. B. Johnson, & L. A. Turner. (2015). Research Methods, Design, and Analysis (12 ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Coffee, J. C. (2019). Why do auditors fail? What might work? What won’t? Accounting and Business Research, 49(5), 540-561.
Dowling, C., & S. A. Leech. (2014). A Big 4 firm’s use of information technology to control the audit process: How an audit support system is changing auditor behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 230–252.
Duff, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 74-86.
Ettredge, M. L., S. Scholz, & C. Li. (2007). Audit fees and auditor dismissals in the Sarbanes-Oxley era. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 371-386.
Goddard, A. (2017). Grounded theory approach to accounting studies: overview of principles, assumptions and methods. In Z. Hoque, L. D. Parker, M. A. Covaleski, and K. Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods (pp. 91-111). New York.
Hegazy, M., Hegazy, K., & Eldeeb, M. (2020). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance evaluation in auditing firms. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, DOI: 10.1177/0148558X20962915.
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33-59.
Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. (2019, 08 24-26). The Videos of Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. Retrieved 08 24-26, 2019, from Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants: https://www.aparat.com/video/video/listuser/username/iacpa/wrapper/true/%D9%87%D9%85%D9%87_%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%87%D8%A7. (In Persian)
Kaplan, R. S., & D. P. Norton. (1996). The balanced score card: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the now business environment. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Lo, A. W., K. Z. Lin, & R. M. Wong. (2019). Does availability of audit partners affect audit quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, DOI: 10.1177/0148558X19893860.
Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced Scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 47-90.
Mehrabanpour, M., Karami, G., & Jandaghi Ghomi, M. (2021). Social capital framework for Iranian audit firms. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 5(10), 29-68. (In Persian)
Mehrabanpour, M., Karami, G., & Jandaghi Ghomi, M. (2021). SWOT analysis for the independent audit profession in Iran. Accounting and Auditing Review, 28(2), 359-397. (In Persian)
Mohammadrezaei, F., & Faraji, O. (2019). The dilemma of audit quality measuring in archival studies: critiques and suggestions for Iran’s research setting. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(1), 87-122. (In Persian)
Nehme, R. (2017). Performance evaluation of auditors: a constructive or a destructive tool of audit output. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 215 - 231.
Porter, B. (2014). The audit expectation gap: A persistent but changing phenomenon. In D. Hay, W. R. Knechel, & M. Willekens (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Auditing (pp. 43-53). New York: Routledge.
Stanley, J. D., D. M. Brandon, & J. J. McMillan. (2015). Does lowballing impair audit quality? Evidence from client accruals surrounding analyst forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 625-645.
Sundin, H., M. Granlund, & D. A. Brown. (2010). Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 203-246.
The Supreme Council of Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. (2019). Annual Report of the Supreme Council of the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants for the fiscal year ending March 20, 2019. Tehran: Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. (In Persian)
Thorne, L. (2020). The development of behavioural measures of accounting constructs. In T. Libby, & L. Thorne (Eds.), Behavioral Accounting Research (O. Faraji, M. Jandaghi Ghomi, & F. Fatahi, Trans., pp. 235-258). Tehran: Bourse. (In Persian)
Westermann, K. D., J. C. Bedard, & C. E. Earley. (2015). Learning the “craft” of auditing: a dynamic view of auditors’ on-the-job learning. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 864-896.