Traditional Teaching Methods vs. Teaching through a Game Board In principles of accounting (1) course

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

 Introduction
       In the 80s and 90s, accounting education received much criticism from accounting bodies. Therefore, since 1990, the accounting profession has given ever-increasing focus and attention to the effectiveness and nature of accounting education and moving to new & innovative teaching approaches (Smalt & Seldon, 2005). Accounting Education Change Commission (1992) emphasized the importance of introductory accounting courses as a basis for success in subsequent courses. This commission highlighted that Students' involvement should be promoted by methods such as games, simulations, and group projects and students should be active learner.
       In introductory accounting courses, students face abstract concepts such as debit and credit, double entry, accounting equation and cycle which are not attractive enough. The general students’ consensus holds that the first course is required and just has to be endured. The use of Monopoly, early in the course, as a catalyst, facilitates a better learning attitude toward the material and thus increases the chance of student success (Shanklin & Ehlen, 2007). In this study, a board game was re-designed for Principles of Accounting (1) course, inspired by Reiss Nitkin (2011). This game consists of a board, dice, and a few cards. The effect of the game on the students’ performance was examined.
 
Hypothesis
       In preliminary courses, students face some problems in understanding accounting concepts. It is expected that active engagement with games can improve their learning. According to the aim of this study, research hypothesis was developed as follows:
       “Using board games for teaching principles of accounting (1), has a positive and meaningful effect on students’ performance”
 
Methodology
        The population of the study consisted of undergraduate students who enrolled in the Accounting Principles (1) in the first semester at 1394-1395 academic year. The current study is Quasi- Experimental in nature. The sample of the study comprised 40 students who were randomly divided into two groups, as experimental and control group. The design of the study is Pre-test- Post-test using ANCOVA. Face validity of the tests were checked by five accounting lecturers. The reliability was checked by using Kuder Richardson for pre and post-test. The result of Kuder-Richrdson was equal to 89% and 90% respectively. Two last sessions were devoted to reviewing the book and solving the problems. The traditional mode was used as education delivery method for control group. In experimental group, game-based learning was used as teaching method. Students filled a 5- point Likert scale survey on the effectiveness of the game. Three game-based learning experts checked validity of the survey. The reliability was measured by using Cronbach alpha equal to 92.7%.
 
Results
        The results of the ANCOVA test showed that there was a significant difference between Mean scores of accounting post-test between two groups. Results confirmed that students in experimental group had better results than students in control group.
Conclusion
        Accounting Education Change Commission (1992) and Pathways Commission (2012) asserted the importance of first course in accounting by using active teaching methods to engage accounting students in order to make introductory accounting courses more attractive. Despite this emphasis and strong theories and background that support game-based learning, this method, has not been implemented in accounting education in Iranian universities. University lecturers often use traditional teaching methods such as lecture and problem solving in their classes. However, new generation of students are impatient and active learners, willing to work with the physical and hands-on tools. In this regard, an instructional board game for Accounting Principles (1) was produced, inspiring Reiss Nitkin (2011). This game was evaluated in Quasi-experimental design method using two groups, experimental and control groups.
       Results of ANCOVA showed the serious board game, had positive and significant effect on undergraduate students’ academic performance in Accounting Principle (1) course. Most of the students believed that attendance in the game sessions was effective for them and enhanced their understanding of basic concepts, analyzing transactions, adjusting entries and accounting cycle. They recommended using game as a teaching method for their future courses. Findings showed that the game might engage learners in teaching and learning process and increase their motivation and enjoyment of learning. Co- working with classmates and debriefing by the instructor after the game provided good feedback for the students.
 
Keywords: Board Game, Monopoly, Principles of Accounting (1), ActiveLearning


 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). (1990). Issues statement number 1: AECC urges priority for teaching in higher education. Issues in Accounting Education, 5(2), 330-331.
Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). (1990). Objectives of education for accountants: Position statement number one. Issues in Accounting Education, 5(2), 307–12.
Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). (1992). The first course in accounting: Position statement No. 2. Issues in Accounting Education, 7(2), 249-251.
Advensia Chrismastuti, A. & Purnamasari, S. V. (2015). The effectiveness of IT usage in accounting. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences, 3)4(, 2320-4044.
Albrecht, W. D. (1995). A financial accounting and investment simulation game. Issues in Accounting Education, 10(1), 127-141.
Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Arnold, L. W. & Fekula. M. J. (2010). IMA Candy Company: An experimental exercise in managerial accounting. Developments in Business Simulations and Experiential Learning, 37(2), 306-309.
Azimi, E., Jafari Harandi, R., & Mousavi Pour, S. (2014). The effectiveness of instructional games on academic achievement and attitude towards science learning. Research in Curriculum Planning, 11(42), 34-44. (In Persian)
Badford, N. M., & Shen Rir, W.E. (1987). Reoriening Accounting Education. Journal of Accounting. (August), 84-91.
Bee, S. & Hayes, D. C. (2005). Using the Jeopardy game to enhance student learning of accounting information systems (AIS) exam material. The Review of Business Information Systems, 9(1), 69-78.
  Bergner, J., &   Brooks, M. (2017). The efficacy of using monopoly to improve undergraduate students’ understanding of the accounting cycle. In T. J. Rupertb & B. B. Kern (Eds.), Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Bigdeli, I., Mohammadifar, M., Rezaei, A., & AbdolHoseinzadeh, A. (1970). The effect of mathematic problem – solving training with playing – based method on attention, problem – solving and self – efficacy in student with mathematic learning disability. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 4(14), 41-52. (In Persian)
Busta, B., & Kimmel, P. (1993). Instructional game: Exploring the impact of information on the stock market. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(2), 378-390.
Capelo, C., Lopes, A., & Mata, A. (2015). A simulation-based approach for teaching the systems perspective of strategic performance management, Accounting Education: An International Journal, 24)1(, 1-26.
Cook, E. D. (1997). An innovative method of classroom presentation: What is Jeopardy? Journal of Accounting Education, 15(1), 123-131.
Elson, R. J., Ostapski, S. A., O’Callaghan, S., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Enhancing the understanding of government and nonprofit accounting with the puzzle game: A Pilot Study. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9(3), 1-9
Esmailikia, G., & Mollanazari, M. (2017). Identifying barriers and constraints to implement reforms in the financial and operational accountability systems of public universities. Journal of Accounting Advances, 8(2), 1-29. (In Persian)
Fowler, L. (2006). Active learning: An empirical study of the use of simulation games in the financial introductory accounting class. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal; 10(3), 93-103.
Fratto, V. (2011). Enhance student learning with PowerPoint games: Using 20 questions to promote active learning in managerial accounting. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 7(2), 13-20.
Gamlath, S. L. (2007). Outcomes and observations of an extended accounting board game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 34(3), 132-137.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The  theory of multiple intelligences basic books.
Gupta, S., Elson, R., & Ostapski, S. A. (2006). The puzzle game: A novel approach to teaching accounting. The accounting instructors’ report, 3(1), 1-5.
Haywood, M. E, McMullin, D. A., & Wygal, D. E. (2004). Using games to enhance student understanding of ethical responsibilities. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(1), 85-99.
Hoffjan, A. (2005). Calvados: A business game for your cost accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(1), 63-80.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies and education. NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Khazaei, K., & Jalilian, N. (2015). The effect of educational computer games on primary school student’s achievement and creativity. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 5(2), (18), 23-39. (In Persian)
Knechel, R. W. (1989). Using a business simulation game as a substitute for a practice set. Issues in Accounting Education, 4(2), 411-424.
Lippincott, B., & Pergola, T. (2009). Use of a job cost simulation to engage gen Y students. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 15(2), 97-113.
Moncada, S. M., & Moncada, T. P. (2014). Gamification of learning in accounting education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14(3), 9-19.
Murphy, E. A. (2005). Enhancing student learning with governmental accounting Jeopardy. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(2), 223-248.
Pando-Garcia, J., Periañez-Cañadillas, I., & Charterina, J. (2015). Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1731-1736.
Pathwags commission (2012). The pathways: Charting anational strategy for the never generation of accountants. Americal Accounting Associatory and American Institute of CPAS.
 Permatsari, A. G. (2015). Development of yogy accounting monopoly educative game as learning media-based computer for introduction to FINANCE and accounting. undergraduate Thesis. Faculty of Economics, Yogyakarta State University.
Phillips, M. E., & Graeff, T. R. (2014). Using an in-class simulation in the first accounting class: Moving from surface to deep learning. Journal of Education for Business, 89(5), 241-247.
Pillsbury, C. M. (1993). Systems Softball: An interactive, group game for teaching internal control evaluation. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(1), 128-138.
Reiss Nitkin, M. (2011). Game of business: Game for use in introductory accounting. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 21(1), 131-152.
Shakur, M., Haqqani, F., Shokri, T., & Bahramian, H. (2013). The effect of game teaching method on student satisfaction and academic achievement in anatomy. Journal of Isfahan Medicine of School, 31 (244), 1038-1047. (In Persian)
Shanklin, S. B. & Ehlen, C. R. (2007). Using the Monopoly® board game as an efficient tool in introductory financial accounting instruction. Journal of Business Case Studies, 3)3(, 17-22.
Smalt, S. W. & Selden, G. L. (2005). The impact of an accounting simulation on performance and perception in accounting courses. Journal of Executive Education, 4(1), 21-41.
Spiceland, C. P., Spiceland, J. D. & Schaeffer, S. J. (2015). Using a course redesign to address retention and performance issues in introductory accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 33(1), 50-68.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed). Boston: Pearson Education.
Tabachnick, G. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental Designs using ANOVA. Belmont, CA: Duxbury
Tanner, M. M., & Lindquist, T. M. (1998). Using MONOPOLYTM and team-games-tournaments in accounting education: A cooperative learning teaching resource. Accounting Education, 7(2), 139-162.
Tsai, M. Y. (2016). Research on multiple intelligences of junior high school students with different background variables. Journal of Modern Education Review, 6(1), 10-18.
Zelin, R. C. (2010). An exploration of the effectiveness of an audit simulation tool in a classroom setting. American Journal of Business Education, 3(9(, 7-12.
 
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 February 2017
  • Revise Date: 09 May 2017
  • Accept Date: 18 June 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics