Designing structures that affect performance-based budgeting with emphasis on actor network theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, & Instructor, Department of Accounting, Payamnor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics, Management, and Social Sciences

10.22099/jaa.2023.45244.2286

Abstract

1- Purpose
The purpose of this research is to measure the implementation of performance-based budgeting in the three dimensions of strategic planning, cost analysis and performance management. Also, identifying and discovering effective actors on the implementation of performance-based budgeting is another goal of this study.
 
2- Methodology
This research is applied in terms of purpose and survey type. The questionnaire and data collection tools were collected through the distribution of 152 questionnaires among budgeting experts, accountants, senior managers and financial managers in 1401. Data analysis was done using structural equation method and SmartPLS software version 3.
 
3- Findings
The findings showed that the implementation of performance-based budgeting in the dimensions of strategic planning, cost analysis, and performance management is 34.38%, 25.95%, 31.54%, respectively. Also, the findings showed that the actors directly and indirectly influencing the implementation of performance-based budgeting include economic actors, technical actors, management competence and organizational commitment.
 
4- Conclusion
Based on the results of the research, it can be said that in order to implement performance-based budgeting, the existing procedure in the dimensions of financial knowledge of the organization, environmental activists, and organizational commitment should be redesigned and reconsidered. Also, the dimensions of technical actors (accounting information system and networks), economic actors (program and budget organization) and management competence and organizational culture should be modified and strengthened from a technical and supervisory point of view.
 
5- Contribution
Considering the requirement of performance-based budgeting, in the studies conducted so far, issues such as feasibility and implementation obstacles have been addressed, so in this study, the focus is on the implementation of performance-based budgeting and the interactive role of actors. The results of this study can be effective in attracting the attention of senior executive managers and academic researchers and supporting and modifying the dimensions that affect the implementation of budgeting, as well as expanding theoretical foundations in the field of performance-based budgeting.
 
Keywords: Performance-Based Budgeting, Actor Network Theory, Bayesian Approach, Public Sector.
 
 
 

Keywords

References

Adhikari P., Kuruppu C., Ouda, H. Grossi, G. & Ambalangodage, D. (2021). Unintended consequences inimplementing public sector accountingre forms in emergingeconomies: Evidencefrom Egypt, Nepand Sri Lankaal, 87(4) 870–887.
Aleksandrov, E. Bourmistrov, A. & Grossi, G. (2020). Performance budgeting as a creative distraction of accountability relations in one russian municipality, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies,10 (3), 399-424.
Alsharari, N.M. (2016). The diffusion of accounting innovations in the new public sectoras influenced by IMF reforms: Actor-Network theory. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation, 8 (4), 26-51.
Amirkhani, T. Aghaz, A. & Sheikh, A. (2019). An implementation model of performance-based budgeting: Evidence from the Iranian healthcare sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(2), 382-404.
Banitalebi, B., Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Nikomaram, H. & Talebnia, Gh. (2015). Clarifying the role of Actor Network Theory (ANT) for the Accounting of information system in Iran. Technological Advances of Engineering Sciences, 36(4), 2203-2213.
Caiden, E. & Caiden, J. (1998). Approaches and guidelines for monitoring, measuring and evaluating performance in public sector programs. Korean Review of Public Administration, 3(2), 7-42.
Cinquini, L. & Mitchell, F. (2005). Success in management accounting: lessonsfrom the activity-based costing/management experience. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 1(1), 63–78.
Chin, W. W. (1988). The partial least Squares Approach to Structuralequation Modeling in G.A. Macrolides. (Ed.). Modern methods for businessresearch, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
Damanpour, F. & Schneider, M. (2006). phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17 (3), 215–236.
Desouza Amaral, T. Arajode souza junior, A, Dasilva Bandeira, R. & Luizreis, D. (2020). Using the ABC costing system-activity-based costing to calculate costs in the public sector, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(7), 188-202.
De Vries H, Bekkers V and Tummers L (2016) Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration 94(1), 146–166.
Elder-Vass, D. (2019). Actor-Network Theory. SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Methods Press. Loughborough University. Retrieved from https: //dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/27615.
Erkutlu, V. H., Tanç, G., and Koçyiğit, C. (2017). The factors used to create performance-based budgeting: A research on Turkey, Accounting and Corporate Reporting - Today and Tomorrow, 297-313. Intechopen Publising.
Gosselin, M., and Journeault, M. (2022). The Implementation of Activity-Based Costing by a localgovernment: An Actor-Networktheory and Trial of Strength Perspective, 19 (1), 18-44.
Greiling, D. (2005). performance measurement in the public sector: The german experience, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 551-567.
Heckerman, D., Mamdani, A. & Wellman, M. P. (1995). Real-World applications of bayesian networks. Communications of the ACM, 38 (3), 24-26.
Hijal-Moghrabi, I. (2017). The current practice of performance-based budgeting in the largest U. S. cities: An innovation theory perspective. Journal of Public Performance and Management a Review, 40 (4), 652-675.
Ho, A. T. (2018). From performance budgeting to performance budget management: Theory and practice, Public Administration Review, 78(5), 748-758.
Hoek, P. V. D. M. (2005). From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: The dutch experience. Public Budgeting and Finance, 25(1), 32-45.
Hooze´e, S. & Hansen, S. (2018). A comparison of activity-based costing and time-driven activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(1), 143-167.
Hurt, R. L. (2008). Accounting Information System, Basic Concepts and Current Issues, McGrawHill: 3.
Jeacle, I. (2017). The popular pursuit of DIY: Exploring the role of calculative technologies in an actor network, Management Accounting Research, (35), 99-109.
Lasch, O. (2018). An actor-network perspective on business models. Journal of Long Range Planning. 52(3),406-426
Leithe, J. L. (1997). implementing performance measurement in government: illustrations and resources, Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.
Leth, M., Jakobsen, F. and Pallesen, T. (2017). Performance budgeting in practice: the case of danish hospital management, Public Organization Review, 17(2), 255-273.
Macnab, A. and Mitchell, F. (2014). Outcome budgeting in the public sector: Challenges and solutions. an exploratory empirical study, In World Congress of Accountants.
Martin, L. L. (2002). Budgeting for outcomes. In A. Khan & B. Hildreth (Eds.), Budget Theory in the Public Sector: 246–260.
Mauro, S. Cinquini, L. & Sinervo, L. (2018). Actors’ dynamics towards performance- based budgeting: A mix of change and stability? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31 (2), 158-177.
Melkers, J. E. & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters' views of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review, 61 (1), 54-64.
Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
Oconnell, B. & Delange, P. (2014). Understanding the application of actor- network theory in process of accounting change. Working Paper.
OECD. (2014). Budgeting practices and procedures in OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oyewo, B. (2021). Do innovation attributes reallydrive the diffusion of management aaccounting innovations? Examination of factors determining usage intensity of strategic management accounting, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22 (3), 507-538.
Pratolo, S., Sofyani, H. & Anwar, M. (2020). Performance-based budgeting implementation in higher education institutions: Determinants and Impact on Quality, Cogent Business & Management, 7, 1-22.
Redburn, F. S. Shea, R. J. & Buss, T. F. (2007). Performance management and budgeting: How governments can learn from experience, ME Sharpe, New York, NY.
Srivastava, A. Kumar, N. & Kumar, p. (2015). Bayesian analysis of working dapital management on corporate profitability: Evidence from India, Journal of Economic Studies, 44(4), 568-584.
Shick, ­A. (2007). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting: Decision rules or analytic tools? OECD Gournal on Budjeting, 7(2), 109-138
Schick, A. (2014). The metamorphoses of performance budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13, 4, 79.
Surianti, M. & Dalimunthe, A. R. (2017). The implementation of performance based budgeting in public sector (Indonesia Case: A Literature Review, International Journal of Developing and Emerging Economies, 5(2), 52-67.
Viapiana, F. (2020). A performance-based budget in the judiciary: Allocation of resource and performance variability in first instance courts. An analysis of three case studies, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31 (4), 1-30.
Umobong, A. A. & Bele-Egberi, A. (2019). Performance based compensation and firm value of commercial banks in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 10(10), 191-176.
Wang, X. (1999). Conditions to Implement Outcome-Oriented Performance Budgeting: Some Empirical Evidence, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 11(4), 533-552.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). Political implication of budgetary reform. ­ Public Administration Review, 21(4) 183-190.
Worrell, J. Wask, M. & Johnston, A. (2013). Social network analysis in accounting information systems research, Journal of International Accounting Information Systems, 14 (2), 127-137.
Wu, W.W. (2010). Linking bayesian networks and pls path modeling for causalanalysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 134-139.
Yamamoto, K. (1999). Accounting system reform in Japanese local governments. Financial Accountability & Management. 15(3), 291-307.
Yazdifar, H. Askarany, D. Wickramsinghe, D. Nasseri, A. & Alam, Md A. (2019). The diffusion of management accountinginnovations in Dependent (Subsidiary) organizationsand MNCs. The International Journal of Accounting, 54(1), 1-42.
Zemrani, A. (2019). Budgeting in The United States: From theory to practice using higher education. In: de Vries, M., Nemec, J., Špaček, D. (eds) Performance-Based Budgeting in the Public Sector. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
 
  
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 November 2022
  • Revise Date: 22 May 2023
  • Accept Date: 15 May 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics