بررسی آثار پاسخ‌گویی سازمان‌های بخش عمومی بر رابطه بین کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و عملکرد آن‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حسابداری ،دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد ، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان ، زاهدان ، ایران

2 استادیار گروه حسابداری ،دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد،دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان،زاهدان،ایران

3 استادیار گروه حسابداری و مالی ، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری ، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

10.22099/jaa.2022.40470.2130

چکیده

دستیابی به عملکرد بهینه و مطلوب در تمامی زمینه‌ها از اهداف اصلی هر سازمانی است. بر این‌اساس، این مقاله با استفاده از نظریه مدیریت عمومی جدید و نظریه نمایندگی، به مطالعه نقش واسطه‌ای پاسخ‌گویی در رابطه بین کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و عملکرد سازمانی دستگاه‌های دولتی پرداخته است. آزمون الگو و فرضیه‌های پژوهش با استفاده از داده‌های مربوط به 209 پرسش‌نامه جمع‌آوری‌شده از حسابداران و مدیران دستگاه‌های دولتی استان سیستان و بلوچستان در سال 1399 انجام شد. نتایج الگوی نهایی پژوهش نشان داد که کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و پاسخ‌گویی دارای آثار مثبت و مستقیمی بر عملکرد سازمانی است. هم‌چنین، کیفیت گزارشگری مالی دارای آثار مثبت و مستقیمی بر پاسخ‌گویی دستگاه‌های دولتی است. افزون‌بر این، نتایج نشان‌دهنده آثار واسطه‌ای متغیر پاسخ‌گویی در رابطه بین کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و عملکرد است. این یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که دستگاه‌های دولتی برای بهبود عملکرد خود، باید بدنبال بهبود کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و سیستم‌های پاسخ‌گویی بهتر باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of the effect public sector organizations’ accountability in the relationship between financial reporting quality and their performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • gholamreza rezaei 1
  • Ramin Zeraatgari 2
  • Reza Taghizadeh 3
1 University of Sistan and Baluchestan
2 Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Accountability in the workplace is a well-researched organizational phenomenon that has been recognized as a fundamental component of successful organizations. In recent years, programs that try to increase transparency and accountability have been widely explored as tools to improve access to and quality of public services.  The public sector in developing countries (such as our country) is now demanding strong accountability for governmental agencies (Adhikari and Mellemvik, 2011). The delegation of responsibility and the demand for an accounting of the execution of that responsibility, establishes an accountability relationship between an actor (such as an employee) and a forum (such as a manager).
New public management and agency theory are relevant for understanding accountability mechanisms in public sector organizations. The new public management theory is a multi-dimensional concept (Hood, 1995). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s recommendations for financial transparency and increased efficiency in the public sector are in line with new public management theory (Arellano-Gault and Lepore, 2011). Agency theory has thereby become relevant to public-sector reform under the new public management framework (Boston, 2016). Accordingly, the new public management theory and agency theory are the basis of this paper.
Similar to other developing economies, Iran's economy faces problems such as low institutional capacity, lack of transparency, and high levels of corruption. In recent years, corruption in Iran has increased significantly compared to other countries (Rezaei et al., 1394). The aim of the present study is to rectify the preceding limitations. Actually, achieving optimal performance in all areas is one of the main goals of any organization. According to this, drawing on the new public management and agency theory, this paper examines the mediating role of accountability in the relationship between financial reporting quality and the performance of governmental agencies.
 
 Research Hypotheses
Based on the theoretical literature and the conducted studies, research hypotheses were developed as follows. The present study has four primary hypotheses.
First hypotheses: financial-reporting quality has a positive impact on governmental agencies’ performance.
Second hypotheses: financial-reporting quality has a positive impact on governmental agencies’ accountability.
Third hypotheses: governmental agencies’ accountability has a positive impact on their performance.
Fourth hypotheses: accountability has a mediating role on the relationship between financial reporting quality and governmental agencies’ performance.
 
 Methods
The statistical population of this research consists of all accountants and managers with a minimum of three years’ work experience in the governmental agencies in Sistan and Baluchestan province. The study used simple random sampling for its statistical population. In spite of the pursuit of the researchers via the HR department of the Sistan and Baluchestan governorate, the exact number of the accountants and managers was not found. However, the approximate number of accountants and managers in different governmental agencies was considered a large statistical population. Using Morgan’s table for large populations (from 100,000), the sample size consisted of 384 persons. After removing unsuitable questionnaires, totally 209 (54.4%) questionnaires were completed and used in this study.
In the present study, financial reporting quality was the independent variable. The questionnaire developed by Tran et al. (2021), as a prominent questioner, which consists of 13 questions was utilized. Also, to measure the performance of governmental agencies,   a questionnaire developed by the authors based on the face validity, consisting of 31 questions was used. In addition, a scale of 14 items developed by Mack and Ryan (2006) is used to measure accountability, comprising eight items of public accountability and six items of financial accountability. Finally, the environmental uncertainty is used as a control variable for measuring a questionnaire developed by Namazi and Rezaei (1396). Possible answers to questions in this study are categorized on a 5-point scale. Also, the collected data was calculated using Excel software and it was analyzed using SPSS-23 and AMOS-24.
 
Results
The result of research’s final model showed that at a confidence level of 95%, financial reporting quality and accountability has a positive and direct effect on the organizational performance. Also, the financial reporting quality has positive and direct effect on the accountability of governmental agencies. In addition, the results show the mediating effects of variable accountability on the relationship between financial reporting quality and performance.
 
 Discussion and Conclusion
The goal of this research is to study the effects of mediating role of accountability in the relationship between financial reporting quality and the performance of governmental agencies in Sistan and Baluchestan province. In general, based on the results of the present study and according to the significant effect of the financial reporting quality and accountability on the performance of governmental agencies, and since the main objective of financial reporting (a component of which is financial reporting), provides useful data to help actual and potential users (such as managers) in their logical decision making, disclosure of information, more quality will lead to the usefulness of decision making and  better accountability for users. These findings suggest that governmental agencies seeking to improve their performance need to improve financial reporting quality and accountability system.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • financial accountability
  • operational accountability
  • information quality
  • performance

مراجع

 منابع
الف. فارسی
باباجانی، جعفر. (1380). مسئولیت پاسخ­گویی و کنترل­های داخلی در بخش عمومی. حسابدار، 146، 22-27.
باباجانی، جعفر. (1390). حسابداری و کنترل­های مالی دولتی، چاپ هشتم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
پورحیدری، امید و اعظمی، زینب. (1389). شناسایی نوع اظهارنظر حسابرسان با استفاده از شبکه­های عصبی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 3، 77-97.
حبشی، نعمت. (1392). مطالعه روش­های حسابرسی دیوان محاسبات (مؤسسات عالی حسابرسی) دوازده کشور توسعه یافته و در حال توسعه در مقایسه با کشور جمهوری اسلامی ایران. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب.
حساس­یگانه، یحیی و خیرالهی، مرشد. (1387). حاکمّیت شرکتی و شفافیت. حسابدار، 203، 74-79.
حسینی عراقی، سیدحسین. (1391). حسابرسی دولتی، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علوم اقتصادی.
خواجوی، شکرالله، رضایی، غلامرضا و کشاورزمؤیدی، رقیه. (1398). اثربخشی حسابرسی مستقل در بخش عمومی به­عنوان حلقه­ی انتهایی پاسخگویی. خط­مشی­گذاری عمومی در مدیریت، 10(32)، 37-52.
رضایی، غلامرضا. (1392). بررسی اثرات بهبود کیفیت داده­های مالی بر هزینه­های نمایندگی شرکت­های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پایان­نامه کارشناسی­ارشد، دانشگاه شیراز.
رضایی، غلامرضا، کاظم­نژاد، مصطفی، زراعت­گری، رامین و بلوری، امین. (1394). ارزیابی نظام کنترل­های داخلی مؤسسات غیرانتفاعی بر اساس چارچوب کوزو: مطالعه موردی بیمارستان­های دولتی شیراز. حسابداری سلامت، 4(4)، 26-41.
سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار. (1386). کیفیت افشا و اطلاع­رسانی مناسب، سایت بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.
کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابداری دولتی. (1395). استانداردهای حسابداری بخش عمومی، تهران: انتشارات سازمان حسابرسی.
محمودآبادی، حمید، رضایی، غلامرضا و گرگانی فیروزجاه، ابوالفضل. (1392). بررسی آثار سرمایه فکری در بهبود کیفیت گزارشگری مالی شرکت­های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پیشرفت­های حسابداری، 5(2)، 75-99.
نمازی، محمد. (1382). تکامل ارزیابی متوازن. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی دانشگاه مازندران، 3(8)، 162-189.
نمازی، محمد و رضایی، غلامرضا. (1396). مدل­بندی نقش واسطه­ای سیستم اطلاعات حسابداری مدیریت، انگیزش و تعهد سازمانی در برنامه­ریزی راهبردی و ایجاد مازاد بودجه­ای مدیران خدمات درمانی. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 6(24)، 113-133.
نمازی، محمد، رضایی، غلامرضا و ممتازیان، علیرضا. (1393). رقابت در بازار محصول و کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 6(2)، 131-166.
نمازی، محمد و رمضانی، امیررضا. (1382). ارزیابی متوازن در حسابداری مدیریت. مجله علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز، 19(2)، 2-20.
ب. انگلیسی
Adhikari, P., & Mellemvik, F. (2011). The rise and fall of accruals: a case of Nepalese central government. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economics, 1(2), 123-143.
An, Y. H. (2009). The effect of corporate governance on earnings quality: Evidence from Korea’s corporate governance reform. Ph.D Dessertation, RMIT University.
Andrews, R. (2008). Perceived environmental uncertainty in public organizations: An empirical exploration. Public Performance and Management Review, 32(1), 21-46.
Arellano-Gault, D. & Lepore, W. (2011). Transparency reforms in the public sector: Beyond the new economics of organization. Organization Studies, 32(8), 1029-1050.
Babajani, J. (2001). Responsibility for accountability and internal controls in the public sector. Accountant, 146, 22-27. (In Persian)
Babajani, J. (2011). Government accounting and financial controls. 8th Edition, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press. (In Persian)
Boston, J. (2016). Basic NPM ideas and their development, The Ashgate research companion to new public management. Routledge, 33-48.
Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2014). Performance and accountability—A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207-225.
Cohen, S. & Karatzimas, S. (2017). Accounting information quality and decision-usefulness of governmental financial reporting: Moving from cash to modified cash. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(1), 95-113.
Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376-417.
Felício, T., Samagaio, A. & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 593-602.
Government Accounting Standards Development Committee. (2007). Public Sector Accounting Standards, Tehran: Audit Organization Publications. (In Persian)
Grigoroudis, E., Orfanoudaki, E. & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega, 40(1), 104-119.
Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector–rhetoric or reality. Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 1-19.
Habashi, N. (2013). Study of auditing methods of the Audit Court (Higher Auditing Institutions) of twelve developed and developing countries in comparison with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch. (In Persian)
Han, Y. (2019). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: performance-accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6), 927-948.
Hasasyeganeh, Y., & Kheirollahi, M. (2009). Corporate governance and transparency. Accountant, 203, 74-79. (In Persian)
Hassan, M.S., Saleh, N.M. &. Abd Rahman, M.R.C. (2008). Determinants of financial instruments disclosure quality among listed firms in Malaysia. Working paper, Available at SSRN: www.ssrn.com.
Hayduk, L.A. & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(159), 1-17.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
Hepworth, N. (2017). Is implementing the IPSASs an appropriate reform? Public Money & Management, 37(2), 141-148.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Hood, C. (1995). The ‘‘New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organization, & Society, 20(2–3), 93-109.
Hosseini Iraqi, H. (2012). Government Audit, 1th Edition, Tehran: University of Economic Sciences Publications. (In Persian)
Jung, T., Scott, T., Davies, H.T., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R. & Mannion, R. (2009). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1087-1096.
Kalimullah, N.A., Alam, K.M.A. & Nour, M.A. (2012). New public management: Emergence and principles. BUP Journal, 1(1), 1-22.
Khajavi, S., Rezaee, G., & kasavarz moyadee, R. (2019). Effectiveness of independent auditing in public sector as the latest of accountability loop. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 1(3), 77-97. (In Persian)
Kim, P.S. (2009). Enhancing public accountability for developing countries: Major constraints and strategies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(s1), S89-S100.
Kobayashi, M., Yamamoto, K. & Ishikawa, K. (2016). The usefulness of accrual information in non-mandatory environments: The case of Japanese local government. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 153-161.
Krambia-Kapardis, M., Clark, C. & Zopiatis, A. (2016). Satisfaction gap in public sector financial reporting. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economics, 6(3), 232-253.
Kroll, A. (2015). Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: A planned-behavior approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), 201-215.
Mack, J. & Ryan, C. (2006). Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general-purpose financial reports of Australian government departments. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 592-612.
Mahmoodabadi, H., Rezaee, G., & Gorgani Firozjah, A. (2014). Examining the Impact of Intellectual Capital on Improving Financial Reporting Quality of the Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting Advances, 5(2), 75-99. (In Persian)
Martin, J. & Spano, A. (2015). From performance management to strategic local government leadership: lessons from different cultural settings. Public Money & Management, 35(4), 303-310.
Mbelwa, L., Adhikari, P. & Shahadat, K. (2019). Investigation of the institutional and decision-usefulness factors in the implementation of accrual accounting reforms in the public sector of Tanzania. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economics, 9(3), 335-365.
Mizrahi, S., Minchuk, Y. (2019). Accountability and performance management: Citizens’ willingness to monitor public officials. Public Management Review, 21(3), 334-353.
Mnif Sellami, Y. & Gafsi, Y. (2019). Institutional and economic factors affecting the adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 119-131.
Nakmahachalasint, O. & Narktabtee, K. (2019). Implementation of accrual accounting in Thailand’s central government. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 139-147.
Namazi, M. (2004). The evolution of balanced scorecard. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mazandaran University, 3(8), 162-189. (In Persian)
Namazi, M., & Ramazani, A. (2004). The balanced scorecard in management accounting. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University, 2(19), 2-20. (In Persian)
Namazi, M., & Rezaee, G. (2018). Modeling Mediating Role of Management Accounting Information System, Motivation, and Organizational Commitment in Strategic Planning and Health Service Managers’ Creation of the Budgetary Slack. Accounting knowledge and Management Audit, 6(24), 113-133. (In Persian)
Namazi, M., Rezaee, G., & Momtazian, A. (2015). Product Market Competition and Accounting Information Quality. Journal of Accounting Advances, 6(2), 131-166. (In Persian)
Nirwana, N. & Haliah, H. (2018). Determinant factor of the quality of financial statements and performance of the government by adding contextual factors: Personal factor, system/administrative factor. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 28-40.
Patton, J.M. (1992). Accountability and governmental financial reporting. Financial Accountability & Management, 8(3), 165-180.
Pourheydari, O., & Azami, Z. (2011). Predicting auditor’s opinions: A neural networks approach. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 1(3), 77-97. (In Persian)
Pownall, G., & Schipper, K. (1999). Implications of accounting research for the SEC's consideration of International Accounting Standards for US securities offerings. Accounting Horizons, 13(3), 259-280.
Rajib, S.U., Adhikari, P., Hoque, M. & Akter, M. (2019). Institutionalisation of the cash basis International Public Sector Accounting Standard in the central government of Bangladesh: An example of delay and resistance. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economics, 9(1), 28-50.
Reck, J.L. (2001). The usefulness of financial and nonfinancial performance information in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 20(1), 45-71.
Rezaee, G. (2013). Investigating the effects of improving the quality of financial data on the agency costs of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Master Thesis, Shiraz University. (In Persian)
Rezaee, G., Kazemnezhad, M., Zeraatgari, R., & Bolouri, A. (2016). Evaluating the Internal Controls System in Non-profit Institutions Based on COSO Framework (A Case Study: Shiraz Public Hospitals). Journal of Health Accounting, 4(4), 26-41. (In Persian)
Securities and Exchange Organization. (2008). Disclosure quality and appropriate information, Tehran Stock Exchange site. (In Persian)
Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the annual report an accountability medium? An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 327-350.
Thoms, P., Dose, J.J. & Scott, K.S. (2002). Relationships between accountability, job satisfaction, and trust. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(3), 307-323.
Tran, T.B. (2014). The cycle of transparency, accountability, corruption, and administrative performance: evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 16(3), 32-48.
Tran, Y.T., Nguyen, N.P. & Hoang, T.C. (2021). The role of accountability in determining the relationship between financial reporting quality and the performance of public organizations: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1), 89-95.
Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index. Available at: https://www.transpar ency.org/country/#IRN. [Online] [10 December 2016]
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London/New York: Routledge.
Van Helden, G.J. & Reichard, C. (2013). A meta-review of public sector performance management research. Tékhne, 11(1), 10-20.
Veladar, B., Bašic´, M. & Kapic´, J. (2014). Performance measurement in public sector of transition countries. Business Systems Research, 5(2), 72-83.
Verbeeten, F.H. & Speklé, R.F. (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: Empirical evidence on new public management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953-978.
Wachtel, T.L., Hartford, C.E. & Hughes, J.A. (1999). Building a balanced scorecard for a burn center. Burns, 25, 431-37.
 
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 13 دی 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 دی 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار