Identifying the Effect of Earnings Management on Measures of Tax Avoidance: Implications for Empirical Research

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 shahid beheshti university

2 Associate Prof. Shahid Beheshti University

3 Assistant Prof.Shahid Beheshti University

10.22099/jaa.2022.43918.2248

Abstract

Introduction

There are contradictory results in some areas of tax avoidance literature that raise the question that if the measure of tax avoidance represents truly the concept and what components they are included. The most of measures of tax avoidance use pretax financial accounting income as a benchmark so earnings management methods might affect them. This can bias research results and researchers should pay attention to the effect. They need to separate the effect because it represents different underlying actions of managers.
 

Hypothesis

The purpose of this study is to present a theoretical framework and relevant empirical tests to examine the fact that measures of tax avoidance reflect what types of tax avoidance and when they identify tax avoidance related to or unrelated to earnings management. In this research, four types of tax avoidance will be used to provide a theoretical framework that how measures of tax avoidance reflect these four types of tax avoidance. Any type of tax avoidance represents different underlying actions of managers and might be considered differently by policymakers and researchers.
 

Methods

Comparative statics analysis will be used to determine the role of earnings management on measures of tax avoidance. in empirical tests, the annual data of 153 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2012 to 2020 were analyzed. our tests examine the extent to which measures of tax avoidance are affected by earnings management and will be relied on previous research.
In the first test, Givoly et al. (2010) will be followed to examine the distributional properties of earnings around the zero earnings growth threshold for firm-year observations that are defined to have above median levels of tax avoidance for each given measure.
the second test is based on the sign and magnitude of unexpected accruals for those observations that fall above the earnings threshold. This test follows the intuition of Givoly et al. (2010) that firms that are managing earnings to meet thresholds will be more likely to have positive unexpected accruals without which they would not have met the threshold.
 
 

Results

Most studies use pretax financial accounting income as a benchmark when they are going to measure tax avoidance. That is the reason for the effect of earnings management on measures of tax avoidance. A firm might be considered to have tax avoidance if the firm manages earnings upward without paying additional tax on the managed earnings. The results demonstrate that COF ETR that has been used in prior research - the ratio of cash taxes paid to pretax operating cash flows - captures less likely tax avoidance that is unrelated to earnings management. The results imply that pretax income aggregates over a longer period such as five years do not mitigate the relation with earnings management. The results indicate that the distributions of Cash ETRs and CFO ETRs are significantly different from each other for the one-, three-, and five-year ETR measures.
 

Discussion and Conclusion

The differentiation of tax avoidance related to or unrelated to earnings management is important because each effect suggests different underlying actions by managers and might be viewed differently by researchers and policymakers. In this study, the recognition of the numerator and denominator effect is a practical concept. For example, when a researcher can find tax avoidance by using Cash ETR and can not find tax avoidance using CFO ETR, it does not mean there is no tax avoidance. this can imply the company avoids tax with increasing income that reflects the denominator effect. If the researcher can find tax avoidance using CFO ETR too, it means the company avoids tax with decreasing tax payments that reflect the numerator effect. Using CFO ETR in empirical studies can help interpret inconsistent results in some studies of literature and avoid attributing earnings management results to tax avoidance. according to this, when CFO ETR is unable to capture tax avoidance, not necessarily imply there is no tax avoidance but it contains the data about the type of tax avoidance. We suggest to future researchers separate types of tax avoidance in their models in vague areas of literature. This can avoid attributing earnings management results to tax avoidance.
 
 
 

Keywords

References

 Badertscher, B., S. Katz, S. Rego, and R. Wilson. )2019(. Conforming tax avoidance and capital market pressure. The Accounting Review, 94(6): 1–30.
Barzegari Khanaghah, J., and M. Ghadakforoushan. (2020). Designing a tax risk assessment model and its effect on the value of companies listed on the iranian capital market. Financial Research Journal, 22(2): 266-296. (in Persian)
Blaylock, B., T. Shevlin, and R. Wilson. )2012(. Long-term tax avoidance, large positive book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1): 91–120.
Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. )1997(. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1): 99–126.
Chung, S., B. Goh, J. Lee, and T. Shevlin. )2015(. Corporate tax aggressiveness and managerial rent extraction: Evidence from insider trading. Working paper, Wayne State University, Singapore Management University, and University of California, Irvine.
De Simone, L., J. Nickerson, J. Seidman, and B. Stomberg. )2020(. How reliably do empirical tests identify tax avoidance? Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(3): 1536–1561.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. )1995(. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2): 193–225.
Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. )1999(. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business, 72(1): 1–33.
Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew. )2008(. Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1): 61–82.
Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew. )2010(. The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4): 1163–1189.
Edwards, A., A. Kubata, and T. Shevlin. (2021). The decreasing trend in US cash effective tax rates: The role of growth in pre-tax income. The Accounting Review, 96(5): 231-261.‏
Elgers, P., R. Pfeiffer, and S. Porter. )2003(. Anticipatory income smoothing: A re-examination. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(3): 405–422.
Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew. )2004(. How much will firms pay for earnings that do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. The Accounting Review, 79(2): 387–408.
Etemadih, H., and M. A. Sari. )2019(. Exploring effect of tax avoidance on tax risk. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(33): 353–375. (in Persian)
Frank, M. M., L. Lynch, and S. Rego. )2009(. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2): 467–496.
Givoly, D., C. Hayn, and S. Katz. )2010(. Does public ownership of equity improve earnings quality? The Accounting Review, 85(1): 195– 25.
Green, D. H., and J. N. Kerr. (2022). How Do Firms Use Cash Tax Savings? A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 44(1): 93-121.‏
Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. )1997(. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1): 1–34.
Guenther, D. A., L. K. Krull, and B. M. Williams. (2021). Identifying different types of tax avoidance: Implications for empirical research. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 43(1): 27-50.‏
Guenther, D. A., R. J. Wilson, and K. Wu. (2019). Tax uncertainty and incremental tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 94(2): 229-247.
Guenther, D. A., S. R. Matsunaga, and B. M. Williams. )2017(. Is tax avoidance related to firm risk? The Accounting Review, 92(1): 115-136.
Hanlon, M. )2005(. The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1): 137–166.
Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman. )2010(. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2/3): 127–178.
Henry, E., and R. Sansing. )2018(. Corporate tax avoidance: Data truncation and loss firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(3): 1042–1070.
Hribar, P. and D. W. Collins. )2002(. Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1): 105–134.
Huang, J. )2018(. Foreign earnings management of U.S. multinational companies: The role of decision rights. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(5): 552–574.
Jahromi, M. and B. Mashyekhi. )2021(. Present a framework for income tax accounting in iran. Journal of Accounting Advance, 13(2): 69–96. (in Persian)
Kavianifard, H., S. Khajavi, and F. Avazzadeh Fath. )2021(. Investigating the usefulness of relief and correlation variable selection methods in identifying optimal predictor variables affecting aggressive tax policy. Journal of Accounting Advance, 13(1): 335–377. (in Persian)
Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. )2005(. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1): 163–197.
Lev, B., and D. Nissim. )2004(. Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The Accounting Review, 79(4): 1039–1074.
Lim, S. C., and S. Lustgarten. )2002(. Testing for income smoothing using the backing out method: A review of specification issues. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(3): 273–290.
McGuire, S., D. Wang, and R. Wilson. )2014(. Dual class ownership and tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 89(4): 1487–1516.
Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. Rego. )2003(. Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review, 78(2): 491–521.
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Z. Dianati Deilami, and F. Fakhari. )2017(.Cash effective tax rate as a criterion of tax avoidance or earnings management. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting, 7(4): 93–116. (in Persian)
Shevlin, T., and S. Porter. )1992(. The corporate tax comeback in 1987: Some further evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 14(1): 58–79.
Wilde, J. H. and R. J. Wilson. )2018(. Perspectives on corporate tax planning: Observations from the past decade. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2): 63–81.
Wilson, R. J. )2009(. An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3): 969–999.
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 13 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 13 November 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics