The Effect of Information Risk on the Relationship between Abnormal Audit Report Delays and Abnormal Stock Returns

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Asistance Prof in Accounting, Department of accounting, Hashtrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hashtrood, Iran

2 Associate Prof in Accounting. Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
Introduction
The results of audit report are one of the tools to ensure the accuracy of financial statement information. If this report is available to users with unusual delays, it may affect investors' expectations of financial statement information while enhancing the information reliability and reducing the information timeliness. And if this delay is accompanied by more information risk and information inequality, investors' expectations of the company's value will change significantly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of information risk on relationship between abnormal audit report delay and abnormal stock returns.
Hypothesis
According to the aforementioned theoretical foundations and previous researches such as Habib and Huang (2019), Lu et al. (2020), Blankley et al. (2014), Nikinen and Sahlstrom (2015), Zhang et al. (2013) and Sharad ( 2014) based on the reasons for abnormal delays in the audit report, investors' perception of these reasons and creating a balance between reliability and timeliness of the information obtained from the report with abnormal audit delays on the one hand and the scope of confidential information and the scope of confidential information and information risk as a sign of Information inequality and the existence of new information with important information content, from other hand, which affects the expected return of investors in the market and causes adjustment and revision of their previous expectations, the research hypotheses were formulated as follows:
 
The sales growth fluctuation affects the financial statements comparability.
The cash flows fluctuation affects the financial statements comparability.
The competition proprietary costs moderates the effect of sales fluctuation on financial statements comparability.
The competition proprietary costs moderates the effect of sales growth fluctuations on financial statements comparability.
The competition proprietary costs moderates the effect of cash flow fluctuations on financial statements comparability.
 
Method
 To test research hypotheses, the data of 123 companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2012-2019 and multivariate regression has been used.
 Results
 The results of the research hypotheses test showed that with increasing abnormal delay in the audit report, abnormal stock returns increase and information risk while having a positive effect on abnormal stock returns, intensifies the effect of abnormal delay of the auditor report on abnormal returns. That is, abnormal delays in the audit report and information risk, as variables with significant information content and a sign of problematic information and private information, fundamentally change investors' expectations, which affect abnormal returns.
Conclusion
 It can be said that delays in the audit report have informative content and affect market expectations. In other words, the abnormal length of the audit report, both in terms of increasing the effectiveness of the audit and strengthening the reliability of information, and in terms of auditing problematic financial statements and reducing the timeliness of information, provides new information for investors that corrects or strengthens investors' expectations of previous forecasts. Also, despite the information risk and information asymmetry or confidential information within the organization, abnormal delays in the audit report send a more negative signal to the market and also affect market expectations for the results of the audit report. However, due to the implementation of the risk-based audit process, the existence of high information risk for audit firms is a reason for further consideration and audit risk management, which further delays the audit report and thus signals negative news to the market to revise capital expectations.
 
 

Keywords


  • Abdoli, M., Gayoumi, A., &  Partovi, N. (2013). The Effects of Auditor’s Characteristics on the Financial Restatement. Accounting and Auditing Review, 20(3), 85-100. (in Persian)
  • Abernathy, J. L., Barnes, M., Stefaniak, C., & Weisbarth, A. (2017). An international perspective on audit report lag: A synthesis of the literature and opportunities for future research. International Journal of Auditing21(1), 100-127.
  • Ahlatcıoğlu, A., & Okay, N. (2021). Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey. Borsa Istanbul Review21(1), 92-103.
  • Bakhshinejad, M. (2019). The effect of information transfer on the impact of abnormal returns on business strategy of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 11(4), 1-22. (in Persian)
  • Bartov, E., DeFond, M., & Konchitchki, Y. (2011). Capital Market Consequences of Filing Late 10-Qs and 10-Ks. New York University Law and Economics Working Papers, Paper 254.Availableat:http://lsr.nellc org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi.
  • Bayat, A., & Ahmadi, S.A. (2014). Audit report lag and iming of Financial Reporting, Journal of Financial Accounting and Auditing, 6(22), 97-121. (in Persian)
  • Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2004). Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review79(2), 277-304.
  • Berkman, H., Dimitrov, V., Jain, P. C., Koch, P. D., & Tice, S. (2009). Sell on the news: Differences of opinion, short-sales constraints, and returns around earnings announcements. Journal of Financial Economics92(3), 376-399.
  • Bharath, S. T., Pasquariello, P., & Wu, G. (2009). Does asymmetric information drive capital structure decisions? The review of financial studies22(8), 3211-3243.
  • Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., & MacGregor, J. E. (2014). The relationship between audit report lags and future restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory33(2), 27-57.
  • Brown, S., & Hillegeist, S. A. (2007). How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry. Review of accounting studies12(2), 443-477.
  • Chan, K. H., Luo, V. W., & Mo, P. L. (2016). Determinants and implications of long audit reporting lags: evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research46(2), 145-166.
  • Chen, C., Huang, A. G., & Jha, R. (2010). Idiosyncratic return volatility, economic activity, and managerial discretion. Working Paper, University of Waterloo.1-45.
  • Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R., & Zhang, L. (2011). An alternative three-factor model. Available at SSRN 1418117.
  • Chen, Y., Gul, F. A., Truong, C., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2016). Auditor client specific knowledge and internal control weakness: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and geographic distance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics12(2), 121-140.
  • Choi, H. M. (2018). A tale of two uncertainties. Journal of Banking & Finance92, 81-99.
  • De Cesari, A., & Huang-Meier, W. (2015). Dividend changes and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 1-17.
  • Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The accounting review77(s-1), 35-59.
  • Dempsey, M., & Li, A. (2017). Is post earnings announcement drift a priced risk factor in emerging markets? Chinese evidence. Archives of Business Research5(6).
  • Dong, B., & Robinson, D. (2018). Auditor-client geographic proximity and audit report timeliness. Advances in Accounting40(5), 11-19.
  • Ebrahimi, S., Bahraminasab, A., Karimi, E. (2019). The interactive effect of the auditor's size on the relationship between political connections, financial helplessness and agency costs in the Companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting Advances, 11(2), 1-34. (in Persian)
  • Eyvazlu, R., Ghahramani, A., & Ajam, A. (2017). Analyzing the Performance of Fama and French Five-factor Model Using GRS Test. Financial Research Journal, 18(4), 691-714. (in Persian)
  • Ghaemi, M., &Taghizadeh, M. (2016). Studying the effect of information risk and transaction costs on stock market reaction to earnings news. Accounting and Auditing Review, 23(2), 235-252. (in Persian)
  • Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag. Journal of international accounting, auditing and taxation20(1), 32-44.
  • Habib, A., & Huang, H. J. (2019). Abnormally long audit report lags and future stock price crash risk: evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance.
  • Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Huang, H. J., & Miah, M. S. (2019). Determinants of audit report lag: A meta‐International journal of auditing23(1), 20-44.
  • Haghighat, H., & alavi, S. (2013). Investigation the Relationship between Earnings Transparency and Abnormal Returns in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 5(1), 1-12. (in Persian)
  • Kashanipour, M., Maranjouri, M., & Moshashei, M. (1391). Investigating the Relationship between Auditor's tenure and Discretionary Accruals, 10th National Accounting Conference, Al-Zahra University, 85-100. (in Persian)
  • Knechel, W. R., Rouse, P., & Schelleman, C. (2009). A modified audit production framework: Evaluating the relative efficiency of audit engagements. The Accounting Review84(5), 1607-1638.
  • Kothari, S.P. (2000). The role of financial reporting in reducing financial risks in the market. In Conference Series-Federal Reserve Bank of Boston(Vol. 44, pp. 89-102). Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; 1998.
  • Lobo, G. J., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review88(4), 1385-1412.
  • Lu, S., Xuan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Do Abnormal Audit Report Lags Signal Impending Stock Price Crash?.Accounting Research, 22(4), 79-107.
  • Luo, W. (2012). Determinants and implications of audit reporting lags in China. A thesis for Degree of Master of Philosophy in Business. Lingnan University.
  • Mahdavi, G., & DehghaniSaadi, A. (2016). Role of Mediator of Abnormal Audit Report Delay in Explaining Relationship between Earnings Quality and Firm Value. Journal of Knowledge Accounting, 7(26), 107-130. (in Persian)
  • Mansouri sernjianeh, M., & Tanani, M. (2013). Stock Market Reaction to Abnormal Audit Fees. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 5(4), 105-120. (in Persian)
  • Meckfessel, M. D., & Sellers, D. (2017). The impact of Big 4 consulting on audit reporting lag and restatements. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32 (1):19 – 49.
  • Mendenhall, R. R. (2004). Arbitrage risk and post‐earnings‐announcement drift. The Journal of Business77(4), 875-894.
  • Mollaimani, V., & Marfou, M. (2015). The relationship between Disclosure Quality and Audit Report Lag. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 12(45), 59-80. (in Persian)
  • Nikkinen, J., & Sahlström, P. (2005). Risk in audit pricing: The role of firm-specific dimensions of risk. Advances in International Accounting18(19), 141-151.
  • Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2009). Learning in financial markets.  Rev. Financ. Econ.1(1), 361-381.
  • Penman, S. H., & Zhu, J. L. (2014). Accounting anomalies, risk, and return. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1835-1866.
  • Pradipta, A., & Zalukhu, A. G. (2020). Audit Report Lag: Specialized Auditor and Corporate Governance. Pradipta, A, 41-48.
  • Rahmani, H., & Bekhradinasab, V. (2016). The effect of normal and abnormal delays in the process of publishing and presenting the auditor's report on the auditor's independence, audit knowledge, 17(67), 265-286. (in Persian)
  • Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2011). Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility. Journal of Accounting and Economics51(1-2), 1-20.
  • Safari Gerayli, M. (2017). Abnormal Audit Report Lags and Future Restatements: Moderating Role of Economic Bonding and auditor industry specialization. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 6(23), 155-168. (in Persian)
  • Saleem, S., & Usman, M. (2021). Information risk and cost of equity: The role of stock price crash risk. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), 623-635.
  • Schelleman, C., & Knechel, W. R. (2010). Short-term accruals and the pricing and production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory29(1), 221-250.
  • Sharad, K. (2014). The Timeliness of Quarterly Financial Reports of Companies in Malaysia. Working Paper. Online at www. ssrn. com.
  • Tabatabaei, A., hashemi, S., amiri, H. (2020). The Effect of Risk Disclosure and its Types on Crash Stock Price Risk. Journal of Accounting Advances, 12(2), 191-229. (in Persian)
  • Tanyi, P., Raghunandan, K., & Barua, A. (2010). Audit report lags after voluntary and involuntary auditor changes. Accounting Horizons24(4), 671-688.
  • Wang, X. (2009). Do abnormal audit fees/non-audit fees communicate firm specific information to the stock market? A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.171.
  • Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting horizons17(3), 207-221.
  • Zafar, N., Urooj, S. F., & Durrani, T. K. (2008). Interest rate volatility and stock return and volatility. European journal of economics, finance and administrative sciences14(1), 135-140.
  • Zhang, Q., Cai, C. X., & Keasey, K. (2013). Market reaction to earnings news: A unified test of information risk and transaction costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics56(2-3), 251-266.