A Study of the Structure and Framework of Scientific Articles in International Accounting Journals

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Proffesor in Accounting, Shiraz University

2 Ph. D. Student in Accounting, Shiraz University

Abstract

  Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to examine the framework of scientific articles in international accounting journals to access the commonly used method of accounting research. In this regard, a conceptual framework for components of the structure of scientific articles was presented, using the library method.
 
Research Hypotheses
Considering the theoretical foundations of the desirable structure of a research paper and the literature of research, the main question is whether the articles published in accounting journals follow the desirable structure of a scientific research paper? Thus two hypotheses are presented:
Hypothesis 1: The structure of scientific accounting research papers is consistent with the desirable structure of a scientific research paper.
Hypothesis 2: There is a significant difference between the structures of scientific articles in international accounting journals with different degrees.
 
Methods
The conceptual framework for components of the structure of scientific articles was presented, using the library method. In the next step, the structure of 643 articles between 2009 and 2017 and among 78 international accounting journals with varying degrees, were performed, using content analysis and the structure of accounting articles were adapted with conceptual framework according to statistical tests.
 
Results
The results showed that, generally, the structure of accounting articles is in accordance with the structure prescribed in the research method for a scientific article, and only two parts of the theoretical framework and suggestions are not consistent with desirable characteristics of a scientific article. In addition, the results showed that 37 and 36 percent of the articles don't have the section of “suggestions and constraints”. In contrast, 75, 94 and 93 percent of the articles have the desired characteristics of title, resources and introduction. Finally, the ranking of the journals was determined using quartile and the results were compared.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
After determining journal's rank, using quartile, the results were compared. The results of this section showed that the main structure of articles in different journals is not different, but there is a difference between the characteristics of the abstract, keywords, introduction, theoretical framework and findings.
 

Keywords

References

ب. انگلیسی
Abdul Khaliq, R., & Ajinkia, B. (2010), Experimental research in accounting: methodological perspective, Volume 2, Translated by Mohammad Namazi, Shiraz: Shiraz University Press.
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2012). Investigating move structure of English applied linguistics research article discussions published in International and Thai Journal. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-13.
Andrade, C. (2011). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(2), 172.
Baruch, Y. (2001). Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 109-126.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144.
Bernardi, R. A., & Collins, K. Z. (2018). Ranking accounting scholars publishing AIS and technology research in accounting education. AIS Educator Journal, 13(1), 1-28.
Bouillon, M., & Ravenscroft, S. (2010). Undergraduate preparation and dissertation methodologies of accounting Phds over the past 40 years. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 7(2), 19-29.
Bruce, I. (2008). Cognitive genre structures in methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 38-54.
Bruce, N. J. (1983). Rhetorical constraints on information structure in medical research report writing. In ESP in the Arab World Conference, University of Aston, UK.
Buxton, A. B., & Meadows, A. J. (1977). The variation in the information content of titles of research papers with time and discipline. Journal of Documentation, 33(1), 46-52.
Chan, K. C., Seow, G. S., & Tam, K. (2009). Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 875-885.
Christenson, C. (1983). The methodology of positive accounting. Accounting Review, 58(1), 1-22.
Coyne, J. G., Summers, S. L., Williams, B., & Wood, D. A. (2010). Accounting program research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 631-654.
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428-446.
Cunningham, S. J. (2004). How to write a paper? Journal of Orthodontics, 31(1), 47-51.
Dalton, D. W., Harp, N. L., Oler, D. K., & Widener, S. K. (2014). Managing the review process in accounting research: Advice from authors and editors. Issues in Accounting Education, 31(2), 235-252.
Demski, J. S. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 153-157.
Derek, K. O, & William, R. P. (2016). How to review a paper? Issues in Accounting Education, 31(2), 219-234.
Evans, J. H., Feng, M., Hoffman, V. B., Moser, D. V., & Stede, W. A. (2015). Points to consider when self‐assessing your empirical accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1162-1192.
Fellingham, J. C. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 159-163.
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 255-307.
Gastel, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gran, B. (2008). Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gustavii, B. (2017). How to write and illustrate a scientific paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293-317.
Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J., & Fox, C. (2003). Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, 57(3), 389-398.
Hedges, J. R. (2007). The knowledge translation paradigm: Historical, philosophical, and practice perspectives. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(11), 924-927.
Kachelmeier, S. J. (2004). Reviewing the review process. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 26(s-1), 143-154.
Kathleen, F. (2016). The future of academic style: Why citations matter in the age of Google. Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-future-of-academic-style-why-citations-still-matter-in-the-age-of-google/
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.
Kinney Jr, W. R. (1986). Empirical accounting research design for Ph. D. students. Accounting Review, 61(2), 338-350.
Lewison, G., & Hartley, J. (2005). What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63(2), 341-356.
Liddy, E. D. (1991). The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: An exploratory study. Information Processing & Management, 27(1), 55-81.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey.  Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230.
Mansoori, F., Saghafi, A., & Mousapoor, N. (2015). Modeling of accounting doctoral thesis with emphasis on solution for financial problems. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 7(1), 173-207. (in Persian).
Martın, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43.
Moattarian, A., & Alibabaee, A. (2015). Syntactic structures in research article titles from three different disciplines: Applied linguistics, civil engineering, and dentistry. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 34(1), 27-50.
Moilanen, S. (2007). Knowledge translation in management accounting and control: A case study of a multinational firm in transitional economies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 757-789.
Moizer, P. (2009). Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 285-304.
Molina, M. P. (1995). Documentary abstracting: Toward a methodological model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(3), 225.
Moosavi Nezhad, S., & Namzi, M. (2016). The investigation of the action research applications in accounting. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 5(19), 4-23. (in Persian).
Namazi, M., Rajabdoory, H., Roostameymandi, A. (2017). Investigation of the frequency and content analysis of the articles relating to accounting professional ethics in Iran. Journal of Accounting Advences, 9(1), 192-226. (in Persian).
Olalere, T. (2011). Methodology in accounting research: A critique of taxonomy. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1921192
Oler, D. K., Oler, M. J., & Skousen, C. J. (2010). Characterizing accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 24(4), 635-670.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497.
Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 99-122.
Reiter, S. A., & Williams, P. F. (2002). The structure and progressivity of accounting research: The crisis in the academy revisited. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 575-607.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Searcy, D. L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2003). A framework for conducting and evaluating research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 130-167.
Smith, M. (2009). Research Methods in Accounting. London: Sage Publication.
Smith, M. (2017). Research Methods in Accounting. London: Sage Publication.
Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 90-102.
Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381-405.
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Language Studies Unit, University of Aston in Birmingham.
Wood, D. A. (2016). Comparing the publication process in accounting, economics, finance, management, marketing, psychology, and the natural sciences. Accounting Horizons, 30(3), 341-361.
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 March 2018
  • Revise Date: 04 September 2018
  • Accept Date: 21 November 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics