شناسایی زمینه‌های پیاده‌سازی حاکمیت بشردوستانه براساس تحلیل تماتیک و الگوی بازنمایی سیستمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید چمران، اهواز، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحد آبادان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران

10.22099/jaa.2023.47634.2352

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه ارائه چارچوب ساختار حاکمیت بشردوستانه و بازنمایی سیستمی کارکردهای آن در شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه می‌باشد. این مطالعه از نظر روش شناسی اکتشافی و به لحاظ تحلیلی ترکیبی قلمداد می‌شود. زیرا بدلیل فقدان چارچوب منسجم در خصوص ساختار حاکمیت بشردوستانه، این مطالعه از طریق تحلیل تماتیک نسبت به شناسایی مضامین مطالعه از طریق مصاحبه و کدگذاری اقدام نمود. سپس با استفاده از تحلیل دلفی فازی، پایایی ابعاد شناسایی شده مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت تا در نهایت در بخش کمی، جهت تبیین مضامین سازمان دهنده‌ی شناسایی شده در بستر کارکردهای شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه از تحلیل بازنمایی سیستمی بهره برده شد. در این مطالعه باتوجه به نقطه اشباع تئوریک در تحلیل تماتیک، 12 نفر از خبرگان حسابداری مشارکت داشتند و در بخش کمی نیز 24 نفر از اعضای هیئت مدیره دارای بیش از سه سال سابقه حرفه‌ای که تجربه و دانش تخصصی لازم را داشتند، اقدام به مشارکت نمودند. نتایج مطالعه در بخش کیفی طی 12 مصاحبه انجام شده از وجود ۳ مضمون فراگیر و 6 مضمون سازمان دهنده و 36 مضمون پایه حکایت دارد. از طرف دیگر نتایج بازنمایی سیستمی به عنوان تحلیل بخش کمی نشان داد، ساختار حاکمیت شبکه‌گرایانه در حاکمیت بشردوستانه محرک‌آمیزترین تغییر ساختاری شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه برای ارتقاء سطح مشروعیت و اعتماد اجتماعی تلقی می‌شود که می‌تواند دو پیامد حاکمیت جمع‌سالارانه و حاکمیت شایسته‌سالارانه به عنوان ساختار حاکمیت بشردوستانه را در پی داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of implementation areas the Philanthropy Governance Structure and the Systematic Representation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Ab Shirini 1
  • Vali Khodadadi 2
  • Saeed Nasiri 3
  • Nader Khedri 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction

One of the most important changes in corporate governance, especially in the era of commercial competition at the market level, is the move towards governance altruism or philanthropy as a part of social responsibility, which can lead to greater stability in the credibility of companies (Chih, 2023). Companies, by changing their governance structure from the classical management style to philanthropy, actually seek the voluntary and unconditional transfer of cash or other resources for public purposes; maintaining the quality of interaction with stakeholders,reducing capital restrictions and most importantly, improving legitimacy (Boesso and Cerbioni, 2018). In fact, philanthropic governance through the perception, based on the observance of the rights of stakeholders, which includes a range of groups related to the company, seeks to protect the interests of others in addition to one's own interests in a competitive market to reduce agency costs by reducing opportunistic behaviors (Tshabalala, 2021). In other words, this approach in today's competitive era will reduce mismanagement behaviors and the company will draw more stable perspectives of more effective dealings with stakeholders at the market level. But the problem that exists is that for any change in the way of governance of companies, it is necessary to change the structure of its administration in order to strengthen the possibility of expanding effective supervision over the functional functions of companies (Sahri and Pourzmani, 1401).
 

Research Questions

According to the given explanations, the following questions are presented to carry out the analysis processes:

The first research question: What are the fields of philanthropic governance of capital market companies?
The second research question: What are the drivers and consequences of the underlying propositions of humanitarian governance of capital market companies?

The method of formulating the research questions shows that the first question is based on the analysis of the qualitative part and the second question is based on the analysis of the quantitative part in this study.
 

Methods

The nature of the methodology of this study is considered development in terms of the result, because no study in the past has attempted to provide a framework based on identifying the areas of philanthropic governance of capital market companies, conducting this study can contribute to the conceptual integrity of the phenomenon under investigation. Also, this study, accordant with the goal, is included in the category of exploratory studies based on interviews with experts and three-stage coding to determine the basic themes; Organizer and comprehensive in line with the expansion of humanitarian governance structure at the level of capital market companies. Finally, from the point of view of the nature of data collection, it should be stated that this study is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. The philosophy of the present study is considered to be based on the intersection of voluntarism in the philosophy of the world with structuralism in the philosophy of science. In fact, for this reason, the present study is an inductive study that examines the phenomenon that there is no comprehensive framework regarding the nature of the structure of humanitarian governance at the level of capital market companies, and this study tries to strengthen and develop theoretical coherence in this field. On the other hand, this study is comparative, because through a systematic process, it seeks to determine the drivers and consequences of the identified dimensions of the humanitarian governance structure in the context of the real functions of the capital market.
 

Results

According to the inductive/comparative nature of the present study, firstly, in the qualitative part, through thematic analysis, the main themes of humanitarian governance are determined, and then the reliability of the identified dimensions is examined through the fuzzy Delphi analysis, and then based on the analysis of the linkage matrix. It is done to identify the drivers and consequences of the theoretical framework in the context of the functions of capital market companies. Therefore, in the first step, thematic analysis was used to determine the themes related to the structure of humanitarian governance Thematic analysis is considered as the executive process of content analysis, which analyzes the basics and concepts of the current topic through simultaneous content analysis in similar studies and conducting interviews to determine its dimensions. Therefore, during 12 interviews, 3 overarching themes, 6 organizing themes and 36 conceptual basic themes were identified in the form of a six-dimensional framework.
 

Discussion and Conclusion

The purpose of this study is to identify the fields of humanitarian governance and the systematic representation of its functions in capital market companies. In this study, due to the lack of a coherent combination of structural fields that can be extended to the capital market companies in past studies, an attempt was made to identify the dimensions of this field through theme analysis. Therefore, during the processes of this analysis, there are a total of three overarching themes; Six organizing themes and thirty-six basic themes were identified from the 12 conducted interviews. In the following, with the aim of measuring the reliability of the themes of the identified organizer, to explain it in the context of the functions of capital market companies, fuzzy Delphi analysis was used and based on the evaluation of the average of the first and second phases of Delphi, all dimensions were determined because the difference was less than 2. 0, were confirmed, and in this way it was possible to measure it through system representation analysis. Further, based on the second research question, an attempt was made to determine the consequences and underlying drivers of the development of philanthropic governance in the context of the functions of capital market companies. Therefore, through the analysis of the matrix of linked relations and specifying the input and output of the humanitarian governance structure, a system representation diagram was drawn so that the necessary discussion and reasoning in this field can be based on it. As the result of the system representation showed, a structure based on network orientation is considered the most stimulating axis of the philanthropic corporate governance structure at the level of capital market companies, which can be effective in advancing the goals of the corporate citizen.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Philanthropy Governance
  • Thematic Process
  • Systematic Representation
الف. فارسی
اشرفی، مجید، عباسی، ابراهیم. (1401). رفتار بشردوستانه شرکت و کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری، تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 14(55)، 55-76.
پیروزمند، علیرضا، خورشیدی، محمد. (۱۳۹۸). مولفه‏‌های ساختاری بشردوستی سازی اسلامی (با رویکرد آینده پژوهی)، نشریه مطالعات بنیادین بشردوستی نوین اسلامی، ۲(۱)، ۳۲۹-۳۵۸.
تقی‌زاده خانقاه، وحید، بادآور نهندی، یونس، متقی، علی‌اصغر، تقی‌زاده، هوشنگ. (1398). ارتباط بین بشردوستی شرکتی و کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری با تاکید بر مالکیت سرمایه‌گذاران نهادی، حسابداری مدیریت، 12(43)، 1-16.
جلالی، رستم. (۱۳۹۱). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی. مجله تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت، ۱(۴)، ۳۱۰-۳۲۰.
خدامی، سهیلا، گلپایگانی، احمد. (1399). رابطه میان کدهای اخلاقی و عملکرد پایدار سازمانی: با تاکید بر نقش بشردوستی. اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، ۱۵(۴)، ۶۱-۵۴
صادق، محمدهادی، پرچمی‌سرقین، مریم، تاج‌الدینی، محمدحسین. (1402). نقش حاکمیت شرکتی بر موفقیت سرمایه‌گذاری‌های مشترک بین‌المللی، فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 14(54)، 61-80.
محمدی، سجاد، صالحی، اله‌کرم، کوه‌بر، محمدامین. (1401). طراحی مدل سبک‌های شناختی حسابرسان و ارزیابی محورهای شناسایی شده در حرفه حسابرسی، پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 14(2): 21-41.
رنجبر، هادی، حق‌دوست، علی‌اکبر، صلصالی، مهوش، خوشدل، علیرضا، سلیمانی، محمدعلی، بهرامی، نسیم. (1391). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی: راهنمایی برای شروع، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران، 3(10)، 238-250.
زرین‌نگار، محمدجعفر، فانی، علی‌اصغر، دانایی‌فرد، حسن، دلخواه، جلیل. (1397). واکاوی و تبیین بشردوستی سازمانی در سازمان‌های دولتی ایران، مدیریت دولتی، 10(1)، 89-108
سحری، محمدرضا، پورزمانی، زهرا. (1401). تبیین الگوی ویژگی‌های حاکمیت شرکتی با محوریت حسابداری مدیریت استراتژیک و حسابداری مدیریت، پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 14(55)، 121-144.
شفیع‌زاده، بهاره، حسینی، سیدعلی، رحمانی، علی، سلطانی، محمد. (1397). نقش گزارشگری مالی، شفافیت و راهبری شرکتی در حمایت از حقوق سرمایه‌گذاران، فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 11(42)، 74-95.
مدهوش، محمود، صفری‌گرایلی، مهدی، رمضانی، جواد، بابایی‌خلیلی، جواد، خلیل‌پور، مهدی. (1401). آینده پژوهی حسابداری حقوق بشر: رویکرد تحلیل سناریو، پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 14(2)، 78-99.
ب. انگلیسی
Abebe, M. and Cha, W. (2018). The effect of firm strategic orientation on corporate philanthropic engagement, Management Decision, 56(3), 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2016-0625
AL-Abrrow, H., Abdullah, H. and Atshan, N. (2019). Effect of organizational integrity and leadership behavior on organizational excellence: Mediator role of work engagement, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(4), 972-985. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1518
Ananzeh, H., Al Amosh, H. and Albitar, K. (2022). The effect of corporate governance quality and its mechanisms on firm philanthropic donations: evidence from the UK, International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(4), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-12-2021-0248
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research, Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Boesso, G. and Cerbioni, F. (2018). Strategic Philanthropy in Foundations: The Board Members’ Perspective, Hybridity in the Governance and Delivery of Public Services (Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance, Vol. 7), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020180000007006
Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Journals of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101
Cha, W., Rew, D. and Jung, J. (2023). Corporate philanthropy and firm performance: the role of corporate strategies, Society and Business Review, 18(1), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2021-0249
Chai, K.-C., Xie, D.-C., Yeh, C.-P., Lan, H.-R., and Cui, Z.-X. (2022). Chinese National Civilized City and Corporate Social Responsibility: Will Civilized City Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? Appl. Econ. Lett, 29(7), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1877250
Chih, C. (2023). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on participating in philanthropic road-running events: a moderated mediation model, Sport, Business and Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-05-2022-0038
Chizema, A., Pogrebna, G. (2019). The impact of government integrity and culture on corporate leadership practices: Evidence from the field and the laboratory, The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.07.001
Eikenberry, A, M. (2006). Philanthropy and governance, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(4), 586-592.
Grine, F., Bensaid, B. and Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff, M.Y. (2013). Islamic art and the ethos of spirituality within a civilizational context, Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 7(4), 288-300.
Harris, D, L., Twomey, T, M. (2020). Economic Democracy: The Role of Privilege in Advancing Civilization, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(5), 1229-1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12304
Ilyas, S., Abid, G. and Ashfaq, F. (2023). Enhancing the perceived organizational support, perceived ethical-philanthropic CSR and subjective well-being: the role of ethical leadership, International Journal of Ethics and Systems, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-04-2022-0084
Jonsen, K. and Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2): 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
Kaur, J. & Sharma, S. (2014). Developing collaborative organizational culture, ethical workplace climate to enhance employee engagement: An empirical study of retail sector, in changing face of modern retail: the new economic order. Proceedings of international conference on management, Gurgaon, Excel India Publishers, New Delhi.
Lawshe, CH. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psych, 28(3): 563-75.
Nakamaki, H., Hioki, K., Mitsui, I., Takeuchi, Y. (2018). Enterprise as an instrument of civilization, an anthropological approach to business administration, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54916-1
Neralla, N. (2022). Can corporate governance structure effect on corporate performance: an empirical investigation from Indian companies? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance,
Qi, Zh., Zhang, E., Wang, Ch., Liu, W. (2022). The power of civilization: the role of civilized cities in corporate ESG performance, Environmental Economics and Management, 12(3), 1-33.
Simons, A., Wohlgenannt, I., Weinmann, M., Fleischer, S. (2020). Good gamers, good managers? A proof-of-concept study with Sid Meier’s Civilization, Review of Managerial Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00378-0
Tshabalala, S. (2021). The Governance of corporate philanthropy, Huruma Bantfu, 2(2), 166-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3920012
Verger, A., Lubienski, C., Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). Philanthropic governance: charitable companies, the commercialization of education      and that thing called ‘democracy’, World Yearbook of Education: The Global Education Industry. New York: Routledge.
Wan, P., Chen, X., Ke, Y. (2020). Does corporate integrity culture matter to corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 259(20), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120877
Wastell, D. G. (2001). Barriers to effective knowledge management: Action research meets grounded theory. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 5(2), 21–35
Wendry, B., Nimran, U., Utami, H.N., Afrianty, T, W. (2022). The role of good corporate governance in mediating the effect of planning, coordination, supervision, and organizational culture on firm performance and firm sustainability, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02125-9
Yu, H.-C. (2020). Corporate philanthropic giving and sustainable development, Journal of Management Development, 39(7/8), 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2019-0479
Zou, H., Liang, Z., Qi, G. and Ma, H. (2022). Corporate philanthropic response to the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a dilemma?, Social Responsibility Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2021-0432