بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت حسابرسی از دیدگاه حسابرسان مستقل و مدیران مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری حسابداری ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحداصفهان(خوراسگان)

2 دانشیار گروه حسابداری ،دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد،دانشگاه اصفهان،اصفهان،ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش از طریق بررسی یک چارچوب تحلیلی مبتنی بر نتایج تحقیقات انجام‌شده طی سال‌های اخیر در خصوص کیفیت حسابرسی، تلاش دارد به مدلی مفهومی در خصوص کیفیت حسابرسی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن دست یابد. این عوامل شامل: عملیات حسابرسی، گروه حسابرسی و مقررات حسابرسی بوده و ازآنجاکه کیفیت حسابرسی و عوامل مؤثر یادشده متغیرهای پنهان می‌باشند، جهت اندازه‌گیری آن‌ها از مدل‌سازی مبتنی بر معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی بهره گرفته‌شده است. معادله عمومی ساختاری این پژوهش دارای چهار مدل اندازه‌گیری شامل سه مدل اندازه‌گیری انعکاسی X و یک مدل اندازه‌گیری انعکاسی Y بوده و یک مدل ساختاری نیز، رابطه بین متغیرهای مستقل برون‌زای پنهان را با متغیر وابسته پنهان درون‌زای کیفیت حسابرسی تبیین می‌نماید. جامعه آماری اول این پژوهش شامل حسابداران رسمی شاغل در سازمان حسابرسی و مؤسسات حسابرسی بوده و جامعه آماری دوم شامل کلیه شرکت‌های سرمایه‌گذاری است که تحت نظارت سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار تهران فعالیت می‌کنند. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش، کلیه فرضیه‌های پژوهش که در قالب مدل‌سازی مبتنی بر معادلات ساختاری طراحی و داده‌پردازی شده است، تائید گردیده و بیانگر تأثیر سه عامل مذکور بر کیفیت حسابرسی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Factors Affecting the Audit Quality from the Viewpoints of Independent Auditors and Financial Managers of Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatah Behzadian 1
  • Naser Izadi Nia 2
1 ebtekar hesab aria audit firm/ audit manager
2 isfahan university
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The desire to gain long-term benefits in the field of professional credit and earnings has led to considering audit quality as a factor of increasing professional competitiveness in audit services' market from the viewpoint of auditors, and from this perspective, this has been considered in conducted studies. Palmrose (1988) defined the quality of the audit as follows: ensuring the financial statements is audit quality and the financial statements are free from any significant misstatement". This definition emphasizes the result of the audit, because the ability to rely on financial statements before the audit cannot be specified; therefore, the actual quality of the audit cannot be observed and cannot be evaluated until the audit has reached its result (Hasas Yeganeh and Azinfar, 2010). Titman and Trueman (1986) also believe that since actual audit quality cannot be observed before auditing or during auditing, there is a need for variables to evaluate the actual quality of the audit. Although many factors affect the quality of audit services, few studies have been conducted to create a conceptual framework or model for describing the structure of quality of audit services. In recent decades, some of the studies conducted in the field of audit quality have attempted to provide an analytical framework based on audit regulations in European countries, as well as the results of previous studies, including Carcello et al. (1992), Knechel et al. (2013). Of course, the study results of Francis (2011) and Gonthier Besacier et al. (2016), which provide the analytical framework for a more complete audit quality according to the results of previous studies and European audit regulations (especially French), and are more similar to Sarbanes Oxley regulatory texts, have been great efforts in this field. This study by formulating factors affecting the quality of audit according to the results of studies conducted and solutions presented in Iranian auditing standards regarding the quality improvement of audit services and presenting them in the form of a conceptual model attempts to consider single and distributed factors affecting the quality of audit based on previous studies in the form of the main and operational factors.
 
Hypotheses
The hypotheses of this research are as follows:
H1: Audit operations affect audit quality.
H2: Audit group activity affects audit quality.
H3: Auditing rules affect audit quality.
 
Methods
The information needed to test the research hypotheses have been obtained through a researcher-made questionnaire. The first statistical population of this study consists of CPA’s working in an independent audit profession as managers, senior managers, supervisors and senior supervisors (in the audit firm), partners, technical managers, audit supervisors and senior supervisors (in private audit firms), and the second statistical population of this study consists of financial managers of all investment companies that operate under the supervision of Securities and Exchange Organization. The sampling method in this study is a categorized probability sampling method for the first statistical population of this study. The subjects are selected from all classes conveniently. For this reason, we used Cochran formula to estimate the sample size in each class of the statistical population. Among the numbers obtained as the sample size of each class, the largest value was chosen as the final sample size. The final sample size obtained from this study was n = 205 for the first statistical population and n = 74 for the second statistical population of all investment companies operating under the supervision of Securities and Exchange Organization and questionnaires were distributed to respondents through in person referring and / or sent by email. After distributing the questionnaires, in total, 174 questionnaires were collected. 6 questionnaires were unusable due to failure to answer all questions, and a total of 168 questionnaires were used in statistical analysis. Regarding the theoretical concepts presented on the quality of the audit, this concept cannot be observed; therefore, the dependent variable is hidden and endogenous, and the independent variables are also hidden, but are exogenous. Consequently, the evaluation of the conceptual model of the research to study the research hypotheses based on the structural equations modeling with partial least squares approach was conducted to study the causal relationships between the invisible and hidden variables with interwoven relationships.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The factors affecting the audit quality in three fields of audit operations, audit regulations and audit group are presented in the form of a conceptual model based on the analytical framework based on previous conducted studies. Regarding theoretical concepts of audit quality, this concept cannot be observed. As a result, the evaluation of the conceptual model of the research to test the research hypotheses based on the structural equations modeling with partial least squares approach was used to study the causal relationships between the visible and hidden variables with interwoven relationships including four reflective measurement models and a structural model. After testing validity and reliability of reflective measurement models, the general test of these models and testing the quality of the structural model for the research hypotheses, it was found that the null hypothesis was rejected in the test of all three hypotheses that is the claim contradiction, indicating that all the hypotheses of the research were confirmed and the above factors affect the quality of audit services. The results also indicate the general utility of the general structural model designed to predict the factors affecting the quality of the audit services. According to the conceptual model, 20 qualitative features were presented to review them. The study of the effects of all exogenous independent variables (audit operations, audit group and audit regulations) on the endogenous dependent variable of the model (audit quality) showed that the independent variable of audit operations with a direct effect factor of 0.431, independent variable of the audit group with a direct effect factor of 0.299 and independent variable of audit regulations with a direct effect factor of 0.253 in total could explain 79.6 percent of the total variation in audit quality.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • audit quality
  • Expectation Gap
  • Audit Quality Perception
 
منابع
الف. فارسی                                                         
انصاری، عبدالمهدی؛ کمالی کرمانی، نرجس و طالبی نجف‌آبادی، عبدالحسین (1390).  بررسی تأثیر انجام هم‌زمان خدمات حسابرسی و غیر حسابرسی از دیدگاه دانشگاهیان و تحلیل گران بورس اوراق بهادار، تحقیقاتحسابداریوحسابرسی، 9 (36)،‌ 53-73.
ایزدی نیا، ناصر و علی مرادی، افسر (1392). کیفیت حسابرسی، حسابداررسمی، 21، 59-68.
پیری، پرویز و برزگری صدقیانی، سمانه (1395). بررسی رابطة بین دورة تصدی و تغییر حسابرس با کیفیت سود شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بر اساس مدل کاسنیک، پیشرفتهایحسابداری، 8(2)، 65-91.
حساس یگانه، یحیی (1388). فلسفةحسابرسی، چاپ دوم، تهران، شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
حساس یگانه، یحیی و آذین‌فر، کاوه (1389). رابطة بین کیفیت حسابرسی و اندازة مؤسسة حسابرسی، بررسی‌هایحسابداریوحسابرسی، 17(61)، 65-98.
حساس یگانه، یحیی و جعفری، ولی‌الله (1389). بررسی تأثیر چرخش مؤسسات حسابرسی بر کیفیت گزارش حسابرسی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، فصلنامةبورساوراقبهادار، 3(9) 25-42.
ستایش، محمدحسین و صیادی، لیدا (1396). بررسی رابطة بین جریان‌های نقدی آزاد مازاد و مدیریت سود با تأکید بر نقش تعدیل‌کنندگی کیفیت حسابرسی (شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پیشرفت‌هایحسابداری، 9(1)، 67-97.
شمس‌زاده، باقر؛ سیف، علی‌اصغر و داودآبادی فرهانی، حسن (1395). بررسی رابطة بین ویژگی‌های مؤسسة حسابرسی و شرکا حسابرسی با کیفیت حسابرسی، دانشحسابداری،  3(1)، 135-156.
کمیتة تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی (1392)، استانداردهایحسابرسی، چ 8، تهران، سازمان حسابرسی.
مجتهدزاده، ویدا و آقایی، پروین (1383). عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت حسابرسی از دیدگاه حسابرسان مستقل و استفاده‌کنندگان، بررسی‌هایحسابداریوحسابرسی، 11(38)، 53-76.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ مهرانی، کاوه؛ رحمانی، علی و مداحی، آزاده (1392). تدوین مدل کیفیت حسابرسی، فصلنامةبورساوراقبهادار، 6(23)، 103-147.
مهرانی، ساسان و نعیمی، مهدیس (1382). تئوری اخلاقی و تأثیر فشار بودجة زمانی بر رفتار حسابرسان مستقل، بررسی‌هایحسابداریوحسابرسی، 10(32)، 43-61.
نمازی، محمد؛ بایزیدی، انور و جبارزاده کنگرلویی، سعید (1390). بررسی رابطة بین کیفیت حسابرسی و مدیریت سود در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، تحقیقاتحسابداری، 3، 4-21.
واعظ، سید علی؛ احمدی، محمد رمضان و رشیدی باغی، محسن (1393). تأثیر کیفیت حسابرسی بر حق‌الزحمة شرکت‌ها. فصلنامةدانشحسابداریمالی، 1(1)، 87-107.
هشی، عباس و مظاهری فرد، کمیل (1392). بررسی رابطة بین اندازة مؤسسة حسابرسی و کیفیت حسابرسی، تحقیقاتحسابداریوحسابرسی، 17، 34-51.
ب. انگلیسی
Ansari, A., Kamali Kermani, N., & Talebi Najaf Abadi, A. (2013). Study of simultaneous performance of audit and non-audit services on auditor independence from the viewpoint of academics and stock exchange analysts. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 9(36), 53-73. (in persian)
Arel, B., Brody, R. & Pany, K. (2008). Audit firm rotation & audit quality. CPA Journal, 75(1), 36-39.
Auditing Standards Development Committee. (2013). Auditing standards, Vol 8, Tehran, Auditing Organization. (in persian)
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T. (1992). Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing, 11(1), 1-15.
Catanach Jr, A. H., & Walker, P. L. (1999). The international debate over mandatory auditor rotation: A conceptual research framework. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8(1), 43-66.
Davidson, R. A., & Neu, D. (1993). A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 479-488.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
Dunn, K., Mayhew, B., & Morsfield, S. (2000). Auditor industry specialization and client disclosure quality (Working paper). Baruch College and University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Gonthier‐Besacier, N., Hottegindre, G., & Fine‐Falcy, S. (2016). Audit quality perception: Beyond the ‘Role‐Perception Gap’. International Journal of Auditing, 20(2), 186-201.
Hasas Yeganeh, Y. (2009). Auditing philosophy, Edition 2, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. (in persian)
Hasas Yeganeh, Y., & Jafari, V. (2010). Investigating the effect of rotation of audit firms on the quality of auditing reports of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Securities Exchange Quarterly, 3(9) 25-42. (in persian)
Hashi, A., & Mazaherifard, K. (2013). The relationship between firm size and quality of services performed. Accounting and Auditing Research, 5(17), 34-51. (in persian)
Hassas Yeganeh, Y., & Azinfar, K. (2010). Relationship between audit quality and auditor size. Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(61),85-98. (in persian)
Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A., & Barragato, C. A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761-786.
Izadinia, N., & Ali Moradi, A. (2013). Audit quality, Official Accountant, 21, 59-68. (in persian)
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2012). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 385-421.
Lam, S.-S., & Chang, S. L. (1994). Auditor service quality and auditor size: Evidence from initial public offerings in Singapore. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 3(1), 103-114.
Li, D. (2007). Auditor tenure and accounting conservatism: Georgia Institute of Technology. PhD Thesis, Colege of Management.
Li, D. (2010). Does auditor tenure affect accounting conservatism? Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(3), 226-241.
Libby, R., & Frederick, D. M. (1990). Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 348-367.
Louis, H. (2004). Acquirers' Abnormal Returns, Audit Firm Size, and the Small Auditor Clientele Effect. https://ssm.com/abstract=483662.
Mashayekhi, B., Mehrani, K., Rahmani, A., & Madahi, A. (2013). development of audit quality model. Securities Exchange Quarterly, 6(23), 103-147. (in persian)
McEnroe, J. E., & Martens, S. C. (2001). Auditors' and investors' perceptions of the “expectation gap”. Accounting Horizons, 15(4), 345-358.
Mehrani, S., & Naeemi, M. (2003). Ethical theory and the impact of time budget pressure on independent auditors' behavior. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 10 (32), 43-61. (in persian)
Mojtahedzadeh, V. & Aghaei, P. (2004). Factors affecting the quality of independent auditing from the perspective of independent auditors and users. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 11(4), 53-76. (in persian)
Namazi, M., Bayazidi, A., & Jabbarzadeh Kangarloui, S. (2011). Investigating the relationship between auditing quality and profit management in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting Research, 3, 4-21. (in persian)
Palmrose, Z.-V. (1988). 1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review, 55-73.
Pany, K., & Reckers, P. M. (1988). Auditor performance of MAS: A study of its effects on decisions and perceptions. Accounting Horizons, 2(2), 31-38.
Piri, P., & Barzegari Sadaghiani, S. (2017). A Study of the relation between audit firm rotation and audit firm tenure on income quality at Tehran Stock Exchange Companies based on Kasznik model. Jornal of Accounting Advances, 8(2), 65-91. (in persian)
Schroeder, M. S., Solomon, I., & Vickrey, D. (1986). Audit quality: The perceptions of audit-committee chairpersons and audit partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 5(2), 86-94.
Setayesh, M., & Sayadi, L. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between surplus free cash flows and earnings management, with an emphasis on the moderating role of audit quality (Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange). Journal of Accounting Advances, 9(1), 67-97. (in persian)
Shamszadeh, B., Seif, A., & Davodabadi Farahani, H. (2016). Studying relationship between characteristics of audit institutions and audit partners with audit quality. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 3(1), 135-156. (in persian)
Shockley, R. A. (1981). Perceptions of auditors' independence: An empirical analysis. Accounting Review, 785-800.
Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1987). Product differentiation in auditing: Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues: Canadian Certified GeneralAccountants' Research Foundation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Titman, S., & Trueman, B. (1986). Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(2), 159-172.
Vaez, A., Ahmadi, M. R., & Rashidi Baghi, M. (2014). The effect of audit fees on audit quality in Companies Listed in Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 1(1), 87-107. (in persian)
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wooten, T. C. (2003). Research about audit quality. The CPA Journal, 73(1), 48-64.