بررسی مدیریت سود برای جلوگیری از گزارش زیان و کاهش سود و کاربرد نظریه‌ی چشم‌انداز برای تشریح انگیزه‌های آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

چکیده

 
چکیده
در سالیان اخیر با توجه به مشکلات استفاده از اقلام تعهدی برای بررسی مدیریت سود برخی نویسندگان رویکرد توزیع سود خالص1 را برای بررسی مدیریت سود مطرح کرده‌اند. در این رویکرد با بررسی توزیع فراوانی سود گزارش‌شده حول یک آستانه‌ی2 مشخص، هرگونه الگوی غیرعادی دلالت بر مدیریت سود خواهد داشت. در پژوهش حاضر از این رویکرد در بررسی مدیریت سود برای جلوگیری از گزارش زیان و جلوگیری از کاهش سود در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران و در دوره‌ی زمانی 5 ساله 1392-1388 استفاده شده است. هم­چنین کاربرد نظریه‌ی چشم‌‌انداز3 برای تشریح انگیزه‌های این نوع مدیریت سود نیز بررسی شد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از این است که مدیریت سود برای جلوگیری از گزارش زیان در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران وجود دارد. با این‌حال شواهدی مؤید مدیریت سود برای جلوگیری از کاهش سود به‌دست نیامد. هم­چنین شواهد به‌دست‌آمده نشان داد که می‌توان از نظریه‌ی چشم‌انداز به‌منظور تشریح دلایل مدیریت سود برای جلوگیری از گزارش زیان استفاده کرد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An investigation of earnings management to avoid losses and earnings decreases and the implementation of Prospects Theory to explain its motives

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamhossein Mahdavi
  • Abbas Rezalouei
چکیده [English]

 
Introduction
       Accounting earnings are viewed as the premier information item provided in financial statements. Earnings are widely used as a key performance indicator of business success. Failure to meet or beat market expectations results in adverse consequences for the firm. Managers are, therefore, concerned about reporting an earnings number that meets or exceeds market expectations. Three research designs were commonly used in the earnings management literature: those based on aggregate accruals, those based on specific accruals and those based on the distribution of earnings (McNichols, 2000). As Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) suggest the earnings distribution approach investigates the statistical feature of earnings distribution to discover any abnormal patterns. These studies consider the behavior of earnings around a specific threshold to examine whether or not the frequency distribution of earnings above or below the threshold is smooth. In this paper, we use earnings distribution approach (EDA) to investigate whether firms manage reported earnings. This paper has focused on two earnings targets, namely (1) reporting profits, or ‘positive earnings’, (2) reporting results that improve upon last year’s performance. Our next question is related to the incentives of firms to manage earnings. We examine the capability of prospect theory to explain the motivation of this type of earnings management. If the preferences of the stakeholders are consistent with the prospect theory, then the manager has an incentive to report earnings that exceed the threshold, or the reference point, such as zero earnings levels or zero earnings changes, to obtain more rewards.
 
Research Hypotheses
       Based on the theoretical literature and the conducted studies, research hypotheses were developed as follows:
 
Primary Hypotheses
       1- Earnings are managed to avoid losses.
       2- Earnings are managed to avoid earnings decreases.
 
Secondary Hypotheses
       1- In the case of earnings management to avoid losses, zero scaled earnings is the reference point corresponding to prospect theory
       2- In the case of earnings management to avoid earnings decrease, zero scaled earnings change is the reference point corresponding to prospect theory
 
Methods
       In this research, our data were obtained from the Iranian database of Tehran Stock Exchange (Rah Avard Novin). The sample was selected from the period 2009-2013. We investigate two earnings variables. One is earnings level and the other is earnings change. For the earnings level variable, we used 908 firm-year observations and for the earnings change variable, there are 917 firm-year observations. We used annual net earnings to measure first threshold, which is avoiding losses and annual net earnings changes to measure second threshold, which is avoiding earnings decreases. The earnings observations are drawn from a broad range of firm sizes and are therefore scaled. The earnings variable is scaled by beginning-of-the-year market value of common equity. We present two types of evidence to determine whether earnings management leads to avoiding earnings decreases and losses. First, we present graphical evidence in the form of histograms of the pooled cross-sectional empirical distributions of scaled earnings changes and levels of earnings. Second, we investigate the significance of any irregularities around the zero point via Burgstahler and Dichev statistical method.
 
Results
       The results of this research show that at a confidence level of 95%, earnings are managed to avoid losses. On the other words, we find that more firms than expected report small positive earnings in the Tehran Stock Exchange. However, there is no evidence to support that earnings are managed to avoid earnings decrease. Moreover, the findings show that the prospect theory can be used to explain the reasons and motives of earnings management to avoid losses.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
       This paper provides compelling empirical evidence that earnings are managed to avoid losses. Earnings distributions show unexpectedly high frequencies of observations above the zero scaled earnings and unexpectedly low frequencies of observations below the zero scaled earnings. In addition, findings show that Kahneman and Tversky’s ‘prospect theory’ provide possible explanation for such behavior. From a psychological perspective, prospect theory postulates that decision-makers derive value from gains and losses with respect to a reference point, rather than from absolute levels of wealth. This captures the notion that losses are more displeasing than the equivalent gain. Thus, individuals derive the highest value when wealth moves from a loss to a gain relative to reference points. Firms above the earnings threshold are found to be risk averters while firms below the earnings threshold are found to be risk lovers. However, the study has several limitations. The earnings distribution approach does not capture the magnitude of earnings management. Furthermore, it does not specify the methods by which earnings are managed.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Avoid Losses
  • Avoid Earnings Decrease
  • Earning Distribution Approach
  • Earnings Management
  • Prospect Theory
باباجانی، جعفر؛ تحریری، آرش؛ ثقفی، علی و بدری، احمد (1393). رابطه‌ی بین عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی و مدیریت سود. مجله‌ی پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 6 (2): 26-1.
بزاززاده، حمیدرضا و دهقان، منصور (1390). وجه نقد حاصل از عملیات و مدیریت سود. فصلنامه‌ی حسابداری مدیریت، 9: 40-23.
پورحیدری، امید و افلاطون، عباس (1385). بررسی انگیزه‌های هموارسازی سود در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه‌یبررسی‌هایحسابداریوحسابرسی، 13 (44)، 77-50.
سعیدی، علی؛ حمیدیان، نرگس و ربیعی، حامد (1391). رابطه‌ی بین فعالیت‌های مدیریت سود واقعی و عملکرد آتی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه‌ی حسابداری مدیریت، 6 (17): 58-45.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ مهرانی، ساسان؛ مهرانی، کاوه و کرمی، غلام‌رضا (1384). نقش اقلام تعهدی اختیاری در مدیریت سود شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه‌ی بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 12 (42)، 74-61.
مهدوی، غلامحسین و زارع حسین‌آبادی، علی (1390). بررسی ارتباط بین خطای سود پیش‌بینی‌شده و اقلام تعهدی کل شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه‌ی بورس اوراق بهادار، 4 (16): 78 -57.
کردستانی، غلام‌رضا؛ معصومی، جواد و بقایی، وحید (1392). پیش‌بینی سطح مدیریت سود با استفاده از شبکه‌های عصبی مصنوعی. مجله‌ی پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 5(1): 190-169.
هاشمی، سید عباس؛ مرادی کوپایی، مهدی (1393). بررسیاهمیتتحققآستانه‌یسودسالقبلازدیدگاهسرمایه‌گذاران. مجله‌ی پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 6(1): 194-175.
 
 
ب. انگلیسی
Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. R. (2002). Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547-570.
Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99-126.
Burgstahler, D. (2014). Discussion of “The shapes of scaled earnings histograms are not due to scaling and sample selection: Evidence from distributions of reported earnings per share.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 522-530.
Burgstahler, D., & Chuk, E. (2015). Do scaling and selection explain earnings discontinuities? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 168-186.
Charoenwong, C., & Jiraporn, P. (2009). Earnings management to exceed thresholds: Evidence from Singapore and Thailand. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19(3), 221-236.
Chen, S. K., Lin, B., Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2010). The frequency and magnitude of earnings management: Time-series and multi-threshold comparisons. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(4), 671-685.
Daske, H., Gebhardt, G., & Mcleay, S. (2006). The distribution of earnings relative to targets in the European Union. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3), 137-167.
Defond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 115-139.
Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business, 72(1), 1-33.
Durtschi, C., & Easton, P. (2009). Earnings management? Erroneous inferences based on earnings frequency distributions. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(5), 1249-1281.
Fiegenbaum, A. (1990). Prospect theory and the risk-return association. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 14(2), 187-203.
Gilliam, T. A., Heflin, F., & Paterson, J. S. (2015). Evidence that the zero-earnings discontinuity has disappeared. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 117-132.
Hamdi‚ F. M., & Zarai, M. A. (2012). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses: Empirical evidence from Islamic Banking Industry. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3 (3),225.
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
Holland, D., & Ramsay, A. (2003). Do Australian companies manage earnings to meet simple earnings benchmarks? Finance Accounting and Finance, 43(1), 41-62.
Johnson, M., Lindblom, H., & Platan, P. (2002). Behavioral finance and change of investor behavior during and after the speculative bubble at the end of the 1990s (Unpublished Master's thesis). University of Lund.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263.
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2012). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201-224.
Koonce, L. L., & Mercer, M. (2005). Using psychology theories in archival financial accounting research. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Martinez, A. L. (2005). Earnings management in Brazil: Motivation and consequences. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Mcnichols, M. F. (2000). Research design issues in earnings management studies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4-5), 313-345.
Pududu, M. L., & Villiers, C. D. (2016). Earnings management through loss Avoidance: Does South Africa have a good story to tell? South African Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 19(1), 18-34.
Reis, E. M., Lamounier, W. M., & Bressan, V. G. (2015). Avoiding reporting losses: An empirical study of earnings management via operating decisions. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(69), 247-260.
Scott, W. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (6th ed). Toronto: Pearson Canada.
Suda, K., & Shuto, A. (2005). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses: Empirical evidence from Japan. SSRN.
Vidal, O. B. (2009.). Earnings management and thresholds: Are manipulated amounts significant? SSRN,
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Management earnings forecasts and analyst forecasts: Evidence from mandatory disclosure system. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 133-146.
Wasiuzzaman, S., Sahafzadeh, I., & Nejad, N. (2015). Prospect theory, industry characteristics and earnings management. Review of Accounting and Finance, 14(3), 324-347.