بررسی نگرش دانشگاهیان و حسابداران دانشگاه ها نسبت به وضعیت حسابداری دولتی در دانشگاه های ایران (مطالعه‌ی موردی: دانشگاه های شیراز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار بخش حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز

2 کارشناس ارشد بخش حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف این مقاله، بررسی نگرش دانشگاهیان و حسابداران دانشگاه­ها، نسبت به وضعیت حسابداری دولتی در دانشگاه­های ایران است. این مطالعه، از نوع پیمایشی-کاربردی است. جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، از طریق ارسال پرسش­نامه به دو گروه دانشگاهیان و افراد شاغل در امور مالی دانشگاه­های شیراز در سال 1389 انجام شده است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها، از روش‌های آماری T-student وANOVA  استفاده شده است. پژوهش در قالب 6 فرضیه، انجام شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که نگرش دانشگاهیان و حسابداران، در فرضیه­های اول و سوم، با هم تفاوت معناداری ندارد؛ اما در فرضیه­های دوم، چهارم و پنجم تفاوت معناداری دارد. افزون بر این، بین نگرش 3 گروه دانشگاهیان، حسابداران دانشگاه شیراز و حسابداران دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز در خصوص فرضیه­های اول تا پنجم، اختلاف معناداری وجود ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Extended Abstract An Investigation of the University Affiliated and Practical University Accountants' View Points Towards the Status of the Public Sector Accounting in Iran’s Universities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamhossein Mahdavi 1
  • Navid reza Namazi 2
چکیده [English]

Journal of Accounting Advances (J.A.A)
Vol. 4, No. 4, Spring & Summer, 2012, Ser. 62/3
 
 
Extended Abstract
 
An Investigation of the University Affiliated and Practical University Accountants' View Points Towards the Status of the Public Sector Accounting in Iran’s Universities
(Case Study: Shiraz Universities)
 
Dr. G. H. Mahdavi                                 N. R. Namazi
Shiraz University
 
Introduction
According to the preface to the Iranian Accounting Standards, the range of the application of the accounting standards is related to the preparation of the financial standards with the public aim of providing useful information about the financial situation, financial performance and flexibility of the business units for various decision makers (Iranian Accounting Standards, 2010: 5)
The purpose of this study is t find an answer for the question: Whether there is a significant difference between the points of view of the university academics and practitioners with respect to public promulgation of accounting standards of the universities.
 
Research Method
This Research is a survey study. The population of the study consists of 40 professors, M.A. and Ph.D. students of accounting at Shiraz University, 30 top financial managers of Shiraz University and 35 top financial managers of Shiraz Medical Sciences University. The information was obtained via a questioner. The validity of the questioner was tested with the "face validity" approach; its reliability was tested based upon the "Cronbach's Alpha". The reported Cronbach's Alpha was 90.2; thus, the questioner was a suitable means for gathering information. T-Test and ANOVA were employed as relevant statistical tools and they were processed with SPPSS-16 and Excel 2007.
 
Research Hypotheses
Given the objective of this study, the following hypotheses were developed:

There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners with respect to the implementation of the public sector accounting standards of the universities.
There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners with respect to the suitability of the accounting reporting in the universities.
There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners with respect to the suitability of the responsibility function.
There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners with respect to the improvements of the decision making models of public sector accounting.
There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners with respect to the promulgation of the auditing standards for the universities.
There is a significant difference between the viewpoints of the accounting academics and practitioners of the Shiraz University and the practitioners of the Shiraz Medical Science University with respect to the implementation of the public sector accounting standards, suitability of the accounting reporting, suitability of the responsibility function, improvements of the decision making models of public sector accounting, promulgation of the auditing standards.

 
Findings
The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference between the viewpoints of accounting academics and practitioners, for the first and third hypothesis.
However, for the second, fourth and fifth hypothesis, the differences between viewpoints was significant. Also, there was no significant difference between the viewpoints of accounting academics and practitioners of the Shiraz University and the practitioners of the Shiraz Medical Science University for the sixth hypothesis.   
 
Conclusion
Accounting academics and practitioners of Shiraz University as well as practitioners of Shiraz Medical Sciences University demand that special accounting and auditing standards be promulgated. Hence, it is suggested that Audit Organization of Iran should attempt to establish relevant public sector accounting and auditing standards. In addition, future accounting researchers could utilize the international accounting and auditing standards in order to recommend relevant public sector accounting and auditing standards for the universities.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Iranian Accounting Standards
  • Iranian Universities Accounting Standards