The Study of the Relationship Between the Accounting Comparability and Earnings Management

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Accountant - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences - Iran

2 Professor Department of Accounting Faculty of Economics and Administrative scien Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad (FUM)

Abstract

Comparative capability is one of the qualitative features of information in the theoretical foundations of accounting and financial reporting that enables users of financial statements to identify and understand the similarities and differences between the two sets of information and to make their own decisions. Managing earnings by manipulating financial statements misleads users of financial statements, which is possible by using two methods of manipulating accruals and actuals. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between comparability of financial statements and earnings management. The purpose of this study is applied and methodological is correlational. In this study, the comparability of financial statements has been measured using the Di Franco et al. (2011) model, accrual profit management using the Kutari et al. (2005) model, and actual earnings management using the risk model (2006). To conduct the research, information on 146 companies was collected during 2011-2011. The statistical model used is a multivariate regression model and combined data were used to test the hypotheses. The results show that there is no significant relationship between the comparability of financial statements and accrual based earnings management and actual earnings management.
1- Introduction
Accounting can be defined by the process of identifying measurement measures and reporting financial information in order to enable informed decision-making and making informed decisions by financial users. The presentation of these reports to foreign users of financial information is provided in a specific framework, which should verify the accuracy of these information and reports with the help of standards. One of the items of financial statements that is considered as a measure of performance appraisal and profitability of the profit unit is "profit reporting". In the event that the actual profit is inconsistent with the reported profit in the financial statements, an event called earnings management occurred. Since the main objective of accounting is to provide useful information for users of financial statements for financial decisions. The information provided in the financial statements will be useful if it has qualitative features of financial information. One of these qualitative features is the comparability of financial statements. Comparative capability is one of the reporting features that increases the quantity and quality of information available to investors and allows them to predict future performance more accurately by evaluating the past performance of the company and based on it decide (Di Franco, Kotari and Verdi, 2011). Hence, the more specific the ability to compare accounting information is, the more investors will be able to accurately predict future real profits and thus increase their ability to assess financial statements by focusing on profit management.
 
2- Research Questions or hypothesis
The reported profit of companies is considered as one of the important criteria for decision-making and is one of the most important criteria for evaluating performance and determining the value of an enterprise, which is always used by a wide range of users. The calculation of profits of an enterprise is influenced by accounting methods so if managers, through exercising their authority in the field of accounting choices in financial reporting, have incentives to mislead users of financial statements, the probability of manipulation or management of profits One way is to manipulate accruals and manipulate the actual activities of the economic unit. Therefore, the financial statements should be as high as possible on the qualitative characteristics of the financial statements in accordance with the theoretical basis of accounting and financial reporting (Publication 113, Audit Organization). Based on theoretical principles of accounting in Iran, prepared by the Accounting Standards Committee, qualitative attributes refer to the characteristics that make the information provided in the financial statements for users in order to assess the financial position, financial performance and financial flexibility of the entity useful. One of the qualitative features of financial statements (comparative capability) is financial statements. We expect the reliability of the comparative financial statements to be improved, thus, the quality of the financial statements and the financial statements information are more reliable.
 
3- Hypothese
In this regard, two research hypotheses have been developed for conducting the research:
H1. The ability to compare accounting and accrual-based profit management is meaningful.
H2. There is a meaningful relationship between the ability to compare accounting and real profit management.
 
3- Methods
In this study, the relationship between accounting and profitability comparability of companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange has been investigated. The dependent variable of this research is accrual based profit management (Kotari model, Lyon and Weizley, 2005) and real profit management ( On Chaudhry, 2006) and the independent variable, the ability to compare accounting (De Franco, Kotari, and Verdi, 2011). Since the results of this research can be used in the decisions of managers, investors and capital market participants, the objective aspect is considered as an applied research. In addition, the method of inference regarding the research hypotheses is in the descriptive-correlation research group. The research community of all companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange was considered. Investment industries, financial intermediation and banks and credit institutions were omitted from the statistical society due to the specific nature of their activities as well as the lack of information on the variables of some companies. Finally, the data of 146 companies available for a five-year period (2011-2014) were extracted and collected from the audited financial statements of Tehran Stock Exchange companies and the new Rahnavard Software for testing hypotheses. Data analysis and hypothesis testing were performed using R and Excel software and F and Husman tests were used to test the type of data.
 
4- Results
The results of the hypothesis test in 146 selected companies in Tehran's Erofs Exchange showed that there is no significant relationship between the ability to compare the accounting by De Franco and the actual profit management based on accrual items.
 
5- Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, the relationship between accounting and earnings management based on accruals items was investigated. Two hypotheses were developed for the purpose of research and 146 companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange were analyzed. To measure the comparability of accounting with Di Franco et al. (2011) and for accruals-based earnings management, the Kotari, Lyon and Weisley models (2005) and the real profit management model of the Controller model (2006) have been used. The results of the first and second hypotheses showed that there is no significant relationship between the feature of comparability and the management of earnings and accrual based on the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. Sohn, (2016), in a research entitled "The Effect of Comparative Accounting on Accrual Based and Acceptable Actuarial Management", examined whether and how managers' optimistic earnings management activities were able to measure the degree of comparability of their company accounting with other firms Companies are affected, paid. The results of the research showed that with the degree of comparability of company accounting with other companies, the management of earnings based on accruals decreases and real profit management increases. The result of this study showed that there was no significant relationship between the feature of comparative accounting ability using the DI Franco model and earnings management based on accrual and real items at the level of the companies accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange. According to the results of Sohnan's research (2016) , Conflicts. If the time domain of the research was considered for a longer period, the results could have been more generalized. However, considering that the ability to compare the need for 6-month financial statements was necessary, and the 6-month financial statements data in the software of the new financial system and the Tehran Stock Exchange website since 2009, there was a period of research since the year 2009 to 1394. In the present study, the model of De Franco et al. (2011) has been used. If another model is used to measure the ability to compare accounting. The results of the research may differ from the current research.
If another model is used to measure the ability to compare accounting

Keywords


 
Babajani, J., Tahriri, A., Saqafi, A., & Badri, A. (2015). Information asymmetry and earnings management: evidence from companies listed on Tehran stock exchange (TSE). Journal of Accounting Advance. 6(2), 1-26. (In Persian)
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M. H. & Williams, C. D. (2013). Effects on comparability and capital market benefits of voluntary adoption of IFRS by US firms: Insights from voluntary adoption of IFRS by non-US firms. Working Paper, Available at: http://www.ssrn.com.
Barth, M., Landsman, W., & Lang, M. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498.
Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2003). The effects of debt contracting on voluntary accounting method changes. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 119-142.
Brochet, F., D. Jagolinzer, A., & Riedl, E. (2012). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management.Available at SSRNhttp//ssrn.com/abstract
Bruns, W., & Merchant, K. (1990). The dangerous morality of managing earnings. Management Accounting, 72(4), 22-25.
Chen, C.-W., Collins, D. W., Kravet, D.T. & Mergenthaler, R. (2013). Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Working Paper, University of Iowa and University of Texas at Dallas. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract.
Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Myers, L. & Ziebart, D. (2014). Financial statement comparability and the ability of current stock returns to reflect the information in future earnings, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract.
Cohen, D.A., Dey, A., & Lys, T.Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-sarbanes oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-788.
Dastgir, M., & Hosseini, E. (2013), Comprehensive overview of earnings management (Part I). Accounting and Auditing Studies. 7(2), 2-19. (In Persian)
De Franco, G., Kothari, S., & Verdi, R. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. J. Account. Res, 49 (4), 895–931.
Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
Dichev, I., (Skinner, D. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis.Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1091-1123.
Engelberg, J., Ozoguz, A., Wang, S., (2016). Know thy neighborindustry cluster, information spillover and market efficiency. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(3), 326-359.
Ewert, R. & Wangenhofer, A. (2005). Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1101-1124.
Farhadi, Z., & Soleimany amiri, G. (2018). The value relevance of accounting information during the essential volatility in Tehran stock exchange. Empirical Research in Accounting, 7(3), 173-198. (In Persian)
Foroghi, D., & Ghasemzad, P. (2016). The effect of financial statement comparability on future earnings response coefficients. Accounting and Auditing Review. 22(4), 479-500. (In Persian)
Foroghi, D., & Ghasemzad, P. (2016). The effect of financial statements comparability on stock price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Accounting Research. 8(1), 39-54. (In Persian)
Gong, G., Li, L., & Zhou, L. (2013).Earnings non-synchronicity and voluntary disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30 (4), 1560–1589.
Graham, J. C. Harvey, & Rajgopal, S. (2005).The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(3), 3-73.
Gross, C., (Perotti, P. (2017). Output-based measurement of accounting comparability: A survey of empirical proxies. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39(22), 1-22.
Habib, A., Monzur Hasan, M., Al-Hadi, A. (2017). Financial statement comparability and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 3(13), 304-321.
Harris, M., & Muller, K. (1999). The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 26(1-3), 285–312.
Jamei, R., Moradifard, G. (2016). Investigating the effects of predicted profits on stock price of listed companies in Tehran Stock. Journal of Accounting Advances.  8(1), 71-102. (In Persian)
Khajavi, Sh., Bayazidi, A., & Jabbarzadeh, S. (2012). A comparison investigation of financial reporting quality in financially distressed and non-distressed firm’s case study: listed companies in TSE. Empirical Research in Accounting, 1(3), 51-66. (In Persian)
Kim, Y., & Li, S. (2010). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Intra-Industry Information Transfer. Working Paper. Santa Clara University.
Kothari, S., Leone, A., Wasley, C. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.
Lang, M., Maffett, M., Owens, E. (2010). Earnings Comovement and Accounting Comparability: The Effects of Mandatory IFRS Adoption. Working Paper, University of Rochester.
Mehrvarz, F., & Marfou, M. (2016). The relationship between financial statements comparability with stock price in formativeness about future earnings. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 13(49), 83-110. (In Persian)
Mergenthaler, R.D., Chen, C.W., Collins, D.W., & Kravet, T. (2014). Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Financial Accounting and Reporting Section Midyear Meeting, Houston, Texas, January 10.
Nabatdost Baghmishe, M. H., & Mohhamadzade Salte., H. (2016). The effect of audit quality on the comparability of financial statements in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Audit Science. 16(62), 159-176. (In Persian)
Namazi, M., Bayazidi, A., & Jabarzade Kangarloyi, S. (2011). Investigating the relationship between audit quality and earnings management of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Research. 3(9), 1-9. (In Persian)
Poorabdolah Sofhasan, Z., Badavarnahandi, Y., & Baradaran Hasanzade, R. (2013). The effect of comparability of financial statements on information asymmetry and cost of equity, The First National Conference of Accounting and Management. Shiraz (In Persian)
Rahmani, A., & Ghashghaei, F. (2018). The relation between accounting comparability and earning management. Accounting and Auditing Review. 24(4), 527-550. (In Persian)
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Vakili Fard, H., Lak, F., & Mohseni, A. (2015). Auditor style and comparability of financial statements. Management Accounting. 8(25), 29-47. (In Persian)
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary on earning management accounting. Accounting Horizons, 3(4), 91-102.
Sohn, B. C. (2016). The effect of accounting comparability on the accrual –based and real earnings management. Journal of Account Public Policy, 35(5), 513 -539.
Yu, F. (2008). Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 245–271.
Zang, A. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87 (2), 675–703.