Provide an Environmental Financial Auditing Pattern to Monitor Iranian State-owned Companies

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch, Yazd , Iran

3 assistant professor, Islamic azad university, yazd, iran

10.22099/jaa.2022.44115.2253

Abstract

Introduction
Environmental auditing has become a tool for maintaining and achieving environmental pollution control standards, and the lack of a pattern for environmental financial auditing to oversee the supreme audit court of Iran of state-owned companies is one of the challenges of not doing Environmental Financial Auditing. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide an environmental financial auditing pattern to monitor Iranian state-owned companies.
 

Research Questions or hypothesis

 This research lacks a hypothesis and will answer the following research questions: a) What are the appropriate indicators for Environmental financial auditing to monitor state-owned companies? b) What is the importance of these indicators? c) What is the appropriate pattern for Environmental financial auditing to monitor state-owned companies?
 

Methods

In this study, first the initial indicators were identified based on the study of research literature and statistical method of qualitative content analysis. Then, in the fall of 1400,  35 auditors of the supreme audit court of Iran were interviewed as experts who were selected by the snowball judgment method, and the initial indicators identified by the Delphi statistical method were finalized. Next, using 50 finalized questionnaires and a new analytical methodology, Interpretive Structural Modelling and the relationships between the indicators were determined by MATLAB and Excel software, and the ISM graph was plotted in an integrated manner. Finally, using MICMAC analysis, the penetration power and dependence of the identified indicators were evaluated and the final pattern was drawn. Validity was calculated as content and reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
 

Results

The environmental financial auditing pattern for supervising Iranian state-owned companies has the indicators of environmental accounting standards, environmental standards and guidelines published by INTOSAI and ASOSAI, environmental audit guidelines and standards of the supreme audit court of Iran and accepted accounting principles.
 

Discussion and Conclusion

Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis were used to analyze the relationships between the indicators and provide a suitable pattern. In the method of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) statistical method, the results showed that the indicators of environmental accounting standards and accepted accounting principles are at level (2) and are effective indicators in the pattern. Indicators of environmental standards and guidelines published by INTOSAI and ASOSAI and guidelines and environmental auditing standards of the supreme audit court of Iran are at level (1) and have the least impact on the pattern. In MICMAC analysis, the results showed that the indicators of environmental accounting standards and accepted accounting principles with high influence and low dependence were identified as independent indicators. Also, the indicators of environmental standards and guidelines published by INTOSAI and ASOSAI and the guidelines and environmental auditing standards of the supreme audit court of Iran were identified as dependent indicators with low penetration power and high dependence.
 
Keywords: Environmental financial audit, Monitoring, Iranian state-owned companies, Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM)
 
 
 

Keywords


 
Auditing guidelines for activities with an environmental perspective. (2001). INTOSAI 5110. Guidance on Conducting Audits of Activities with an Environmental Perspective. Retrieved from www.issai.org
Cao, H, Zhang, L, Qi, Y, Yang, Z & Li, X, (2022). Government auditing and environmental governance: Evidence from China's auditing system reform. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93
Cho, C.H, Senn, J & Sobkowiak, M, (2022). Sustainability at stake during COVID-19: Exploring the role of accounting in addressing environmental crises. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82
Cook, W, Van B. S, & Turnhout, E, (2016). Inside environmental auditing: effectiveness, objectivity, and transparency. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 33–39.
Faisal, M. N, Banwet, D. K, & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12, 535-552.
Guthrie, J.E. & Parker, L.D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest accounting, 3, 59-76.
Ikani Ocheni, S, (2016). Environmental Auditing: A Panacea for Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria. International Academy of Business Review, Volume 3, Number 1
Mandal, A, & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 14, 52-59.
Ravi, V, & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Changes, 72, 1011-1022.